Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 01:40 PM Jul 2016

Violence, Blood and Betrayal inside the Trump Potemkin Village

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/violence-blood-and-betrayal-inside-the-trump-potemkin-village

In substantive terms, the much bigger story from last night was a hastily thrown together program focused on violence, bloodshed and betrayal by political enemies. We've become so inured to Trump's brand of incitement that it's barely gotten any notice that Trump had three parents whose children had been killed by illegal/undocumented immigrants to tell their stories and whip up outrage and fear about the brown menace to the South. These were either brutal murders or killings with extreme negligence. The pain of these parents is unfathomable.

But whatever you think about undocumented immigrants there's no evidence they are more violent or more prone to murder than others in American society. One could just as easily get three people who's children had been killed by African-Americans or Jews, people whose pain and anguish would be no less harrowing. This isn't illustration; it's incitement. When Trump first did this in California a couple months ago people were aghast. Now it's normal.

Even more disturbing, numerous speakers from the dais, including some of the top speakers of the evening, called for Hillary Clinton to be imprisoned. At least two - and I think more - actually led the crowd in chants of "lock her up!" There has never been any evidence of criminal activity on Clinton's part. An investigation with a lot of pressure to find something amiss concluded that no charges should be recommended against her and that no prosecutor would bring charges against Clinton for anything connected to her private email server.

It goes without saying that it is a highly dangerous development when one presidential nominee and his supporters make into a rallying cry that their opposing candidate should be imprisoned. This is not Russia. This is not some rickety Latin American Republic from half a century ago. This is America. For all our failings and foibles this is not a path we've ever gone down.

This is not a disagreement about a matter of law: it is a demand for vengeance and punishment, one rooted in the pathologies of the current Trumpite right and inevitably to some extent about the fact that Clinton is a woman. If you have a chance rewatch the speeches by Rudy Giuliani or even more ret. Gen Michael Flynn. These are not normal convention speeches. It is only a small skip and a jump to the state legislator in West Virginia who demanded Clinton by executed by hanging on the National Mall. In such a climate, don't fool yourself: worse can happen.

The Trump campaign has always been about revenge and reclamation. Trump is a catalyst not a cause. It is all borne from the social and cultural transformation that is currently changing the country. Hillary Clinton has plenty of flaws. But they have no necessary or clear connection to the venom and increasingly violent anger directed against her. She's simply the symbol and target. "Lock her up!" "Lock her up!". This is an American political convention. She's the opposing party nominee. This is not normal. Not normal at all.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Violence, Blood and Betrayal inside the Trump Potemkin Village (Original Post) geek tragedy Jul 2016 OP
And yet, this moment has been inevitable since at least 1980. villager Jul 2016 #1
As Josh said, Trump is a dangerous man for a dangerous moment. nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #2
Prison Johnny2X2X Jul 2016 #3
and if the person were anyone but Hillary about whom they were saying this dsc Jul 2016 #5
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2016 #4
Their platform is also toxic evidence of their pathology. Hortensis Jul 2016 #6
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. And yet, this moment has been inevitable since at least 1980.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jul 2016

The pundit class (even if not Josh specifically) also have their hands in its authorship.

Johnny2X2X

(19,312 posts)
3. Prison
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jul 2016

You bring up a point I have been making. This is the first time I know of in US history of the entire theme of a convention being that they will throw the leader of the other party in prison if they defeat them in the election. That is right out of 3rd world democracies we see around the world.

And the press should be absolutely outraged that the Reps are openly advocating that prison will be the consequence for Hillary if she loses. That is a huge scandal.

dsc

(52,175 posts)
5. and if the person were anyone but Hillary about whom they were saying this
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 03:57 PM
Jul 2016

they likely would, but their hatred for her is literally unsatiable.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. Their platform is also toxic evidence of their pathology.
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 04:35 PM
Jul 2016

The New York Times Editorial Board believes it would be a mistake not to take serious note of the agenda of what has become of the Republican Party, that it demands attention.

The Most Extreme Republican Platform in Memory

... It is as though, rather than trying to reconcile Mr. Trump’s heretical views with conservative orthodoxy, the writers of the platform simply opted to go with the most extreme version of every position. Tailored to Mr. Trump’s impulsive bluster, this document lays bare just how much the G.O.P. is driven by a regressive, extremist inner core.

Mr. Trump’s anti-Muslim phobia and fantasy wall across the Mexican border are front and center, along with his protectionist views, which deny long-held positions of the party. No less alarming is a raft of planks that ideologues pushed through to banish any notion of moderation and present-day reality from the party’s credo.

This majority has triumphed in securing retrograde positions that include making no exceptions for rape or women’s health in cases of abortion; requiring the Bible to be taught in public high schools; selling coal as a “clean” energy source; demanding a return of federal lands to the states; insisting that legislators use religion as a guide in lawmaking; appointing “family values” judges; barring female soldiers from combat; and rejecting the need for stronger gun controls — despite the mass shootings afflicting the nation every week.

The platform also makes homophobia and the denial of basic civil rights to gays, lesbians and transgender people a centerpiece. It repudiates same-sex marriage, despite strong support for this constitutional right in the nation at large. The party invokes “natural marriage” and states’ rights for determining which bathrooms transgender people may use, and it defends merchants who would deny service to gay customers. ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?ref=opinion
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Violence, Blood and Betra...