Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:44 AM Feb 2012

Regarding Ultrasounds: This is no way near being over, MANY battles in many states still to fight


<SNIP>

... while Virginia’s governor is backing away from the invasive bill, legislators in Alabama and Pennsylvania are considering the same ultrasound policy. Even though studies show that viewing an ultrasound does not change a woman’s mind about having an abortion, Pennsylvania Rep. Marcy Toepel (R) argued that “Getting an ultrasound is a good thing for pregnant women.”

Seven states already mandate that an abortion provider perform an ultrasound on women seeking abortions and provide women an opportunity to view the image.

<SNIP>

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/22/430032/virginia-governor-backs-off-state-sponsored-rape-ultrasound-bill-promises-review-measure/


IMPORTANT: Look at the CHART on page two HERE: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RFU.pdf

And regarding Texas: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/state/headlines/20120206-judge-lifts-ban-on-texas-abortion-sonogram-law.ece

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regarding Ultrasounds: This is no way near being over, MANY battles in many states still to fight (Original Post) Tx4obama Feb 2012 OP
I was wondering if they purposely over reached on invasive ultrasound? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #1
I think they are making the cost Ilsa Feb 2012 #2
+1 JoeyT Feb 2012 #3
Yes, it's about cost first. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #4

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
1. I was wondering if they purposely over reached on invasive ultrasound?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:55 AM
Feb 2012

Allowed all of the outrage to focus on that aspect of the bill, so when they switched to topical ultrasound the focus on the actual bill would dissipate? It's still an unacceptable intrusion on rights of women to control their own decisions, no matter what technology is used in the process.

Ilsa

(61,720 posts)
2. I think they are making the cost
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 08:19 AM
Feb 2012

of getting an abortion so expensive, they are hoping women can't afford it anymore.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
3. +1
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:56 AM
Feb 2012

That was my thought as well. That way they can hurt women and disproportionately hurt the poor at the same time. Pretty much their two favorite activities.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
4. Yes, it's about cost first.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:59 PM
Feb 2012

It's little different from states which imposed waiting periods or restrictions on where early abortions can be performed. Anything to make it more difficult is the underlying sentiment.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Regarding Ultrasounds: Th...