2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDo you WANT Hillary Clinton to be indicted?
Just curious. I kind of understand being afraid about the chances, but it seems like a lot of people are rooting for it. Wondering what the numbers are.
29 votes, 5 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
12 (41%) |
|
No | |
15 (52%) |
|
Not Sure | |
2 (7%) |
|
5 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)and we're faced with President Trump.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,388 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)If there are, then yes, definitely.
randome
(34,845 posts)Idealism is great but learning from our mistakes is a way to refine that idealism. Some people don't learn.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Where do uncaptured mouse clicks go?[/center][/font][hr]
awake
(3,226 posts)If not then no. It is like if you were asking if you think some one should stop beating their wife with out knowing if there was any beating going on.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)And I oppose legal actions that single out certain individuals purely for political gain.
Response to MadBadger (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
senz
(11,945 posts)Wonder what the purpose is?
These are primarily procedural issues with no intent to harm.
I don't believe in prosecuting them, especially when there was no harm shown to have been done.
You shouldn't be prosecuted every time you speed up to pass a bad driver.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I do not WANT her to be indicted, but if there's evidence to support an indictment then, yes, she should be.
I am not rooting for one, despite my disdain for Ms. Clinton.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)spent a couple of years down in solitary like Chelsea Manning did.
That's how it works for the little folk.
jillan
(39,451 posts)have her indicted before the convention.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I believe "equal under the law" is a core American value, and I do not want "rich and powerful" to be the deciding factor.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)one way or the other before the convention. We don't want any nasty October surprises.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)if not, no.
I'd also like to see this cleared up one way or the other because you better believe the republicans are going to use this for all it's worth.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Response to MadBadger (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
alice mauna
(19 posts)Whether or not I believe crimes were committed, I think our country is absolutely brutal in its meting out of "justice." I believe in cause and effect so nothing is done in a vacuum.
Response to bvf (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bvf
(6,604 posts)Yeah, that'll work.
Response to bvf (Reply #38)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)It may be the only thing left to save the Democratic Party from the hostile corporate takeover that will be complete with her nomination.
Also, letting her slide when it's clear she's guilty as hell will pretty much put an end to any idea of equality under the law, so there are at least these two compelling reasons to want to see her indicted.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)be in quickly, for the good of the Party.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Foundation slush fund
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I would be perfectly happy if I never heard from her or her obnoxious husband for the rest of my damn life.
renate
(13,776 posts)She's going to be the nominee. I support Bernie through and through, but facts are facts.
So, no. I do not want her to be indicted, because I do not want a President Donald OMG OMG OMG Trump. And even now, she does not have much of a margin over him, so I want the FBI to say she is the vision of perfection and a saint in human form.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Fingers crossed!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Don't think she did.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And ensure she does not get any special treatment. Many people without connections have been in serious trouble for mishandling classified information.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)have said that if it had been anyone else they would probably have already lost their clearance, their job and been indicted already if they had done what Clinton did.
And those weren't Fox news entertainers either.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)GOPer or Democrat, if you are a criminal, you need to face charges. I hope I live long enough for some of our WORST criminals to tribunals in The Hague. And yeah, I'm talking about YOU W and Dickie!
jzodda
(2,124 posts)He stands to gain the most so no I don't.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)People's lives were put in danger, not to mention our national security.
You can think it's some kind of conspiracy, but the emails are coming out that document it.