Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Top Tester Tells Navy To Test Carrier, Destroyer Defenses With Real Missiles & Explosions
http://breakingdefense.com/2014/01/top-tester-tells-navy-to-test-carrier-destroyer-defenses-with-real-missiles-explosions/A US Navy carrier, the USS Roosevelt, undergoing full-ship shock trials using live explosives.
Top Tester Tells Navy To Test Carrier, Destroyer Defenses With Real Missiles & Explosions
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
on January 31, 2014 at 4:33 PM
Youd expect the nations top weapons tester to be a stickler about testing. But theres rigorous testing and then theres lets shoot cruise missiles at you and see what happens.
Its not that the Navy is wimpy about testing. The service conducts full-ship shock trials like the USS Roosevelt test pictured above, where it sets off a huge explosion next to a ship with a test crew aboard, as in this video of the destroyer USS Winston Churchill:
The Pentagons famously tough Director of Operational Test and Evaluation wants to Navy to speed up such shock testing on its new aircraft carrier, the cutting-edge and high-cost USS Gerald Ford. (More on that below). But a shock trial tests the ships structural strength, not its ability to shoot down incoming anti-ship missiles moving at hundreds or even thousands of miles per hour.
Even DOT&E doesnt want the Navy to shoot live missiles directly at ships with live people on them: They want the Navy to build a new unmanned test ship and fire the missiles at that. Before the Navy can really say its latest self-defense systems are ready for prime time, DOT&E argues in its latest annual report (click here for full coverage), the military needs to test them under the most realistic conditions: at sea, installed on a real ship, with real missiles inbound. You just have no real sailors onboard in case the defenses dont quite work as planned.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1529 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Tester Tells Navy To Test Carrier, Destroyer Defenses With Real Missiles & Explosions (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Feb 2014
OP
Why not populate the ship with the builders engineers, planners and executives.
LiberalArkie
Feb 2014
#1
Back in the 1980's or 90's, when the Exocet was all the rage, a small report came out...
TheBlackAdder
Feb 2014
#2
LiberalArkie
(15,732 posts)1. Why not populate the ship with the builders engineers, planners and executives.
TheBlackAdder
(28,242 posts)2. Back in the 1980's or 90's, when the Exocet was all the rage, a small report came out...
I can't remember what trade press it was in, but the gist of the article is below.
China was heavily investing in anti-ship missiles capable of supersonic flight. Their goal is not to have a large navy, but one that can simultaneously fire dozens of anti-ship missiles into a carrier group, overwhelming their anti-missile defenses.
Even if the US Navy can test a ship's capability to defend against one missile:
What happens if an enemy simultaneously unleashes a slew of anti-ship missiles at a ship or carrier group?