Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,090 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2020, 08:24 AM Jan 2020

Satellite constellations harvest energy for near-total global coverage

From phys.org:



Think of it as a celestial parlor game: What is the minimum number of satellites needed to see every point on Earth? And how might those satellites stay in orbit and maintain continuous 24/7 coverage while contending with Earth's gravity field, its lumpy mass, the pull of the sun and moon, and pressure from solar radiation?

In the mid-1980s, researcher John E. Draim proposed what is generally considered to be the ideal solution: a four-satellite constellation. However, the amount of propellant needed to keep the satellites in place, and the ensuing cost, made the configuration unfeasible.

Now, a National Science Foundation-sponsored collaboration led by Patrick Reed, the Joseph C. Ford Professor of Engineering at Cornell University, has discovered the right combination of factors to make a four-satellite constellation possible, which could drive advances in telecommunication, navigation and remote sensing. And in an ingenious twist, the researchers accomplished this by making the forces that ordinarily degrade satellites instead work in their favor.

"One of the interesting questions we had was, can we actually transform those forces? Instead of degrading the system, can we actually flip it such that the constellation is harvesting energy from those forces and using them to actively control itself?" Reed said.

more ...
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Satellite constellations harvest energy for near-total global coverage (Original Post) Jim__ Jan 2020 OP
Beats the Hell out of putting up thousands of astronomical nuisances. eppur_se_muova Jan 2020 #1
My first thought after reading this essay was about Elon Musk's satellites. Jim__ Jan 2020 #2

eppur_se_muova

(36,307 posts)
1. Beats the Hell out of putting up thousands of astronomical nuisances.
Fri Jan 10, 2020, 11:43 AM
Jan 2020

Elon Musk, go to the back of the line and start over.

Jim__

(14,090 posts)
2. My first thought after reading this essay was about Elon Musk's satellites.
Fri Jan 10, 2020, 03:04 PM
Jan 2020

The essay in Nature does say that the costs of maintaining satellite systems are a major concern that may be addressed by this type of research.

An excerpt:

Satellite services fundamentally shape telecommunication, navigation, and remote sensing services that are vital to the global economy. Sustained space-based Earth observation is critical for understanding and addressing global scale challenges, such as poverty, urbanization, water security, climate change, and epidemiological risks, to human health1,2,3,4. Despite the intrinsic value of sustaining space-based satellite services, the National Research Council has repeatedly warned that critical space infrastructures are at risk of collapse4,5. International coordination challenges6 combined with uncertain budgetary policies exacerbate the risk of reaching tipping points where the loss of space infrastructure could have long lived, if not irreversible impacts on critical data systems. Sustaining and advancing satellite constellations costs ~$10,000 per pound (0.45?kg) launched7 with total lifecycle mission costs often exceeding billions of dollars8. A core goal of this study is to improve the value proposition for those interests that cannot yet sustain their own global satellite services. A critical factor for addressing this challenge is reducing the total mass-to-orbit.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Satellite constellations ...