Religion
Related: About this forumChurch Elder Allegedly Killed His Wife Because His Religion Wont Allow Divorce
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2018/01/26/church-elder-allegedly-killed-his-wife-because-his-religion-wont-allow-divorce/
Church Elder Allegedly Killed His Wife Because His Religion Wont Allow Divorce
January 26, 2018 by David G. McAfee
What do you do when youre a high-ranking official in a church that doesnt approve of divorce, but youve been cheating on your wife? For one man, murder was apparently his only option.
Stephen Allwine, a church elder at the United Church of God, has been charged with killing his wife because divorce wasnt an option in his conservative church. I guess he either forgot that the Bible itself says Thou shall not murder, or he was more scared of earthly judgment from his church than punishment from God.
Prosecutors say Allwine, an Internet technology specialist, was using the infidelity website Ashley Madison to cheat on his wife, Amy. When his position in the church prevented him from separation, he began researching ways to kill her, including hiring a contract killer on the dark web using Bitcoin.
Allwine is accused of using an anonymous alias, dogdaygod, to hire an Albanian mafia group to off his wife. When that plan failed, he apparently took matters into his own hands, shooting her with a gun he bought three months earlier.But the dark Web machinations suddenly took on new significance in November 2016 when Amy Allwine was discovered dead on the floor of her bedroom. Initially thought to be a suicide, police soon suspected foul play. Within months, they would allege Stephen Allwine was actually dogdaygod. He had killed his wife after Besa Mafia failed to come through.
These kinds of homicides, sadly, arent unusual, but what makes this case stand out is that Allwines motive seems to be almost entirely based on his religion. He went on trial this week for premeditated first-degree murder, and the prosecution says his faith and position in the church led him to kill.
Emphasis added.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/01/25/a-church-elders-ashley-madison-affairs-led-him-to-the-dark-web-and-murder-police-say/?utm_term=.f978211ec08a
longship
(40,416 posts)I have nothing left to say about religion.
dchill
(38,633 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)a dozen, and if they won't go away, you can just kill them.
Of course, if this nimrod had actually been smart, he would have told her he wanted HER to divorce HIM, which she could have done on her own and the church could say nothing about it since she was initiating a one-sided divorce and he couldn't stop it. But that would have cost him some money, so . . . .
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)I mean, there are cases for a man having a God-Given right to off his wife all over the Old Testament ... perhaps he discovered she wasn't a virgin when they wed and her father couldn't pay the required 30 shekels of silver in restitution or whatnot ... And sounds like he couldn't find ANYone to join in on a stoning, even if he paid them ... sheesh ... what IS a good Christian Man to do?
Probably claim he thought with Trump as President, this sort of thing had become legal ... and he'll probably find some deplorables from Alabama to fund his legal defense, too ...
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)killed his wife; I think his original claim was suicide
yankeepants
(1,979 posts)BELIEVE. POWER. BELIEVE.
Igel
(35,393 posts)Not so okay with remarriage; there are strict limits on that.
But if he wanted to remain an elder, he couldn't divorce. Divorce would have meant losing that title.
It wasn't a doctrine against divorce that was the problem, it was having standards for an optional title within the organization.
The church I was in a long time ago had a similar sort of issue. A lay minister was too proud of his position to admit the truth. To hold the position, people had to be able to have at least some respect for what he said when he gave advice in private or from the lectern. He had to uphold the organization's principles and values, and one way to show this was to have a good reputation and to have a well-run household. He didn't have the latter, and so he manufactured the former. In the end, he helped create the circumstances for several people being kicked out, numerous families leaving, and another lay minister's resignation. Some of the best seeming candidates for these posts are the worst because of their pride and vanity, and the way they need to feel respected and loved no matter what rot they have to hide. And the truth eventually came out, but only after the son had left home so the father's "dignity" could stay intact and he could continue to think people respected him. By then I was long gone, but still knew people that attended.
The other option is that he wanted to marry somebody else. In which case he could have divorced, but if he remarried for any but a handful of reasons that often can't be stretched to apply to a given situation his church membership would have been at risk, but his position as elder untenable. If his wife was dead, however, he could remarry.
(Just google 'united church divorce' and the appropriate links pop up.)
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)It's almost like there's some sort of history of this sort of thing.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Guess one way or another I'd still have needed an attorney.