2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPotential Roadblock For Bernie Sanders Rises In New Hampshire
By Jeff Zeleny and Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 12:00 PM ET, Thu April 30, 2015
Washington (CNN)Sen. Bernie Sanders is a political independent, who proudly calls himself a socialist. As he declared his presidential candidacy Thursday, he pledged to run on the Democratic ticket.
He could hit an early roadblock in New Hampshire -- not with Hillary Clinton, but William Gardner, who has guarded the state's first-in-the-nation presidential primary for four decades as Secretary of State. He said he isn't sure whether Sanders meets the state's requirement to be on the presidential ballot.
"If they're going to run in the primary, they have to be a registered member of the party," Gardner told CNN. "Our declaration of candidacy form that they have to fill out says 'I am a registered member of the party.'"
--clip
Even if Sanders wanted to formally declare his allegiance to the Democratic Party, which he has not done during a quarter-century in Congress, he would technically be hamstrung. Vermont, his home state, is one of more than 20 across the country that does not register voters by party.
--clip
But when reminded that Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor who sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004, qualified for the New Hampshire ballot, even though he was also not a registered Democrat, Gardner paused for several moments. He said he would dig out Dean's paperwork from storage and check.
more...
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/30/politics/bernie-sanders-new-hampshire-democrats/
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)So only people from less than 30 states get to run in the New Hampshire primary?!
brooklynite
(94,796 posts)IF there's a primary election in a specific state, the state laws or court rulings apply. If there's a caucus or no popular selection at all, that's entirely up to the party.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)that is sure to gain some faithful followers of 'H', indeed.
brooklynite
(94,796 posts)Like they knocked Obama off the ballot in 2008?
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)See, e.g., Smith v Allwright (1944)
bunnies
(15,859 posts)We're a stubborn bunch.
Gothmog
(145,687 posts)In Texas, you do not register as a member of a party but once you vote in one party's primary, then you can not vote in the other party's primary for the remainder of that election cycle. Neither Papa Bush, W nor Carnival Cruz' voter registration will show them as being registered as a republican. I guess that Papa Bush and W cheated when they ran in the NH primary
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)If they did keep Sanders off the ballot they would disenfranchise people from voting for him as a candidate. Although voters could write in Sanders, those ballots would be subject to more scrutiny than a ballot with his name on it including the possibility of being challenged.
NHDEMFORLIFE
(489 posts)Bill Gardner has been Secretary of State for nearly 40 years. In NH the Secretary of State is elected by the legislature which, until the last 10 years or so, was in the iron grip of the Republican Party.
Before that, he was a state rep - one of the handful of state reps making up the Democratic caucus back then. It was a mountainous challenge to fill out town and city ballots with Democratic candidates for state rep. Gardner was in charge of recruiting Democratic candidates and recruited me to run for state rep in 1976.
As an aside, I got whipped in that race. I think Jimmy Carter got about 37 percent, which was about the norm for a Democrat in NH then.
My overly delayed point is that he is completely fair and plays everything straight down the middle when it comes to his official duties. It isn't in his makeup to stick it to anyone.
State laws aside, my view is that it is not to much to ask that someone running for a party's nomination be a member of the party.
BTW, I don't know who I'll end up supporting in the primary, but Bernie Sanders is closer to my political philosophy than anyone I have voted for in 10 presidential primaries.
cali
(114,904 posts)Obviously, one does not have to be registered with either party to run in NH. Howard Dean, the Bushes, and on and on. What part of VERMONT HAS NO REGISTRATION BY PARTY is so difficult to understand. 20 other states don't either. The DNC has welcomed him to the race, so who the fuck is Gardener to try and exclude him on a patently bullshit premise? He said you have to be a REGISTERED Democrat or Republican to run in NH. In that case, your revered SoS has been doing a piss poor job over the last 40 years of keeping candidates who are not registered, off the ballot.
NHDEMFORLIFE
(489 posts)I don't remember saying anything about revering him, but if that is how it sounded, I made some poor word choices, I guess.
By the way, YOU DON'T NEED TO YELL! I CAN HEAR YOU!
This is going to be a fun primary if there is going to be this sort of dialogue.
Response to cali (Reply #13)
NHDEMFORLIFE This message was self-deleted by its author.
former9thward
(32,097 posts)There is no party registration in Illinois.