After all, empty holsters is a clear exercise of freedom of expression.

Libertarians suck.

yup

There were no guns there, just empty holsters. Try to do more than rip and paste.

yup

"rude posters" around here.

This is political speech. Maybe if they try it on for size, they might like it.

Probably Kydex as well.

Maybe his mother was frightened by a calfskin once?

I have noticed that many of the same people that don't like the 2nd amendment like Rahm and his supporters aren't too fond of the 1st either.

can you read minds?

didn't you say you know a lot of people who wants to go back to the bad old days?

they can't logically be both
wasn't state governments that passed Jim Crow laws that infringed on individual freedom. Libertarians are just right wing anarchists. The two are mutually exclusive (if they actually think about it.)
never really thought about it or just stupid.
But then you like to equate all "toters" (which included at least a couple of freedom riders, civil rights activists including a former first lady.) in the same league as Lester Maddox because he had a revolver while the other goons had pick handles.
How good are you at spotting irony?

check out these links:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117216599#post30
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cruikshank

When defending local gun bans like Chicago, Brady lawyers list Cruskshank first, which was one of those "states rights" rulings. Basically, it said that the states could ignore the 1A and 2A. It also made the federal civil rights laws unenforceable, paving the way for Jim Crow. Civil rights lawyers have been hacking at various parts of it since the 1930s. McDonald v Chicago finally killed it.
fucking ironic isn't it?

(note to jury, I am not saying that gun control advocates are racists. I am not saying they were defending the more despicable parts of the Cruikshank, which have been struck down for years. I am simply pointing out that cases like McDonald maybe the last battle between "states rights" and incorporation. All am I doing is pointing out the irony.)

I'm not Libertarian, anarchist, or anything like that. Simply pointing out the irony.

Right?

I dislike the libertarian mindset - the idea that if you completely deregulate industry, for example, that industry will just magically do the right thing with regards to everything outside of making a profit.

Regulation is why we have clean water, safe food and drugs, and at least some rules to protect workers.

That said, there is no reason why a man can walk down main street surrounded by hundreds of his fellow citizens while carrying a gun and can't do it on a college campus.