Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BridgeTheGap

(3,615 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:44 PM Feb 2012

The Crisis of the African-American Intellectual: What's to Be Learned From West v. Harris Perry

In 1967, Harold Cruse wrote the fabled book, The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual. In the book, Cruse mapped the unsettled space between intellectuals and an increasingly fragmented set of social movements. I argue here we are at such a place, as we have on one hand a pragmatic Obama administration under siege from right wing forces and on the other hand black intellectuals trying to articulate the voices of what are absent mass social movements. This creates a crisis that plays itself out in peculiar ways. The conflict between Professors Melissa Harris-Perry and Cornel West is one such area.

As academics and scholars, our job is to teach and develop scholarship that aids human kind. For African-American scholars we carry the additional burden of trying to provide a deeper understanding of the issues that confront the black community in the United States and sometimes beyond. Our task is to illuminate, to provide analysis and critique that elevates the discussion and provides the public of all races with a better understanding of issues and ideas for a way forward.

But we are ciphers. Unlike W.E.B. DuBois and even some of the intellectuals in the period that Cruse wrote about, black intellectuals are not leaders in the way we once might have claimed. With the access to the ballot, African Americans have elected city councilmen, mayors, senators and even a president. We have supported politicians of all races for ideological and strategic reason. And the African-American community no longer must rely on unelected artists, academics, athletes and entertainers to speak for us. This situation is at once liberating and scary. While we are rightfully angry to decry those who suggest American is post-racial or celebrities who avoid speaking out on issues, it is also liberating for non-elected black folk to not speak for us.

That is why the recent comments published in Diverse Issues in Higher Education about Professor Melissa Harris-Perry by Professor Cornel West so saddened me. West's reference to Melissa Harris-Perry as a "fraud" is bad but the use of the adjective "treacherous" invokes a gender dog whistle that harkens back to the concept sexually available black woman cozying up to the master. Boyce Watkins, in his attack on Harris-Perry, on his website doubles down on the Jezebel stereotype by accusing Harris-Perry of "whoring herself out." What could have been an interesting discussion about black politics in the Obama era, has degenerated into a series of ad hominem attacks. We might have had a debate a la the high minded engagement with Michael Dawson's essay on Black Politics published in a recent issue of the Boston Review. Instead, we have been treated to ever deepening ad hominem attacks. Academic versions of street level put downs.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-sawyer/cornel-west-melissa-harris-perry_b_1285666.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Crisis of the African-American Intellectual: What's to Be Learned From West v. Harris Perry (Original Post) BridgeTheGap Feb 2012 OP
I like Melissa H-P!!! socialindependocrat Feb 2012 #1
West and Watkins ought to be ashamed of themselves! JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #2
West and this watkins person are just jealous SemperEadem Feb 2012 #3
Since Obama became president Number23 Feb 2012 #5
I'm really not sure who Mark Sawyer is Number23 Feb 2012 #4

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
1. I like Melissa H-P!!!
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:12 PM
Feb 2012

She's just had her show for a week now and she already has
someone trying to tear her down. Some people open
their mouths and attack others just to make themselves feel
superior. Let her get her feet wet and give her suggestions as to what you would like to see her include in her show. We get enough
of this crap from watching the Repubs tear each other down. Let's support each other in our growth and development so we can create a better America!

(edit for spelling)

JustAnotherGen

(32,046 posts)
2. West and Watkins ought to be ashamed of themselves!
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 04:55 PM
Feb 2012
West's reference to Melissa Harris-Perry as a "fraud" is bad but the use of the adjective "treacherous" invokes a gender dog whistle that harkens back to the concept sexually available black woman cozying up to the master. Boyce Watkins, in his attack on Harris-Perry, on his website doubles down on the Jezebel stereotype by accusing Harris-Perry of "whoring herself out."


Isn't that funny - seeing as she published Sister Citizen just last year.

I don't think those are 'odd' or out of left field descriptions by either West or Watkins.

They read her book, then smacked her in the face with it. They knew PRECISELY what those words meant when they wrote them. Shame on them both.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
3. West and this watkins person are just jealous
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 11:52 PM
Feb 2012

and intimidated by MHP's success. They're mad that no one handed them the same thing.

Were MSNBC to offer either one of them a show, they'd "sell out" just as fast. Only MHP didn't sell out. She had been an analyst for the network for both Olberman's and Maddow's programs (perhaps Lawrence's and Ed's shows, too) for some time; then she served as a fill in host for Maddow and acquitted herself admirably enough for them to offer her (and also Chris Hayes doing the same thing) her own show.

That's not selling out. That's being recognized for a job well done. There is no reason in the world why she should not do the program.

both of these men owe not only MHP an apology, but every black women because when they smeared MHP, they smeared all of us.

Cornell West has lost A. LOT. of my respect after this sexist, vicious, vulgar stunt of his.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
5. Since Obama became president
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 08:31 PM
Feb 2012

Corny has been all over the place. Racist comments ("Obama fears free black men" whateverthefuck that means); a touch of anti-Semitism ("Obama hangs around too many Jews&quot and now this.

That brother becoming president appears to have caused Corny to have lost his ever loving mind. And I used to be one of his BIGGEST fans and defenders.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
4. I'm really not sure who Mark Sawyer is
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 08:26 PM
Feb 2012

But I don't understand why he thinks he needs to jump into this fray and give people "advice" on how they need to be criticizing one another.

To be fair, Harris-Perry only responded to West's statements, and West didn't offer a terribly coherent critique of POTUS, but for what it's worth it is clear that West took Harris-Perry's response personally. It is also the case that Harris-Perry focused on the weaker parts of Cornel West's argument rather than the areas of more legitimate concern. A better tact would have been to address the strongest aspects of West's argument and offered a critique of his best positions rather than his worst positions.


Errr.. who asked you, Mark? I think his piece is much stronger when he critiques the criticisms lodged at this administration:

They desire messianic leadership that is transformative in its articulation of progressive values. For them the President's compromises undermine progressive arguments and more progressive stances on a range of issues. Some just want to see results. The fact of black unemployment regardless of how long the trend has existed is a critique of President Obama in and of itself. These critics tend to ignore context a la West's appearance on the Ed Schulz show discussing health care. When West was confronted with the fact that there were not fifty votes in the Senate for a public option, West simply changed the subject. Or on the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), critics tend to ignore the fact the bill passed with a veto proof majority.

...These types are happiest when the President is talking tough but getting nothing done a la his proposed jobs bill.


Still an interesting read. Not sure why it was needed, but not a bad read.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»The Crisis of the African...