Science
Related: About this forumThe origin of leap seconds, and why they should be abolished
WRITTEN BY
David Yanofsky
How many seconds have there been since January 1, 1972?
While that number is extremely large, it is pretty simply calculated. Multiply the number of years (and dont forget leap years!) by the number of days in a year by the number of hours in a day by the number of minutes in an hour by the number of seconds in a minute and voilà: 1,371,513,600 seconds as of midnight on June 29, 2015.
Except that thats not right. Were leaving out leap seconds. Leap seconds, you ask? Yes, leap seconds. There have been 26 of them, and number 27 is just around the corner: It will be added to global clocks at 1am London time on July 1.
The leap second is a near paradox. It befuddles all common definitions of time. Notionally, its a way to unify all our ways of measuring time. In reality, its just an attempt to preserve an old definition of time that has long since been superseded by newer methods. In the process, the leap secondthrough no fault of its ownputs at risk countless critical computer systems around the world. And that is forcing even the people who are charged with administering the worlds supply of leap seconds to consider getting rid of them altogether.
much more
http://qz.com/432787/the-origin-of-leap-seconds-and-why-they-should-be-abolished/
4139
(1,894 posts)petronius
(26,614 posts)Thanks for posting!
bananas
(27,509 posts)The singularity is here!
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)One year is not an integer-multiple of one day. One year is 365 days + 6 hours + X minutes + Y seconds. We normally don't count the small things, which means the calendar we use is shorter than the real astronomical calendar of seasons and sunrises/sunsets.
And to balance that out, we have to make our calendar a little bit longer from time to time.
Why is this supposed to be any more confusing than adding a day during leap-years????????????????????
bananas
(27,509 posts)When the group of Raptors crossed over the IDL, multiple computer systems crashed on the planes. Everything from fuel subsystems, to navigation and partial communications were completely taken offline. Numerous attempts were made to "reboot" the systems to no avail.
BadgerKid
(4,564 posts)Add or subtract 2? when crossing the IDL.
hunter
(38,354 posts)... high frequency trading ought to be eliminated by a tiny tax on trades, and perhaps the introduction of a bit of noise to discourage exploits that take advantage of artifacts in the signal.
Leap seconds don't make sense in the modern world. Anyone who needs a human friendly "local" time could just grab the common offset, which is how "time zones" basically work anyways.
From my perspective it wouldn't be bad if communities went back to some version of local time too.
It's not like everyone is sitting down to watch the evening news at the same time anymore.
Goodbye Walter Cronkite.
A little bit of chaos stirs things up, refreshes things. Too many of us are slaves to the clock.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)With 27 seconds in 43 years it seems to me that we could wait for each century mark to do the correction for about a minute of time. Or do the correction on the leap years. Then again I doubt I will live to be a hundred, give me all the time I have coming, I want it now!
caraher
(6,279 posts)I guarantee the answer will not be found here:
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)severing any remaining link between time keeping and the Earth and Sun. A scientist's and an engineer's dream, the time would depend only on the oscillation of atoms in the Naval Observatory's atomic clock, and would no longer have any relationship to the positions of the Earth, Sun, or Moon.
Save the leap seconds!
ThoughtCriminal
(14,057 posts)Change the Earth's rotation so that a day is always 86400 seconds. And while we're at it, let's fix the orbit around the Sun so that it is more circular and a complete orbit is always 365 Earth days (revised). Might as well fix that axial tilt thing too. Not sure what to do about the Moon. Having an off-kilter barycenter that gives us that complicated wobble thing. Maybe we can split the Moon into two equal mass satellites on opposite sides.
panader0
(25,816 posts)nothing happened, right?