Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:27 PM Jun 2015

Court Strikes Down Law That Let NRA Sue Pa. Cities

(cross posting from LBN)

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer

A Commonwealth Court has struck down the new state law that let the NRA — and other third parties — sue Pennsylvania cities for their gun restrictions.

The law is "unconstitutional and void," the court said in Thursday morning's ruling.

The law — known as Act 192 — passed last year, had been challenged by a coalition of cities (including Philadelphia) and lawmakers. The challenge was based on the process used to pass it: The bill was originally written to create penalties for the theft of copper wiring — late during the legislative session it was gutted and repurposed as a gun bill. Critics said that violated the Pennsylvania Constitution, which requires that a bill not be amended in a way that changes its original purpose, and that bills passed by the legislature contain only a single subject.

That order should bring an end to several lawsuits that had been filed under Act 192; the NRA had sued the cities of Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Lancaster under the act, but the suit had been stayed pending the Commonwealth Court's ruling on the act's legitimacy.

Read more: http://www.phillymag.com/news/2015/06/25/nra-law-pennsylvania-struck-down


This lobbying arm of the GOP can be beaten.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. Constitutional adherence is always a good thing. You know what else is in the PA state constitution?
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:38 PM
Jun 2015
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defence of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
2. Imagine that the court won't let the hand that feeds it be sued.
Fri Jun 26, 2015, 08:30 AM
Jun 2015

I've always wondered why cities wanted easy victims on the streets. What is it that make them believe disarming folks makes them safer???

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
3. As I said in another thread:
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 09:13 AM
Jun 2015

I'm cool with local gun control. Most people in my state are pro-RKBA. I would suggest, though, that your side won't be happy with local control since you will lose almost every time.

If you want local referendums put to a vote of the people, that's fine with me.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. "Our side" just took down the Dixie Swastika and hoisted the Rainbow Flag. Next up, the NRA.
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:25 AM
Jun 2015

Your side is doomed, the long arc of justice is not yet done.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
5. Bullshit.
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:28 AM
Jun 2015

Liberals and progressives of all stripes support the RKBA. Your implication that people who demand our constitutional rights are somehow against others having all of their rights as well is disingenuous at best. But then you already know that.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
6. "Doomed" LoL We've been hearing that sad song for over a decade now
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:36 AM
Jun 2015

One blowhard after another shows up, predicts the imminent end of the NRA and the repeal of the 2nd amendment.

"The Tide is Turning" has been a favorite bumper sticker in Bansalot since it's inception. Still waiting for that big change in public opinion.

But I'm glad to see that you finally agree that a 5-4 SCOTUS decision is the law of the land, just like Heller and McDonald.

One decision in a state court, that can still be appealed, is not really a trend you want to jump on too eagerly.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Court Strikes Down Law Th...