Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumPalestinians? Who cares!
For some 100 years, the following was considered an undisputed fact: The Arab-Israeli conflict is the father of all Mideastern conflicts. Should it be resolved, the world thought, we shall see cosmic tranquility descending upon the entire region. Mounds of research were written about this conflict, inflating to the point of becoming a bubble threatening to explode.
Yet then came the so-called "Arab Spring" and the grim truth was exposed: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is marginal compared to the regions real conflicts and its actual influence is limited. Indeed, it was an imaginary conflict based on self-interested reasons.
Over the years, Arab rulers who knew that the ethnic, religious, tribal and regional problems in their own countries were terrible and irresolvable (and this is the reason for the awful slaughter in Syria,) always diverted attention to Israel. And so, the Arab masses ignored their actual distress and instead were preoccupied with the usual anti-Israel incitement.
The Jewish State imagined by the Arab world, the Israel no Arab was actually familiar with, had turned involuntarily into a means for washing away Mideastern sins. Many people made a living and gained fame through this beneficial conflict: It became a career for them.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4187666,00.html
The OP does put things in perspective, Israel is a tiny nation in a sea of larger arab nations. Yet, it appears more integrated and legitate in the region that many of its fractured and factionalized neighbors.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)If a Palestinian state is established, for example, will Assad embrace his domestic foes? Will Ahmadinejad reconcile with his enemies? Will Libyas militias make up? Will Yemen regain even a hint of stability? And what does one have to do with the other at all?
Hezbollah used similar logic. The organization gained its fleeting glory during the war it fought against the IDF on Lebanese soil. Yet once that conflict ended, the group lost its legitimacy in the Arab world. Hezbollah would happily revive its conflict with Israel, yet it realizes that the Jewish state is powerful and has the means to destroy the organization this time around.
The first to realize their stock crashed were the Palestinians. Abbas decision to approach the United Nations last September was a desperate move. He knew developments were not playing out in his favor. After all, if the regions real problems are finally being addressed, there is no longer any need for the Palestinian facade.
Who would actually care whether Abbas joins forces with Hamas Khaled Mashaal or not? Is there anyone actually affected by this? When the entire Mideast is burning, the Palestinian issue comes off the agenda. This is the reason why international networks such as CNN or France2 are leaving Israel at this time or closing down their offices. The Israeli conflict is not longer a story, with the focus shifting to Damascus, Cairo and Tripoli.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4187666,00.html
well now that we have all that Palestinian nonsense cleared up lets go on to the real meat and a perspective that IMO goes hand in hand with the OP and oh if people still aren't convinced there's always Iran
Classic Zionism in Migron
Our role as Zionists is still not finished: Our rabbis teach us that The poor of your own city take priority (Talmud, Baba Metzia.) Classic Zionist challenges still confront us, as they did in the days of the pioneers. The Sarahs, Daliahs and Rinahs have not finished their task of holding on to the Nachal settlements in the Sinai. They and their children are needed to continue settling the Promised Land - all of it.
Yes, the hilltop settlers in Judea and Samaria are the modern successors of the same settlement movement that Yosef Trumpeldor worked for in Tel Chai, Shlomo Ben Yosef in Rosh Pina and Rabbi Shtamper in Petach Tikva. Settlement of Judea and Samaria has led to the renewal of the concepts of working the land, planting vineyards and development of the wine industry in this region during the last two decades.
This is the realization of the words of the prophet Jeremiah, simply put: You will yet plant vineyards in the Samarian hills. (Jeremiah 71:4). Rocky hills, which for hundreds and thousands of years had not been cultivated, are again favoring their residents, who are building homes, planting vineyards, and bearing native sons and daughters on them.
Now, a large percentage of the founders of hilltop communities and their residents are the second generation in Judea and Samaria - sons and daughters who were born, raised and educated there. The descriptive phrase salt of the earth is well suited to many of the leading forces of the settlement expansion movement today. They are handsome, educated youth, devoted to the Zionist ideal of settling the Land and establishing Israeli society within it, ready to give their time and their strength for the good of the nation.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4187971,00.html
pelsar
(12,283 posts)the whole original article is how israel is infact not the center of conflict within the region and you, it appears, can't let go.
any conversation that doesn't involve how "evil" israel is, you're either not a part of, or as in this case, you attempt to bring back to show how infact israel is the core of the conflict.....you need a new hobby
its really an excellent example of what the OP is all about....
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... the British partition of the Ottoman Empire after 1918 was as haphazard and messy as monkeys at a salad bar. The Brits - being big fans of the Hashemite Family proceeded to set them up as kings of arbitrary lines on a map and then left them and the other clans to fight out the details (a scenario that continues until this day). Jordanians hate the Saudis, Iranians hate Iraqis, Jordan and Iraq hate Syria for what they did to Lebanon and so on, and so on...
...It's just so much easier for everyone to hate the Jews.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and if that doesn't work wail that everything is always blamed on Israel
the Arab on Arab death porn going on in Egypt and especially Syria must make for a good diversion but it just doesn't work the article gave it away Israel is pinning its hopes on Arabs killing Arabs to divert attention away from the Palestinians, and that really has little to do with what is happening in other Arab countries
DUIC
(167 posts)and so many other examples of arab-on-arab violence are far more prevalant than Israels presence. That is the gist of the article. Yet, you disproprortiately ascribe so much to Israel. Do you have anything to say about Syria's occupation of Lebanon since 1976?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_occupation_of_Lebanon
The Lebanese civil war that began on April 13, 1975 was the backdrop against which the Syrian military presence in Lebanon was established. Syria first armed the pro-Palestinian militias operated between 1969 (after the Cairo agreement were signed this same year allowing the Palestinians to be armed and to attack Israel from the Lebanese territory) until 1970[1] when the war begun. They tried to mediate between the different factions involved. In January 1976, its proposal to restore the limits to the Palestinian guerrilla presence in Lebanon that had been in place prior to the outbreak of the civil war, was welcomed by Maronites and conservative Muslims, but rejected by the Palestinian guerrillas and their Lebanese Druze-led and leftist allies. To deal with the opposition posed by this latter grouping which was normally allied with Syria, in June 1976, Syria dispatched Palestinian units under its control in Lebanon, and soon sent its own troops as well. Syria claims these interventions came in response to appeals from Christian villagers under attack by the leftists.[2]
By October 1976, Syria had caused significant damage to the strength of the leftists and their Palestinian allies, but at a meeting of the Arab League, it was forced to accept a ceasefire. The League ministers decided to expand an existing small Arab peacekeeping force in Lebanon. It grew to be a large deterrent force consisting almost entirely of Syrian troops. The Syrian military intervention was thus legitimized and received subsidies from the Arab League for its activities.[2]
In the late 1980s, General Michel Aoun was appointed President of the Council of Ministers by President Amine Gemayel, a controversial move since Aoun was a Maronite Christian and the post was by unwritten convention reserved for a Sunni Muslim. Muslim ministers refused to serve in Aoun's government, which was not recognized by Syria. Two rival administrations were formed: a military one under Aoun in East Beirut and a civilian one under Selim el-Hoss based in West Beirut; the latter gained the support of the Syrians. Aoun opposed the Syrian presence in Lebanon, citing the 1982 UN Security Council Resolution 520.[3] The Syrian military remained in Lebanon; after a successful campaign against the Lebanese Forces militia who had controlled Beirut port, Aoun, now with massive popular support in his East Beirut enclave, declared a "War of Liberation" against the Syrian forces. Fighting began on 14 March 1989. Casualties among civilians on both sides from indiscriminate artillery bombardments across the front line were numerous. Aoun initially received a greater degree of international support than el-Hoss, but this ended abruptly with the American build-up for war with Iraq over Kuwait. Aoun had received considerable support from the Iraqi government, anxious to weaken the rival Baathist regime in Damascus;[citation needed] in October 1990 Syrian forces took the presidential palace at Baabda. Aoun took refuge in the French embassy and was later exiled from Lebanon to France. Circumstances surrounding his exile are controversial; his apprehension and exile are variously attributed to Syrian forces, Israeli Defense Forces, Shiite militias, and the Lebanese Forces militia of Samir Geagea.
Since then, Syrian forces remained in Lebanon, exercising considerable influence. In 1991, a Treaty of "Brotherhood, Cooperation, and Coordination", signed between Lebanon and Syria, legitimized the Syrian military presence in Lebanon. It stipulated that Lebanon would not be made a threat to Syria's security and that Syria was responsible for protecting Lebanon from external threats. In September that same year a Defense and Security Pact was enacted between the two countries.[4]
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)You did read the first paragraph of the wiki article you linked to, right?
DUIC
(167 posts)I did read the first paragraph. Why does Syria continue to occupy Lebanon?
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)thats a start I suppose.
Syria's occupation of Lebanon is generally accepted as having ended in 2005. Of course, Syria still has plenty of influence there, in the same way that the US has plenty of influence in Latin America (spies, funding, covert operations and so forth). But that is not the same as an occupation.
DUIC
(167 posts)The impetus for the military occupation to come to an end, yet Syria still continues to control Lebanon's government.
shira
(30,109 posts)So Guy Bechor from YNET speaks for Israel now? And you think that's what he wrote about in the article? Maybe you need to take a break from I/P.
And spare us your crocodile tears for Palestinians.
Tell me, do you support the Arab world's "look over there at Israel" policy of the last 60 years? Yes or No? Really simple question, let's see if you can answer it. I'm thinking you do. Am I wrong?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)which are not always facts in the rest of the world but oh well
"Tell me, do you support the Arab world's "look over there at Israel" policy of the last 60 years? Yes or No? Really simple question, let's see if you can answer it. I'm thinking you do. Am I wrong? "
if your claims were true you might have a point however they are quite untrue so now what shira will we be seeing more vids, that prove your stance and will they be hmmm PMW, CAMERA, MEMRI I can hardly wait
shira
(30,109 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 15, 2012, 10:38 AM - Edit history (1)
"Tell me, do you support the Arab world's "look over there at Israel" policy of the last 60 years? Yes or No? Really simple question, let's see if you can answer it. I'm thinking you do. Am I wrong? "Unanswered.
So am I to gather from your response that you don't believe there's any such policy or strategy WRT the Arab world "looking over there at Israel" the last 60 years?
Yes or No?
And if No, it's just Israel engaging in the "look over there" strategy?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)the Arab world did and does have a so called "policy" of look at Israel when it comes to Palestinians however and especially of late the Arab world is quite busy with its own problems and has been for quite awhile
now have your vids all queued up?
Crunchy Frog
(26,722 posts)Because that's the case, does that then mean that nobody should discuss the Palestinian issue or express any concern over Israel's polcies towards them or the gradual stealth annexation of "Judea and Samaria"?
Does it offend you that this issue is discussed on this board, and not the violence in other Middle Eastern countries?
You do understand that this group deals specifically with the Israel/Palestine issue, don't you? You can find discussion about other Middle Eastern problems in the Foreign Affairs group, if you are so inclined.
DUIC
(167 posts)That's the point of the OP - the disproportional emphasis placed on Israel vis-a-vis the rest of the arab world. Do we see many posts on Foreign Affairs for the plight of the Kurds and their quest for their own independent nation? How about the ethnic cleansing genocide in Sudan? Yet, we read post after post on this forum about some imagined slight committed by Israel. It borders on racism and antisemitism.
Crunchy Frog
(26,722 posts)that don't involve anti-semitism. Hmmm... what other reasons could there possibly be?
Hey! One thing that occurs to me is that there doesn't seem to be a contingent of DUers who oppose Kurdish national aspiratation and argue against their legitimacy at every opportunity. There also doesn't seem to be anyone defending ethnic cleansing and genocide in Sudan.
Is it possible that very little disagreement = little debate and argument = less volume of discussion?
Naw, it's gotta be that there's just tons of anti-semites on DU, and they somehow manage to go on posting without being banned. Yup, that makes much more sense.
And while we're on the subject, why aren't you on the Foreign Affairs board posting about those issues? You're not one of those evil racists too, are you?
Crunchy Frog
(26,722 posts)when someone posts something positive about the current Iranian regime. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002298580
The only reason you don't see lots of threads like this is that the number of DUers who would post such things is vanishingly low. And I wouldn't guess that the OP of that thread is going to last very long here at all.
I think the only reason you don't see oceans of threads attacking the Iranian regime is because it simply doesn't have any defenders here (exception being the OP of that thread and his 16 posts). Most of the people on DU don't want to see either us or Israel go to war with Iran. That doesn't mean we like its government.
DUIC
(167 posts)Celebrating a repressive regime like Iran, with only 2 supreme leaders in all of that time, would seem antithetical to the vast constituents of this forum. It would be like celebrating the Republican party National Convention.
Crunchy Frog
(26,722 posts)Normally you don't see that sort of volume of commentary on how bad Iran is. It's only when someone steps up to defend it that a "disproportionate" amount of posts gets generated. If we had a significant contingent of otherwise progressive DUers who were frequently defending or justifying the Iranian government and its policies, we would probably have a volume of Iran posts comparable to the volume of I/P posts that we have. If things got contentious enough, the subject would probably even get its own separate forum.
In a similar sense, I think you see a "disproportionate" amount of posting on Israel because there's a sizeable contingent of DU posters who defend or justify Israeli policies that most progressives would generally see as indefensible.
Interestingly, in that Iran thread, there are a number of posts accusing DUers of "hating" the entire Iranian people on the basis of their criticism of the Iranian regime.
I find the parallels to be quite revealing. You may be too invested in your own interpretations to see what I'm getting at, but maybe not.
pelsar
(12,283 posts)no i'm hardly "offended" just fascinated at the way there are those that claim they are only concerned about the Palestinians welfare and then somehow ignore those Palestinians in Lebanon and their way they are treated for example.
perhaps if they made it clear that in fact its not all of the Palestinians and the way they are treated, just those under the israelis, then at least we could get an explanation and learn what it is about the israelis that get them so "worked up."
and then we would understand why, when the Lebanese bomb the trapped Palestenians in their camp, very little is written about it...and its quickly put in the back news
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)"and then we would understand why, when the Lebanese bomb the trapped Palestenians in their camp, very little is written about it...and its quickly put in the back news"
well it could be that Israel is holding the key as it were as it is Israel that prevents a Palestinian state in the West Bank (I'll wait for the imaginative denials) and that if there were a Palestinian state then the refugee problem may well be solved, but I know it would be so, so very much 'simpler' if those other Arabs would just take the bothersome Palestinian Arabs off Israels hands because we all know an Arab is an Arab is an Arab......right ?
note I feel the possibility of claims that a Palestinian state will not allow Palestinian refugees to live in Palestine that meme was floated a while ago with the ProIsrael rightwing sources to prove it at least to the susceptible
pelsar
(12,283 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:08 AM - Edit history (3)
Lebanese bombing the Palestinians trapped in their camp because of Lebanese laws keep them there, is the fault of israel?
....and you really expect me to take your posts seriously?. I guess the Lebanese didn't really have a choice but to kill those Palestinians because its Israel "made them do it."
hey about the Syrians killing Syrians?..is that too Israels fault? The Jordanians in Black September...i believe about 10,000 died at the hands of the Jordanians..is that too israels fault?
didn't Kuwait kick out the Palestinians?....i guess that too is Israels fault.
hmm, tricky question..... how about when Hamas kills their own Palestinians, is that too Israels fault or is Palestinians killing Palestinians an internal matter and not israels fault...or is it? How about in the west bank or If Egypt kills Palestenains in Gaza, is that considered an israeli responsibility?
or maybe after all its not a "tricky question" ....just blame israel
__
I guess we can conclude that everything and anything that happens to the Palestinians is always Israels fault..and that is how we get to the "Original Sin Theory"
since israel was born in sin, at best it can only repent and continually for ever ask for forgiveness from the world for all of the pain and suffering it has caused....
whew at least we cleared up your world view (funny thing about that view, it has the strangest echoes of classic anti-semitism doesn't it, only with a twist.....
DUIC
(167 posts)Once Israel is destroyed, those palestnians will be safe from Lebanese Persecution. So.....when the Lebanese bomb palestinians in Lebanon, it is clearly the fault of the jews.