Science
Related: About this forumEd Weiler Says He Quit NASA Over Cuts to Mars Program
Next week, President Barack Obama will propose a $300 million cut in NASA's planetary science programs as part of his 2013 request for the agency, ScienceInsider has learned. If adopted by Congress, the 20% cut in planetary science would in all likelihood shelve NASA's ability to participate in two Mars missions to be carried out in partnership with the European Space Agency (ESA). And the former head of NASA's science mission says that the targeting of the ExoMars program by White House budget officials was the final straw leading to his resignation last fall.
"The Mars program is one of the crown jewels of NASA," says Ed Weiler. "In what irrational, Homer Simpson world would we single it out for disproportionate cuts?"
Weiler's resignation in September caught the space science community by surprise. But he says it was the culmination of a soul-sapping and ultimately unsuccessful battle with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on how to accommodate the rising cost of the James Webb Space Telescope within an overall agency budget being squeezed by efforts to reduce federal spending and shrink the deficit. "It all left a very bad taste," Weiler told ScienceInsider this morning from his house in Vero Beach, Florida.
The story begins with a 2008 agreement between NASA and ESA to share the costs of sending the Trace Gas Orbiter to Mars in a 2016 mission, followed by a European rover and a U.S. rover in 2018. Last week, ESA officials said that they were in talks with Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, to fly those missions without any help from NASA on the assumption that NASA was likely to pull out of the partnership.
more
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/ed-weiler-says-he-quit-nasa-over.html
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Don't give the drama queen the attention he wants.
We have problems here on Earth and spaceships to Mars don't make the cut.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)xocet
(3,875 posts)You do know that the online world that you post in is dependent on science for its existence, don't you?
Your snark is online because science has been funded, and people have cared to learn things about the world. Ed Weiler appears to be one of those people who care about advancing human knowledge. You should not be so judgmental.
Of course, you may run down science all you want and complain that scientists and engineers who care are 'drama queens', but please do have the decency to not use technology like transistors and lasers, lest you be a hypocrite.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)The Navy came very, very close to losing its futuristic gun that shoots bullets with a giant electric charge. But while a congressional committee recommended axing the Electromagnetic Railgun in June, the program survived even if its still got to clear lots of technical hurdles before it can launch bullets from ships at hypersonic speed. And its not the only high-tech Navy project that looks like it (mostly) dodged the budget axe.
After years of testing a lab model at the Navy surface warfare center in Dahlgren, Virginia, the railgun a gun without moving parts that fires a round through a big burst of electricity is finally moving into a prototype phase. Next week, BAE Systems version of the railgun should arrive at Dahlgren for tests, followed in April by General Atomics version.
Meanwhile, Raytheon is developing the central nervous system of the railgun the battery package that stores and then blasts the energy to send a bullet through the barrel. A shipboard demonstration should be ready, tentatively, by 2019.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/02/rail-gun/
It's all about priorities, people!
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Celebration
(15,812 posts)Ed Weller is correct.