Donald Trump is crashing the system. Journalists need to build a new one. (Washington Post)
Excellent piece. Not that I believe the media will listen. Unfortunately, he does not give too many solutions to this paradox of the Trump candidacy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2016/07/13/donald-trump-is-crashing-the-system-journalists-need-to-build-a-new-one/
...
Everything that happens in election coverage is premised on a kind of opinion: that our votes should be based on reliable information about what the candidates intend to do if elected. Remove that assumption and the edifice crashes. But this is exactly what the candidacy of Donald Trump does. It upends the assumptions required for the traditional forms of campaign journalism even to make sense.
...
Mexico will pay for the wall chips away at one of the foundations of campaign coverage: that running for president is serious business. If you take it seriously, you become the joke. If you dont, then you let him get away with an absurdity. The fact that theres no right answer should tell us something. Trump is crashing the system violating norms and assumptions that were previously taken for granted because so far, everyone who had reached the point of consideration had obeyed them.
...
Under conditions like these, fact-checking may still be worthwhile, but not because it has any shaming effect on the candidate. In fact, it could even be useful to Trump in whipping up resentment against the media, a key part of his appeal. My point is this: When the assumptions underneath a practice collapse, the ethics of that practice may shift as well.
...
Imagine a candidate who wants to increase public confusion about where he stands on things so that voters give up on trying to stay informed and instead vote with raw emotion. Under those conditions, does asking Where do you stand, sir? serve the goals of journalism, or does it enlist the interviewer in the candidates chaotic plan?
...