Several cyber security initiatives lost after Snowden's NSA leaks
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-snowden-cyber-20140202,0,5845248.storyExperts say several cyber security initiatives have been halted by Snowden's leaks of NSA data, leaving the U.S. more vulnerable.
Several cyber security initiatives lost after Snowden's NSA leaks
By Ken Dilanian
February 1, 2014, 6:51 p.m.
WASHINGTON Early last year, as Edward Snowden was preparing to disclose classified documents he had purloined from National Security Agency computers in Hawaii, the NSA director, Gen. Keith Alexander, was gearing up to sell Congress and the public on a proposal for the NSA to defend private U.S. computer networks against cyber attacks.
Alexander wanted to use the NSA's powerful tools to scan Internet traffic for malicious software code. He said the NSA could kill the viruses and other digital threats without reading consumers' private emails, texts and Web searches.
The NSA normally protects military and other national security computer networks. Alexander also wanted authority to prevent hackers from penetrating U.S. banks, defense industries, telecommunications systems and other institutions to crash their networks or to steal intellectual property worth billions of dollars.
But after Snowden, a contractor, began leaking NSA systems for spying in cyberspace that went public in June, Alexander's proposal was a political nonstarter, felled by distrust of his agency's fearsome surveillance powers in the seesawing national debate over privacy and national security.
djean111
(14,255 posts)internet?
SamKnause
(13,114 posts)I am so sick of "our" military brass.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
loudsue
(14,087 posts)We are being ruled by a bunch of megalomaniacs.
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)The NSA's ability to snoop unimpeded has depended on the consent of the snooped since the invention of free, high-quality public key encryption. Not only security can depend on obscurity, so can surveillance.
And THAT is why this wretched excess on the NSA's part was foolish. Had they been circumspect, this capability could have been retained. Now it is gone. And until they get that Quantum Computer working well enough to break modern encryption algorithms, it will stay gone.
RC
(25,592 posts)Or is this more to protect them?
The question that raises is just what would they consider to be "...viruses and other digital threats..."? A web site containing verbiage decrying the NSA overreach? A web site with factual news about what the government is doing or has done in our name? People's E-mails about a meeting for planning a protest against the government? Just what digital threats to whom are they talking about?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)This is just another, not very clever, angle to demonize the Snowden leaks.
Nothing is stopping them from starting this program.
It would have probably bought them a ton of goodwill if they had.
Going on about how that now that the NSA is in the political crosshairs they can't do a program that actually benefits the general public because of Snowden?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)They wanted more public funds, you see.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)But that is not the point. Alexander and his blackmail racket is desperately trying to deflect attention from their unconstitutional bullshit.