Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumMichael Oren's diplomatic psychobabble
972mag.com/michael-oren-diplomatic-psychobabble/108136/
Michael Oren blames President Barack Obama for ruining relations with Israel, after the latter broke two sacrosanct rules that Oren himself came up with: that the United States and Israel should not have public disagreements, and that no steps should be taken to publicly embarrass the other side.
Oren is aware, of course, of the fact that successive Israeli governments (read: Netanyahus governments) have openly opposed U.S. policy (for instance vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear deal), that every so often those governments declare new rounds of settlement building in the West Bank at the least opportune moments (say, for instance, when Vice President Biden visited Israel), and that they initiate rounds of violence against the Palestinians while openly and proudly declaring their oppositional stance. Oren even knows that Israels prime minister gave a speech to Congress without coordinating with the Obama administration, and did so in an attempt to drive a stake through the presidents Iran policy.
Oren has some very complex explanations for these all these annoying facts: the settlement announcements were never made by the prime minister himself, the attacks on Washingtons Iran policy are of the utmost importance to Israel and the speech to Congress? Every Israeli leader would have done the same, and so on and so on. What is it so difficult for Oren to understand? The fact that Obama does not automatically support Israel, primarily that he does not automatically accept its settlement policies? Is it that President Obama dares to meekly protest the Israeli governments unilateral steps.
That chutzpa that the United States has policies which it doesnt submit for Israeli approval astounds Oren to a degree that he feels the need to explain it. Because neither the historical nor the political tools at Orens disposal can explain such madness (how is it possible that Washington doesnt accept our annexationist policies?), he turns to psychology. Obamas mother was married to two Muslim men. Oren reveals to us that Obama saw himself as a bridge between his mother and her husbands. Oren also dares to speculate how that childs abandonment by those men could lead him, many years later, to seek acceptance by their co-religionists.
Michael Oren blames President Barack Obama for ruining relations with Israel, after the latter broke two sacrosanct rules that Oren himself came up with: that the United States and Israel should not have public disagreements, and that no steps should be taken to publicly embarrass the other side.
Oren is aware, of course, of the fact that successive Israeli governments (read: Netanyahus governments) have openly opposed U.S. policy (for instance vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear deal), that every so often those governments declare new rounds of settlement building in the West Bank at the least opportune moments (say, for instance, when Vice President Biden visited Israel), and that they initiate rounds of violence against the Palestinians while openly and proudly declaring their oppositional stance. Oren even knows that Israels prime minister gave a speech to Congress without coordinating with the Obama administration, and did so in an attempt to drive a stake through the presidents Iran policy.
Oren has some very complex explanations for these all these annoying facts: the settlement announcements were never made by the prime minister himself, the attacks on Washingtons Iran policy are of the utmost importance to Israel and the speech to Congress? Every Israeli leader would have done the same, and so on and so on. What is it so difficult for Oren to understand? The fact that Obama does not automatically support Israel, primarily that he does not automatically accept its settlement policies? Is it that President Obama dares to meekly protest the Israeli governments unilateral steps.
That chutzpa that the United States has policies which it doesnt submit for Israeli approval astounds Oren to a degree that he feels the need to explain it. Because neither the historical nor the political tools at Orens disposal can explain such madness (how is it possible that Washington doesnt accept our annexationist policies?), he turns to psychology. Obamas mother was married to two Muslim men. Oren reveals to us that Obama saw himself as a bridge between his mother and her husbands. Oren also dares to speculate how that childs abandonment by those men could lead him, many years later, to seek acceptance by their co-religionists.
Well, now more and more news outlets are going to be covering the bigoted stupidity that is Michael Oren and Israeli policy.
Some may not want you to read it, some may want to deflect from it, some may want this to go down the memory hole, but you cannot delete history, oppression, human rights abuses, land theft and apartheid.
Those who are uncomfortable with this should not attack the messenger, our country, our president or those who seek justice.
Those who wish to hide this truth have questionable motives, IMHO, and should be called out for it.
BDS.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 740 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michael Oren's diplomatic psychobabble (Original Post)
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jun 2015
OP
well it is rather conveniently timed psychobabble, sort of "prove me wrong" stuff
azurnoir
Jun 2015
#2
oberliner
(58,724 posts)1. "Chill out, Michael."
Good advice.
Response to oberliner (Reply #1)
Post removed
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)2. well it is rather conveniently timed psychobabble, sort of "prove me wrong" stuff
and it allows Rightwingers the option of appearing moderate by appearing to oppose it