2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton surprises with early attack on CEO pay
(Reuters) - Hillary Clinton, under pressure from the left wing of her Democratic Party to aggressively campaign against income inequality, voiced concern about the hefty paychecks of some corporate executives in an email to supporters.
Striking a populist note, Clinton, who announced on Sunday she was running for president in 2016, said American families were still facing financial hardship at a time "when the average CEO makes about 300 times what the average worker makes."
In a tightly scripted campaign launch in which there were few surprises, the comments were unexpected, at least by progressives, who saw them as an early sign she may shift away from the centrist economic policies pursued by her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
In the social media blitz that kicked off her campaign, Clinton, the prohibitive frontrunner to become the Democratic nominee, expressed concerns about economic inequality.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/13/us-usa-election-clinton-inequality-idUSKBN0N421620150413
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)I think this could get pretty entertaining, as we go along.
I mean I hope she starts wearing Che t-shirts, but I expect it will be less clear cut.
But I do expect she will rip the Republicans a new one.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Che-lovin' Hillary!
Response to bemildred (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,071 posts)It is couched in negative language with few facts, lots of innuendo and conjecture.
"Pressure from the left wing"
"Striking"
"Tightly scripted"
"few surprises"
"prohibitive"
This is not news this is editorial.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)but she gets to tell others what to do and not do?
WTF?
Evergreen Emerald
(13,071 posts)to correlate her charities to how much the middle class is getting hurt by CEOs taking millions.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Those who followed the 2008 "PUMA" movement may remember Lady Rothschild's behavior:
"She will address inequality. The mistake would be to just assume that thats populist," said Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the CEO of the family investment company E.L. Rothschild and a Clinton supporter.
"If rich people are not worried about today's levels of income inequality, then they are stupid," she said.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)"If rich people are not worried about today's levels of income inequality, then they are stupid,"
That is pretty much why I do think they are stupid. Smart elites govern well. Things work. Change happens smoothly and sensibly. Progress is not measured by profit alone. Everything is not politicized and treated as a source of patronage. Ours do not. And our government seems to be too disfunctional to do anything about it, hamstrung by the national obscurity state and transformed by the corruption of elections into a disunited oligarchy, all fending for themselves. It is not a pretty picture.
But I get your point, Clinton is most unlikely to lead the revolution, and that is why those rich people who are not stupid are comfortable with her.
I am curious to see what she will do, how this plays out, and having sat through Nixon, Raygun, and Bush the Elder and Bush the Lesser, Clinton will do if she must.