Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumTalks With Gun Control Advocates Seeking To Ban Gun Sales On Social Sites
Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense In America has partnered with Michael Bloombergs Mayors Against Illegal Guns to put pressure on Facebook to prohibit the private selling or trading of guns on its platforms a practice thats as widespread as it is unregulated.
Facebook and Instagram are enabling people to sell weapons, often with no questions asked and no background checks required, said Mayors Against Illegal Guns spokesperson Erika Soto Lamb.
Lamb cited a recent sting operation in Storm Lake, Iowa, where a convicted felon tried to exchange an assault rifle for a handgun via Facebook. In this case, the gun dealer was an undercover officer, and the 21-year-old felon was arrested and jailed.
[center][/center]
http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/02/21/facebook-and-instagram-in-talks-with-gun-control-advocates-seeking-to-ban-gun-sales-on-social-sites/
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)As you are fond of saying "I think that's pretty telling" that the major players include a often right wing paternalistic authoritarian who leads a collection of often corrupt mayors, a former Monsanto executive, a senator who loved the PATRIOT Act, thinks "only authorized journalists" should have first amendment protections and is the wife of a defense contractor/war profiteer.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Internet sales are not "unregulated"; different states allow different types of transactions, if they allow them at all.
What is against the law is against the law, and using FB or twitter or anything else to do anything illegal is still illegal.
Now, where it isn't illegal to publish a firearm for sale, then signs in a window, a classified add, or a posting on Facebook should not be a problem.
And, of course, background checks should be required of all such transactions, but that's not what this is about.
What a joke.
sarisataka
(18,883 posts)To do as they choose. Are many firearm sales posted their.
Why is it two "influential gun control groups" ? They formally merged, assuming they were ever separate...
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)It's fascist, it's unAmerican, it's pathetic, and it isn't being paid for by progressive groups or individuals.
What a joke, and what a bunch of suckers people are to buy into it.
sarisataka
(18,883 posts)Though I don't fully agree. MAIG ccan lobby just as the NRA or any other group can. Carriers can give No Guns= No $ cards to stores which prohibit carry. On yhat level it is the same. Facebook members can let their opinion be known. To think this will stop all internet sales is fantasy.
I disagree about progressive groups. Nothing about MAIG or any of its puppets is pprogressive ; though some progressives seem to like the idea of giving money to the billionaire creator of stop and frisk. Can't see the forest because of the trees I guess.
I completely agree with your summation.