Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 11:57 AM Apr 2015

Road revolution by connecting vehicles: Computational framework for optimizing traffic flow

Road revolution by connecting vehicles: Computational framework for optimizing traffic flow

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencedaily/strange_science/~3/OYMe03R5BW4/150402114701.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email

Drivers trying to get to work or home in a hurry know traffic congestion wastes a lot of time, but it also wastes a lot of fuel. In 2011, congestion caused people in US urban areas to travel an extra 5.5 billion hours and purchase an extra 2.9 billion gallons of fuel costing $121 billion. But despite the tangle of vehicles at busy intersections and interstate ramps, most of the country's highways are open road with vehicles occupying only about 5 percent of road surface. Researchers envision vehicles exchanging information -- such as location, speed, and destination -- to generate individualized instructions for drivers.


...and yet another target for disruptive hackers...

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Road revolution by connecting vehicles: Computational framework for optimizing traffic flow (Original Post) Panich52 Apr 2015 OP
Why is it we always need new, expensive technology to solve a problem when Nay Apr 2015 #1
Really if drivers would use the every other car theory that yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #4
When did the price of gas go up to $40/gal? (2.9b gal/$121b) leveymg Apr 2015 #2
*and* "travel an extra 5.5 billion hours" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #5
Interesting site, here: enlightenment Apr 2015 #3
I can think of a system that can be considered "connected vehicles" Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2015 #6

Nay

(12,051 posts)
1. Why is it we always need new, expensive technology to solve a problem when
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:06 PM
Apr 2015

simpler solutions exist (trains, mass transit, work from home)? It seems that the only solutions that are allowed are ones that make private businesses extraordinarily wealthy. I think we need to fix THAT problem before we need to 'invest' in bigger, better technology.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
4. Really if drivers would use the every other car theory that
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 01:37 PM
Apr 2015

Would stop some of the long waits. I always thought their should be a law for that and if you don't let the car next to you go first a million dollar fine. Most reasons for traffic is selfish drivers. Not all but most. We can forget public transportation in any major way. Americans don't want it. I have heard it forever. The cities have increased riderships but the suburbs? Not so much. I do want it, but it is not realistic in our lifetime.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
2. When did the price of gas go up to $40/gal? (2.9b gal/$121b)
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:44 PM
Apr 2015

At that price point, I'll also take the train.

I personally feel uncomfortable with computer controlled speed, brakes or steering in cars. I can still do it myself, thank you.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,390 posts)
5. *and* "travel an extra 5.5 billion hours"
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:39 PM
Apr 2015

If you say their time costs an average $20/hour (a bit lower than the national figure), that's $110 billion, plus 2.9 billion gallons at $3.80 would get you $121 billion.

Having watched their simulation, I think I'd have to be blindfolded and sedated before I allowed a computer to take me across a junction at those speeds with those gaps.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Road revolution by connec...