individuals. Looking at the top 20 of Hillary, those are individual folks who happen to work for those firms. Very little is from the PACs of those firms.

On Bernie's side, you see the opposite. Almost all of that money in his top 20 list is from PACs.

And of course the corporate donors are listed as individuals. That's how corporate donations show up.

Very little is from the PACs of those firms.

Corporate PACs are limited in how much they can donate.

Compiling them this way and saying "X firm supports Z candidate!!!!11!11!!!" is what is dishonest. When that organization or firm's PAC supports someone, then that organization or firm is supporting them.

It's how Democrats had refered to it when Republicans are the recipients for quite some time.

You're not new to the party, are you?

Isn't that the GOP mantra? Corporations are people too.

I prefer labor union PACs to right wing wacko PACs (or Hillary Clinton's Wall Street buddies).

Actually, as we see, one can raise more money for a candidate as a bundler of the individual contributions of coworkers than PACs themselves can contribute. See, http://pac.org/news/pac/fec-raises-contribution-limits-2015-2016 Super-PACs that raise money for issues groups are essentially unlimited as is giving to Foundations and other nonprofit 501c4 institutions.

Bundlers (ad hoc groups of corporate executives) often contribute more money than the official corporate PAC in the same company.

Bernie's supporters influence real people...members, etc. If they can tap that market and get them to the polls, he stands a chance. Maybe it means a half day paid work to go and vote. Maybe it means showing this type of detail to the workers.

GOTV...sounds repetitive, but somehow he has to visit and connect with the leaders and those potential voters. Many have lost hope and don't vote. It's the formerly non-voter, turned voter or Independent that could possibly wreak havoc with the Conventional Wisdom and the Status Quo. Bernie may be just the guy to do this.

They've been beaten up too much by the current administration. They're smart to support Bernie.

We don't get any support otherwise. We have to jump through hoops and evaluated to death.

You can't beat that. He couldn't fix everything over night, but he certainly wouldn't appoint an Arne Duncan, ugh.

We have no idea who any of the unions will support at this point as it's too early. My guess is there will be a lot of pressure on them to support Hillary Clinton.

And I don't think they're naive anymore. They got burned by Obama big time. Why wouldn't they support someone with a long history of being a pro-labor champion?

There will be those who will attack anyone who opposes Queen Hillary's coronation. Sad. Really sad. Even ---> bummer dude.

Bernie is the only candidate not owned by corporate America.

I think Bernie can ignite and lead a revolution of the lower 99% against that upper 1%

The 1% gets what they pay for. Who/what is the 99% willing to pay for?