Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumNetanyahu said to deny US request to disavow Oren op-ed
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected an American request to publicly distance himself from the criticism aimed at the White House by former ambassador Michael Oren, according to an Israeli newspaper.
Oren, now a member of the Knesset with the Kulanu party, wrote an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal on Monday accusing US President Barack Obama of intentionally abandoning Israel.
The op-ed has drawn unhappy reactions from the US, including an angry phone call from US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro to Netanyahu, asking the prime minister to renounce Orens ideas in a public statement, according to a report in Haaretz Thursday.
Netanyahu refused Shapiros request and said he had no intention of publicly addressing the piece, an anonymous source told the newspaper.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-said-to-deny-us-request-to-disavow-oren-op-ed/
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Such a humble, gracious country that treats its friends with only the utmost of respect.
I guess they're still peeved that we're not willing to start a war with Iran at their behest.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)From the Forward:
Michael Oren vs. The New York Times
---
But with Oren now giving his account, Rosenthal recalled that one line from Abbass piece that seemed to exercise the Israeli diplomat was the Palestinians assertion that Zionist forces expelled Palestinian Arabs to ensure a decisive Jewish majority in the future state of Israel, and Arab armies intervened.
This historical narrative has been frequently challenged, but it is one that is widely held by Palestinians and is their view of history, he wrote in his email.
As for Orens complaint that the piece falsely stated that the Arabs accepted the 1947 partition while Israel rejected it, Rosenthal seemed genuinely perplexed.
That was the complaint, he recalled in a follow-up interview. We checked the thing he complained about and found it was not in the article. There was no factual issue to correct. Whether he was upset because he doesnt think we should be publishing Abbas, I dont know; you have to ask him.
http://forward.com/opinion/310338/new-york-times-michael-oren-book/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Main