a heartbeat away from the presidency.

Way to look strong, Senator.

He might even get re-elected if he looks strong. Just like we can't let his jobs bill through. It might work and make him look good, instead of just being good. He can be good as long as nobody knows it.

On one side, the Republicans are crying because Obama is kicking ass. On the other side, the Democrats are crying because Obama is kicking too much ass.

He's already PROVED that he is. He took out OBL and Gadaffi. Member? You member.

What an insult to the Libyan people. The UK and France dragged the U.S. into that one.

Minutes after unconfirmed reports of Qaddafi's death broke, pundits started arguing over whether or not Obama deserves credit. If indeed the Libyan dictator is done for--and it certainly looks like is--he would be yet another on a growing list of major terrorist targets brought down this year under the president's watch. However, Qaddafi wasn't the sort of direct hit that Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki and Atiyah Abd al-Rahman (Al Qaeda's former number two) were, so the debate over Obama's role in the former dictator's death is necessarily convoluted. But the entire Libyan conflict has been that way from the start. When he sent troops to help the rebels less than six months ago, the president caused an uproar on all sides, catching flak from some for not being more aggressive and others for entangling the United States needlessly in another war. As The Atlantic Wire's Elspeth Reeve wrote at the time, conservatives and liberals simply "agreed to disagree with Obama." Now that Qaddafi is reportedly gone for good, folks seem eager to take sides, and this time, the split is more predictable

Those Giving Obama Credit

Nick Kristoff at The New York Times tweeted soon after the news broke, "If Qaddafi is dead, this is (tentative) vindication of a brave Obama decision to back rebels trying to overthrow him." On MSNBC later on Thursday morning, Kristoff said, "It was an unusual decision by President Obama to engage in libya and it was very controversial … At least for now, tentatively, this strikes me as somehwat of a vindication for that decision."

John McCain conspicuously avoided mentioning the president in his remarks, as The Chicago Tribute pointed out on his Thursday morning. However, the former presidential candidate told Fox News, "This is a victory for the president, the Obama administration but most importantly [for the Libyan people]." (Note: Before his remarks to Fox News, we'd put McCain in the not-giving-credit camp. We've since updated the post and bumped him up into the giving-credit camp.)

Those Not Giving Obama Credit

Mitt Romney tweeted "Muammar al-Qaddafi was a tyrant who terrorized the Libyan people and shed American blood and the world is a better place without him."

Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post anticipates the credit question and argues how it won't even matter. "The reported death of deposed Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi will be touted by Democrats as another foreign policy success story for President Obama but seems unlikely to seriously affect his political fortunes heading into a 2012 campaign still laser-focused on the struggling U.S. economy," he writes.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/10/does-obama-deserve-credit-killing-qaddafi/43918/
entire article can be read here:

Somewhere near the gates of Hell.

He even said so.

He says it up thread.

You never know!

Just joking. He needs to go and crawl under a rock. I don't care about his opinion either. The same old clown who picked Sara as VP.

Valerie. Plame.

"Sen. McCain especially had strong words for the president, saying, "it makes president Obama look strong!" "