Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baseball

Not Heidi

(1,361 posts) Mon May 6, 2024, 02:35 AM May 6

Would you support a rule that required owners to sell?

The rule would force an owner to sell if, for example, the team ended two or three consecutive seasons at, say .350 or .400.

It's late and I'm not feeling very creative, but maybe you can come up with some ideas.

I'd support this rule. Maybe I'll send a note to Rob Manfred.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would you support a rule that required owners to sell? (Original Post) Not Heidi May 6 OP

hot dogs??? elleng May 6 #1

Yes if they offered chili dogs Duncanpup May 6 #3

No. LisaM May 6 #2

Can't require a performance rule if there's not a salary cap or revenue sharing Auggie May 6 #4

elleng

(131,735 posts)

1. hot dogs???

Reply to Not Heidi (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2024, 03:00 AM

May 6

Duncanpup

(13,013 posts)

3. Yes if they offered chili dogs

Reply to elleng (Reply #1)

Mon May 6, 2024, 05:25 AM

May 6

LisaM

(27,889 posts)

2. No.

Reply to Not Heidi (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2024, 03:18 AM

May 6

Why would you want such a rule? Three years isn't long enough to rebuild a team, and with as many teams as there are now, there are always going to be teams at the bottom.

Auggie

(31,275 posts)

4. Can't require a performance rule if there's not a salary cap or revenue sharing

Reply to Not Heidi (Original post)

Mon May 6, 2024, 08:54 AM

May 6

The draft, though, has been altered to not reward teams that intentionally underperform. This is a good rule, IMO.

Reply to this discussion