Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 04:21 PM Apr 2015

Hillary Clinton surprises with early attack on CEO pay

(Reuters) - Hillary Clinton, under pressure from the left wing of her Democratic Party to aggressively campaign against income inequality, voiced concern about the hefty paychecks of some corporate executives in an email to supporters.

Striking a populist note, Clinton, who announced on Sunday she was running for president in 2016, said American families were still facing financial hardship at a time "when the average CEO makes about 300 times what the average worker makes."

In a tightly scripted campaign launch in which there were few surprises, the comments were unexpected, at least by progressives, who saw them as an early sign she may shift away from the centrist economic policies pursued by her husband, former President Bill Clinton.

In the social media blitz that kicked off her campaign, Clinton, the prohibitive frontrunner to become the Democratic nominee, expressed concerns about economic inequality.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/13/us-usa-election-clinton-inequality-idUSKBN0N421620150413

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton surprises with early attack on CEO pay (Original Post) bemildred Apr 2015 OP
Truly, we're living in the movie "Zelig" nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #1
Hi Manny. bemildred Apr 2015 #2
Oh God would that be great MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Apr 2015 #3
not a surprise... she has said this many times before OKNancy Apr 2015 #4
What a biased editoralized "news" story Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #6
Well you know they hate it. nt bemildred Apr 2015 #7
Her foundations takes money from, Saudis,Algeria,Pakistan, etc, quadrature Apr 2015 #8
that was quite some adept twisting Evergreen Emerald Apr 2015 #9
Though the irony meter in the article spiked at the end. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #10
I have to agree with this: bemildred Apr 2015 #11

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. Hi Manny.
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 04:30 PM
Apr 2015


I think this could get pretty entertaining, as we go along.

I mean I hope she starts wearing Che t-shirts, but I expect it will be less clear cut.

But I do expect she will rip the Republicans a new one.

Response to bemildred (Original post)

Evergreen Emerald

(13,071 posts)
6. What a biased editoralized "news" story
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:10 PM
Apr 2015

It is couched in negative language with few facts, lots of innuendo and conjecture.

"Pressure from the left wing"
"Striking"
"Tightly scripted"
"few surprises"
"prohibitive"

This is not news this is editorial.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
8. Her foundations takes money from, Saudis,Algeria,Pakistan, etc,
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 06:13 PM
Apr 2015

but she gets to tell others what to do and not do?
WTF?

Evergreen Emerald

(13,071 posts)
9. that was quite some adept twisting
Mon Apr 13, 2015, 07:02 PM
Apr 2015

to correlate her charities to how much the middle class is getting hurt by CEOs taking millions.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. Though the irony meter in the article spiked at the end.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:14 AM
Apr 2015

Those who followed the 2008 "PUMA" movement may remember Lady Rothschild's behavior:

Clinton supporters on Wall Street reacted with equanimity on Monday when asked about her vow to level the playing field for the middle class.

"She will address inequality. The mistake would be to just assume that that’s populist," said Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the CEO of the family investment company E.L. Rothschild and a Clinton supporter.

"If rich people are not worried about today's levels of income inequality, then they are stupid," she said.



bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. I have to agree with this:
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:36 AM
Apr 2015

"If rich people are not worried about today's levels of income inequality, then they are stupid,"

That is pretty much why I do think they are stupid. Smart elites govern well. Things work. Change happens smoothly and sensibly. Progress is not measured by profit alone. Everything is not politicized and treated as a source of patronage. Ours do not. And our government seems to be too disfunctional to do anything about it, hamstrung by the national obscurity state and transformed by the corruption of elections into a disunited oligarchy, all fending for themselves. It is not a pretty picture.

But I get your point, Clinton is most unlikely to lead the revolution, and that is why those rich people who are not stupid are comfortable with her.

I am curious to see what she will do, how this plays out, and having sat through Nixon, Raygun, and Bush the Elder and Bush the Lesser, Clinton will do if she must.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton surprises...