How to survive the Hillary hype: Liberal dreams and the media’s big Elizabeth Warren trap
Even as Clinton announces her run, the media is getting it all wrong. There must be a better way to talk about 2016
JOAN WALSH
Hillary Clinton is reportedly set to end the biggest non-mystery in American politics today by announcing her presidential candidacy. But even as we learn that shes running, along with when and how shell make the announcement (via social media and video, were told, on Sunday afternoon), it seems the only actual mystery about the race will remain unsolved: How does Clinton propose to restart the engines of American opportunity that built a broad middle class after World War II, which began to sputter and fail over the last 30 years?
With neither a grand thematic backdrop for an announcement Seneca Falls? Ferguson? McAllen, Tex.? Outside a small-city McDonalds during a fast food workers strike? nor a big address to outline the themes of her campaign, Clinton will leave defining what she stands for to the media for a little while, at least, and thats risky. So far, journalists only seem able to define Clinton in contrast to a past or future opponent, asking
whether shell attack President Obama (its a dumb media given that she has to),
distance herself from her husband, the popular former president, or
push back against the economic populism of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, even without Warren in the race.
If that limbo is risky for Clinton, its even more dangerous for progressives. As we wait to find out how Clinton will respond to the increasingly populist pulse of her partys base, were beset by substitute, over-personalized storylines, heavy on drama but light on issues: Will Clinton co-opt the Warren wing of the party, or will she stand up to it? Is she going to rebuke Wall Street, a la Warren, or offer succor?
Weve even got a surrogate battle of Ivy League economists: Is she closer to
Harvards Raj Chetty, whose studies of upward mobility focus on how to restore it (which is said to be a more optimistic, plutocrat-friendly analysis), or
Columbias Joseph Stiglitz, who recently wrote, in an essay shared with the Clinton team, that an effective economic policy must go beyond incremental policies like raising the minimum wage and improving education, to include redistribution of income a once-routine assumption of public policy that now sounds like communism to a lot of business-oriented Democrats. (For the record, Clinton has met with both men.)
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/how_to_survive_the_hillary_hype_liberal_dreams_and_the_medias_big_elizabeth_warren_trap/