Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,593 posts)
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 09:15 PM Nov 2019

He Wrote 'Kill All Women,' but a Judge Returned His Guns

Source: New York Times

He Wrote ‘Kill All Women,’ but a Judge Returned His Guns

Authorities around the country have collided with the limits of laws designed to seize weapons from those who might be a threat to public safety.

By Mike Baker
Nov. 18, 2019
Updated 3:54 p.m. ET

REDMOND, Wash. — The authorities in the Seattle area came across an alarming photo on social media at the beginning of October. It showed a man holding two AK-47-style rifles. The caption above read: “one ticket for joker please.”

With only a couple of days left before the opening of the “Joker” movie, law enforcement agencies scrambled to assess the threat level of the message. As detectives waded through the man’s online history, they encountered additional troubling posts: Charels Donnelly, 23, talked about threatening his mother with a gun and described fantasies about hurting women.

“i will shoot any woman any time for any reason,” he posted on Twitter.

Thanks to the state’s fledgling “red flag” law meant to help prevent gun violence, police in Redmond won a temporary court order to seize Mr. Donnelly’s weapons from his home: three handguns and three rifles, including an AK-47-style rifle and its accompanying magazines. But a couple of weeks later, he returned to court with a lawyer, testified that his online posts were jokes meant only for his friends, and asked for his guns back.

A judge agreed.

Facing a spate of calamitous mass shootings, including three in the last week in California, 17 states have adopted red flag laws as a vital new tool to seize weapons from people they deem imminently dangerous. But as more authorities rush to take pre-emptive action against a rise in gun deaths, they are finding themselves colliding with the Constitution and the limitations of those statutes.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/18/us/gun-seizures.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He Wrote 'Kill All Women,' but a Judge Returned His Guns (Original Post) Eugene Nov 2019 OP
"..his online posts were jokes..." dchill Nov 2019 #1
Many Judges need to be removed from the bench. They're as bad as the Def's..n/t monmouth4 Nov 2019 #2
It's not the judge's fault. Haggis for Breakfast Nov 2019 #3

Haggis for Breakfast

(6,831 posts)
3. It's not the judge's fault.
Mon Nov 18, 2019, 10:33 PM
Nov 2019

There are laws that even he/she MUST follow. Given the wording of the law, the judge had no recourse but to return the man's guns.

It is the LAWS that must be changed.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»He Wrote 'Kill All Women,...