Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,483 posts)
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 06:48 PM Feb 2014

323 killed by rifle fire in 2011

That includes "assault/military style" rifles like the AR-15.
728 killed with hands, feet...
496 killed with clubs, hammers...
1,694 killed with knives or other sharp objects.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8

Is it time to demand that those who carry hammers get permits?
Should Home Depot need to be licensed to sell deadly weapons and have NICS access?
Should Kitchen Kapers in the mall require ID and BGCs?


3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
The current system is fine with a few tweaks
1 (33%)
Butter knives should require permits
2 (67%)
Owning paintball equipment should require an SSBI with polygraph
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Interesting that the banners want to ban the tools that would be most useful in defending ourselves
Mon Feb 24, 2014, 10:34 PM
Feb 2014

independent of the police or armies.

Very interesting.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
5. Get back to me when you and your ilk are honest enough
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 03:44 PM
Mar 2014

To admit you want to ban all handguns. All we hear about is the infanticidal black rifle with a 30 round classroom clip, and a shoulder thing that goes up, being sprayed from the hip with more thrusts per squeeze.

Who now dear friend is trying to mislead?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
9. Well said. How quickly some forget what they themselves have posted:
Sat Mar 29, 2014, 04:32 PM
Mar 2014
There can be no fruitful political discussion with people who are insincere or hiding their views


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024744231

Straw Man

(6,626 posts)
6. Because he was addressing the ever-popular "assault weapons" bans.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 03:51 PM
Mar 2014

You know -- the attempts to ban or otherwise control the AR-15? Which is a ... wait for it ... rifle.

Mislead? Not at all.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,483 posts)
8. I was most directly addressing pro-control themes regarding AR type rifles
Sat Mar 29, 2014, 04:13 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sat Mar 29, 2014, 10:46 PM - Edit history (1)

Some pro-control statistics refer to overall firearm deaths and lead the reader/listener to conclude that banning certain rifles, such as the AR-15 would make a difference. In plain fact, your reply here helps illustrate my point. Weapons other than rifles are used incredibly more often in the commission of a crime. With that in mind, new laws regarding rifles will be largely ineffective in the fight against crime.

While I am against the death penalty, I strongly favor removing folks with a history of violent convictions, pending charges or open warrants for the same from the pool of permitted buyers. Most of the effect of criminal laws is not in prevention but conviction. Most laws provide criteria to make both prosecution and jury decisions more straightforward.

The current existence of AR type rifles (and others) with and without the various "assault weapon" attributes and magazines of various capacities have been sold for years. Those in criminal possession will be mostly unaffected by new laws. Trying to prevent murder with clever laws aimed at tools used in less than one crime in 25, is a distraction and a waste.

Most handguns accept magazines with capacities of 7 to 17 rounds. Handguns are ideal for personal protection because they are compact and easier to use in indoors. This same attribute makes a handgun (with certain notable exceptions)...



...easier to conceal which criminals may find useful. Concealability is sought by millions of non-criminal citizens and the CCW permit was designed with the idea that lawful citizens be enabled to defend themselves. Most states require those that carry concealed to have a permit. Those states often mandate certain standards of knowledge and skill to obtain one.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
7. I'm confused. The knife I use for butter has a,barely discernible
Sat Mar 29, 2014, 10:31 AM
Mar 2014

Serrated edge that can't cut cheese. Is that a picatinny rail (illegal under California's Salted Butter Ban), or a pilonidal cyst scratcher (legal in most states if under 1.5&quot ? No one's had a buy-back for these devices or I would have gladly sold my set, and put a down-payment on an approved smooth bore spreader. And I can't even sell the damned things in Georgia due, you know, to my legal use of this weapon.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»323 killed by rifle fire ...