LGBT
Related: About this forumState Marriage Defense Act introduced in U.S. Senate Receives USCCB Endorsement
And here we go again....
http://www.usccb.org/news/2014/14-043.cfm
State Marriage Defense Act introduced in U.S. Senate Receives Strong Endorsement From USCCB Subcommittee Chairman
February 28, 2014
Archbishop Cordileone says federal government acting contrary to Supreme Court decision
Federal government ought to defer to state law where couples reside
Says state laws defining marriage as between a man and woman deserve respect
WASHINGTONArchbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, strongly endorsed the State Marriage Defense Act of 2014 (S. 2024) introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). A companion bill (H.R. 3829) was previously introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative Randy Weber (R-TX).
In a February 28 letter of support to Senator Cruz, Archbishop Cordileone noted that the Department of Justice is the most recent federal agency to use a place of celebration rule rather than a place of domicile rule when determining the validity of a marriage for purposes of federal rights, benefits, and privileges.
By employing a place of celebration rule, these agencies have chosen to ignore the law of the state in which people reside in determining whether they are married. The effect, if not the intent, of this choice is to circumvent state laws defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, said Archbishop Cordileone.
He noted that these federal agencies are acting contrary to the Supreme Court decision on the federal Defense of Marriage Act. The Supreme Courts decision last year in United States v. Windsor, however, requires the federal government to defer to state marriage law, not disregard it. He concluded the bill is necessary because it would remedy this problem by requiring the federal government, consistent with Windsor, to defer to the marriage law of the state in which people actually reside when determining whether they are married for purposes of federal law. MORE
Beachwood
(106 posts)want to limit the freedoms and powers and rights of other human beings on this planet?
Have I got the correct group here?
Supposedly a-sexual men, all in the same philosophical club, all believing the same fairytales... and they want to restrict the rights of other human beings?
Have I got this correct? Why is not most of America laughing at the USCCB?
Does not the USCCB understand the concept of freedom?
CurtEastPoint
(18,680 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)The folks behind scores of lawsuits against the rights of women and LGBTs. The ones who have joined with RW evangelicals and Republicans (including Tea Partiers) to fight non-discrimination laws, contraception and reproductive rights, gay adoption rights, gay marriage et al. They are probably in mourning over their loss in Arizona.
But never mind me. I'm just a "hater".
Behind the Aegis
(54,052 posts)We have our work cut out for us, that is for sure.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Even on DU.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)as in The Godfather
I wouldn't put it past these people to leave a horse's head in someone's bed
just as corrupt as the Mafia