Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Property owner found pipelines in her trees (& creeks & streams) (Original Post) RiverLover Apr 2015 OP
It seems to me that the oil and gas companies can just declare eminent domain wherever they djean111 Apr 2015 #1
I agree. RiverLover Apr 2015 #2
Isn't it just lovely, how the Republicans and teabaggers marym625 Apr 2015 #41
This is what you would see in a third world country newfie11 Apr 2015 #3
Doesn't it though? RiverLover Apr 2015 #5
In a third world country there would be armed guards protecting this mess. hunter Apr 2015 #39
+a kazillion! marym625 Apr 2015 #42
+++++++ newfie11 Apr 2015 #47
And those guards would report to a thug who gets support from the U.S. in exchange for a good deal. arcane1 Apr 2015 #51
We aren't 3rd world, yet awoke_in_2003 Apr 2015 #45
Very frightening. Oil & Gas have nothing to fear from the government Pooka Fey Apr 2015 #4
Especially no fear from Gov Kasich("k-Sick") in Ohio. RiverLover Apr 2015 #7
There is more to this story Kilgore Apr 2015 #6
So that is how they lay pipeline now? Through creeks & streams? RiverLover Apr 2015 #9
Well, if they have an easement they CAN come back as often as they like 7962 Apr 2015 #11
Don't assume, read your deed. Kilgore Apr 2015 #15
It's not even about the property, its about the unsafe usage of garden hoses carrying toxic crap glowing Apr 2015 #10
Read the article Kilgore Apr 2015 #12
Regardless if its legal currently, it shouldn't be!!!! Common Sense? glowing Apr 2015 #17
Some people can't understand that "legal" and "ethical" are often antonyms Scootaloo Apr 2015 #33
^^^Too true, sadly. /nt RiverLover Apr 2015 #36
You work in the industry? I never would have guessed. Scuba Apr 2015 #46
Yep. If it was done after she bought the property, yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #52
Exactly. She did know there was a functioning oil and gas well ON the property, and bought it. robinlynne Apr 2015 #55
That crazy set up looks like a bunch of garden hoses attached together. glowing Apr 2015 #8
Odd that enough of whatever it is could be transported thru that size hose 7962 Apr 2015 #14
Saw that tried once, it was not pretty Kilgore Apr 2015 #19
hey, I can arrange to be 100 miles away if needed! 7962 Apr 2015 #24
None of us owns the mineral rights to our rural property. kaiden Apr 2015 #13
All it takes is....... Kilgore Apr 2015 #16
This has way less to do with mineral rights and BS property rights... It has way more to do with the glowing Apr 2015 #18
Sorry, but I work in the real world Kilgore Apr 2015 #21
BTW, if you actually bothered to watch the video, the land owner wasn't concerned that glowing Apr 2015 #23
Speaking from experience Kilgore Apr 2015 #26
Buyer beware, I agree, read the deed and research property... AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #48
He's been a member since '12, so he's hardly a "plant" 7962 Apr 2015 #25
Plant?? Kilgore Apr 2015 #30
Hey, there are some paranoid folks around DU! 7962 Apr 2015 #32
Part of the charm of DU Kilgore Apr 2015 #43
No. You did not read the entire article. She bought the land KNOWING there was a functioning oil and robinlynne Apr 2015 #56
We live on the side of a mountain. kaiden Apr 2015 #20
Easy enough to do Kilgore Apr 2015 #22
Just another thought Kilgore Apr 2015 #28
Thanks. kaiden Apr 2015 #37
Again, we focus anger on companies who are complying with the law. JayhawkSD Apr 2015 #27
Amen!! Kilgore Apr 2015 #29
So what happens if someone is just driving a tractor or ATV and snag these? mackdaddy Apr 2015 #35
This is in a designated "National Forest" region, so it's more like the wild west? RiverLover Apr 2015 #38
because as we know, law springs up whole cloth from the minds of legislators Scootaloo Apr 2015 #34
Just because companies suggest it JayhawkSD Apr 2015 #57
Of course it's legal. rickford66 Apr 2015 #31
And their shills tell us how foolish we are for getting pissed. GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #40
So if your really pissed then..... Kilgore Apr 2015 #44
We have worked here in NY to get a temporary ban on fracking. rickford66 Apr 2015 #50
No they hire and pay good money for representatives of state to do it for them.... AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #49
Kick midnight Apr 2015 #53
ummm. She bought land with a working gas and oil well next to her house... Isn't that even scarier? robinlynne Apr 2015 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #58
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. It seems to me that the oil and gas companies can just declare eminent domain wherever they
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 07:37 AM
Apr 2015

want to, and our government is complicit in that. Another reason to figure why vote, the government seems not really there for anything but business.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
41. Isn't it just lovely, how the Republicans and teabaggers
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 12:46 PM
Apr 2015

Can forego their small government mantra when it comes to corporate greed?

Oy!

hunter

(38,339 posts)
39. In a third world country there would be armed guards protecting this mess.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 12:39 PM
Apr 2015

Otherwise people would be stealing whatever is in the pipes, and the pipes themselves.

The U.S.A. is an odd place. We let the oligarchs walk all over us.

Block a highway, or even a sidewalk, in legitimate protest against killer cops or unjust wars or starvation wages, and just watch people scream, even here on DU, about how their right to be a good little citizen wage slaves is being violated, all those terrible protesters inconveniencing them.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
51. And those guards would report to a thug who gets support from the U.S. in exchange for a good deal.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:03 PM
Apr 2015

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
6. There is more to this story
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:39 AM
Apr 2015

Here is a link to the rest of the story,

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/04/25/gas-pipelines-surprise-land-owners.html

What does not make sense to me is the landowner not looking over the deed when they bought the property. Everything from telephone lines through oil pipelines require an easement and they are listed on her title report.

Looks like a case of buyer beware to me.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
9. So that is how they lay pipeline now? Through creeks & streams?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:49 AM
Apr 2015

I'm sorry, I didn't realize one should expect such haphazard transporting of gas.

Is this going on all over the country?

It should be as big of deal, or bigger, than Keystone XL.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
11. Well, if they have an easement they CAN come back as often as they like
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:05 AM
Apr 2015

I had to deal with that once with a pwr company

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
15. Don't assume, read your deed.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:14 AM
Apr 2015

That's why it's important to read your deed and title report. They contain the easment and spell out exactly what the easment holder can or cannot do.

Another issue is mineral rights. Just because you own the land does not mean you own the rights. The wrong time to figure it out is when the drill rig shows up on your property.

Don't assume, read your deed.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
10. It's not even about the property, its about the unsafe usage of garden hoses carrying toxic crap
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:56 AM
Apr 2015

thru the watershed in such a deplorable manner. Do you really think stringing hoses together across trees, through fresh water sources, and haphazardly thru the forest carpet and brush, is safe? And when the pipe busts or starts leaking, and is discovered a year or two later on, what will be the excuse? Since they always declare that they operate with the utmost respect to safety and environmental concerns?

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
12. Read the article
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:07 AM
Apr 2015

I agree it looks goofy, and I work in the industry, but it's a legal installation according to the Department of Natural Resources and it would have been lister on her deed as such. Taking a few minutes to read the document would have spared her this headache.
 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
17. Regardless if its legal currently, it shouldn't be!!!! Common Sense?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:27 AM
Apr 2015

I swear some people who pop up here seem to be a bit lost... When humans cause our planet to go extinct, I guess we won't have to worry about what some rule or non-rule said at some time.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
52. Yep. If it was done after she bought the property,
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:55 PM
Apr 2015

I'd have sympathy for her but it was there before she was. I feel the same way when someone buys a house near an air base and complains about the jet noise. Did you not think jets would be flying?

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
8. That crazy set up looks like a bunch of garden hoses attached together.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:49 AM
Apr 2015

A cold winter with freezing temperatures, sun/ heat exposure, weather storms, and animal/ people coming into contact, would certainly spring a leak. Shoot, a woodpecker could peck a hole thru the hoses in the trees. Are they really this blatant. I would probably try to find a way to shut off the source and remove all the garden hoses. This is absolute crazy beans!!!

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
14. Odd that enough of whatever it is could be transported thru that size hose
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:12 AM
Apr 2015

And I'd probably do the same; crimp the hose, cut it and cap it. And deny ever being there!

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
19. Saw that tried once, it was not pretty
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:31 AM
Apr 2015

The person trying it ended up in federal court and was assessed $25,000 in fines.

In full disclosure, I work for a company with oil and gas clients.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
24. hey, I can arrange to be 100 miles away if needed!
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:06 AM
Apr 2015

All they have to do is make SOME effort to make this look a little more professional and probably a lot safer. Like the post above said, it doesnt take much to damage a hose that size. I realize its NOT the same as a garden hose, but its pretty ridiculous to have them strung thru trees and across the ground.And what is being carried?
Unless this is some temporary setup of some sort, which is possible

kaiden

(1,314 posts)
13. None of us owns the mineral rights to our rural property.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:10 AM
Apr 2015

At least west of the Mississippi. Farmers and ranchers can have oil and gas companies come in at any time and drill. Union Pacific Railroad owns the mineral rights to our property.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
16. All it takes is.......
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:17 AM
Apr 2015

A landowner in the past needing some quick cash and selling the rights. All future owners get stuck with the results.

Read your deed before buying!

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
18. This has way less to do with mineral rights and BS property rights... It has way more to do with the
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:31 AM
Apr 2015

lack of environmental safety concerns... AND with Republicans in charge, they don't give 2 shits if the planet melts away.. Apparently, neither do you.. Then again, low posting count makes me think.. Hmm really, the industry is pretty darn quick to get someone in place to try and change the conversation from common sense and ridiculous placement of hazardous material to a discussion regarding property rights. AND then to claim the property owner is greedy and sell out their property rights, for real. Next to the oil and gas industry, you would call a small time land owner greedy... What a joke.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
21. Sorry, but I work in the real world
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:49 AM
Apr 2015

As I have disclosed in the past, I am an engineer and some of our clients are in the oil and gas business.

As such I have seen the results of landowners not reading their deeds and getting upset when the drill rig shows up on their doorstep. It's not pretty, it's just sad and totally avoidable with a bit of due diligence by reading the deed or title report before buying.

Regarding greedy property owners selling their property rights. It's not greedy, it's their right to sell them whenever they want. However it is it is up to future owners of the land to realize what they are buying.

Regarding my lack of environmental concerns. Again in the real world, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources has state control over this equipment. If you read the article, you will see they responded to the concerns. If people don't like the regulations as written, then petition elected officials to get them changed. I have seen it done.

Regarding my low post count. I began reading DU off and on since 2009 when I came across it. Finally registered and only post (most of the time) when I can contribute something constructive.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
23. BTW, if you actually bothered to watch the video, the land owner wasn't concerned that
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:01 AM
Apr 2015

gas lines were around, it was more about the haphazard placement of these particular lines... AND perhaps the oil and gas industry should do things in such a stupid manner more often... Don't bury anything, drape these pipes all over neighborhoods and in the path of everyday foot traffic. Perhaps we would embrace solar much faster knowing just how "safe" this industry is.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
26. Speaking from experience
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:14 AM
Apr 2015

The company will do what is needed to comply with the rules as written and not much more.

In the article, ODNR said the installation complied with the rules. Now I agree that rules that allow such a haphazard installation are goofy. But those rules can be changed with public pressure. Have seen it done in WA state, it could be done in OH also.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
25. He's been a member since '12, so he's hardly a "plant"
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:09 AM
Apr 2015

But yes, they could do a better job running whatever it is they're doing on that site.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
56. No. You did not read the entire article. She bought the land KNOWING there was a functioning oil and
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:11 AM
Apr 2015

gas well right next to the house. Noone came in and took or did anything to her land. She bought land AFTER and for some reason did not look at it for 10 or 11 years! Do you think digging up that forest and stream would be better for the environment?

kaiden

(1,314 posts)
20. We live on the side of a mountain.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:36 AM
Apr 2015

Union Pacific first owned this property 100 years ago. We are the second owners of this property...it was developed 40 years ago into small ranchettes. So yes, we DID read the lease, that's how we know UP owns the mineral rights. The farmers and ranchers I know don't mind the oil and gas companies drilling on their land because the oil and gas companies pay good money to lease the surface area. The thing I don't know, but will look up, is if a landowner has successfully purchased the mineral rights. I suppose if the mineral rights are in an area that has been proven barren, one might be able to purchase them from an owner.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
22. Easy enough to do
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:51 AM
Apr 2015

But I suggest you hire a person with experience since it will require a bit of paperwork and a county filing

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
28. Just another thought
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:18 AM
Apr 2015

If you indeed have barren land, the current rights owner possibly will only sell if the price covers their cost to do the negotiation and paperwork.

These were the terms I have seen in other similar deals.

Good luck,
Kilgore

kaiden

(1,314 posts)
37. Thanks.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:28 AM
Apr 2015

I am not too worried about Union Pacific deciding to drill here. If there'd been oil and a way to get it out of the Rocky Mountains, I'm sure they would have done it by now. Our water well is 365 feet deep so I don't know how deep an oil will would have to be...not to mention having to level the damned thing. Now then, those poor people on the plains...

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
27. Again, we focus anger on companies who are complying with the law.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:17 AM
Apr 2015

Read the article. The state Natural Resources Department sent an inspector to check things out and, "That inspector found that the lines running along the ground comply with the law."

If you don't like the law, don't bad mouth the companies who are in compliance with it, go after the legislators who passed the law. Why have laws if you are not going to use it as the standard? Why is it always the company which is evil, even when what it is doing is entirely legal? Why are legislators balmeless, even when we are disgusted with actions which they have made legal and are condemning people for performing those legal actions?

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
29. Amen!!
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:20 AM
Apr 2015

This happend in WA state in the 90's. They now have sone of the most stringent oil/gas pipeline laws in the country.

mackdaddy

(1,529 posts)
35. So what happens if someone is just driving a tractor or ATV and snag these?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:21 AM
Apr 2015

Or a tree falls or rocks fall from a hillside? Or as the woman asks this is a rural hunting area, and what happens if a pipe is hit.

Is the operator responsible for damage to un-buried lines like this?
What if the lines leak and cause a fire or explosion? Is the gas company liable?

Hard to believe this is allowed. I work with electrical installations and this would be shut down as non compliant if it were just an extension cord. Of course many areas here is this part of Ohio do not have any kind of zoning or building inspections as they do in the cities and more populated areas.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
34. because as we know, law springs up whole cloth from the minds of legislators
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:15 AM
Apr 2015

The petroleum companies are just dinghies, haplessly tossed about amid the great waves of independent legislative action!

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
57. Just because companies suggest it
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:29 AM
Apr 2015

doesn't mean legislators have to pass it. Nor does a suggestion from a company relieve the legislators from passing bad laws. They are elected by the people, to represent the people.

rickford66

(5,530 posts)
31. Of course it's legal.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:26 AM
Apr 2015

The oil and gas companies write the laws and regulations for their own convenience and profit. If the worst happens, they claim they followed the laws and regulations.

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
44. So if your really pissed then.....
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 01:11 PM
Apr 2015

Get the laws changed. I personally helped this happen in WA which now has some of the most stringent rules in the nation covering this sort of thing. This was solely due to public pressure and involvement.

Your ire needs to be directed at the lawmakers. If they are on the take, throw them out!! Griping here and calling folks shills doesn't accomplish a thing.

rickford66

(5,530 posts)
50. We have worked here in NY to get a temporary ban on fracking.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:42 PM
Apr 2015

But it's very hard to vote out Republicans in a Republican stronghold. All the Democrats running on a permanent ban lost. At least our neighbors are evenly split on the issue so there's still hope in sight.

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
49. No they hire and pay good money for representatives of state to do it for them....
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:32 PM
Apr 2015

And many towns find the local law enforcements have also been hired...

Response to RiverLover (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Property owner found pipe...