2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOh boy - "Claire McCaskill Will Not Attend Democratic National Convention"
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/06/claire-mccaskill-not-going-to-dem-convention.php?ref=fpa"Claire McCaskill will not be attending the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, a McCaskill aide confirmed to TPM Tuesday. McCaskill joins a list of vulnerable Democratic politicians whose home districts are hostile ground for President Obama and who will be steering clear of the convention.
In years when Claire is on the ballot, she has historically not gone to the convention, the aide said, because she believes its important to stay in Missouri to talk to voters.
snip -
I guess I can see the point....but....come on!
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)![](/emoticons/eyes.gif)
![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
DJ13
(23,671 posts)![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-M_r8c34jjp0/TXL5sgY2ePI/AAAAAAAAAd8/QiqeynjnThw/Blue-Chicken-Front.jpg)
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I get emails (for some unknown reason, perhaps because I'm a woman registered Democrat) from her campaign/office at least once a week. I never read them, but this time I'm going to open the email and press the "unsubscribe" button. Hopefully there'll be a space in which I can write my reasons for kicking her off my email list.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)let's hope most of the democrats stay home-- saves millions of dollars.
same applies to the repug convention.
EC
(12,287 posts)skipping their parties big bash because the voters in their districts don't like their party. Does this really work? Do the indies in Missouri really care one way or another if she goes or not? The same with the 3 from West Virginia...I think they all are just wrong about this, I don't think anyone cares if you went to your parties convention or not. Isn't it kinda expected?
onenote
(42,882 posts)In 2008, several Repubs who were up for reelection that year announced that they were skipping the repub convention, including Pat Roberts, Libby Dole, Ted Stevens, Gordon Smith, Susan Collins, and John Sunnunu. Roger Wicker originally hinted that he wasn't going, then that he was, and then used Hurricane Gustav as an excuse not to go. Ultimately, Dole,Sununu, Stevens, and Smith lost their elections, while Collins, Wicker and Roberts won.
This year, at least one repub, Denny Rehberg, who is runing against Tester in Montana, has announced he's skipping this year's repub convention.
jenmito
(37,326 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)You're right....
onenote
(42,882 posts)as you are now paying to what Democrats are doing in 2012. Which makes perfect sense, actually.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)She HATES being called 'Libby'.
pstokely
(10,541 posts)?
pstokely
(10,541 posts)She probably thinks this will prevent her from being seen as an Obama rubber stamp.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)She may as well just spend the time on her ground game. She'll need every vote if she's vulnerable, so why not go do what she needs to do. She could always fly in on the last night, shake hands around the delegation, and race home if she'd like.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)The media, however, will use this negatively against the president.
pstokely
(10,541 posts)polls haven't shown Mittens to be ahead by much, one poll even showed Obama ahead by a point
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,464 posts)stupid not to go in the first place but even more stupid for unnecessarily IMHO publicizing it.
jenmito
(37,326 posts)onenote
(42,882 posts)who, of course, wasn't a candidate for anything.
However, four years later, when Bush was off the ballot and McCain was running to replace him, a number of well-known repubs skipped the repub convention. Undobutedly, their desire to appeal to indpendent voters played a role in their decision as did the opportunity to continue to campaign at home rather than lose a week on the road. McCaskill, as the article notes, skipped the 2004 convention, again for the stated reason that she had her own campaign to attend to.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)They offer no real purpose than to showcase the nominee in the best possible light and stroke the egos of the base. Mittens has said he will name his VP nominee prior to the rushpublican swillfest in Tampa so even that element of "surprise" will be gone. Being an incumbent, there's also little suspense over this year's DNC. Other than having her mug on stage of 15 minutes (probably only seen on C-SPAN) there's not much else for Sen. McCaskill or any other candidate to be there. In an election year where SuperPacs are throwing millions into Senate races, Sen. McCaskill needs to spend as much time as she can working the state...
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Democratic leaders or that you'll NEVER see a Republican diss the Republican Party by skipping its convention.
Republicans fear their base. Democrats LOATHE their base!!
onenote
(42,882 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 27, 2012, 01:39 PM - Edit history (1)
Some pretty big names stayed away: Libby Dole, Gordon Smith, Pat Roberts, Roger Wicker, Susan Collins, Ted Stevens, John Sununu.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Your rudeness was unnecessary
onenote
(42,882 posts)I just overreacted to your post and its "shouting" (capitalizing) the assertion that Democrats "loathe" their base. I feel like I am a part of the base and I don't feel "loathed."
But that doesn't excuse my snark. I've edited it out.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)I feel like the Republicans go out of their way to appeal to their base while the Democrats often take their base for granted. "Loathe" was too harsh a word, probably.
However, I still support the party, especially the ones who do all they can to stand up to the special interests. Their voice has been silenced.
Ultimately I believe we're on the same team and I will work hard to get more Democrats elected to office, especially at the local and state level. The party is really struggling there.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Blue dogs just muddy the waters and encourage people to stay home on election day.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)I'll vote for her still, but god damn!
LiberalFighter
(51,400 posts)Probably some numbnut that doesn't have a clue about political campaigns.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Not surprised.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Claire has been getting absolutely hammered with daily ads (Obamacare and job killing policies) from crossroads for over two years now. I think this is not such a bad idea for her. There may be some Missouri independents, but the right wingers are gonna slam her from now until November. We need to keep her, as we are already stuck with Barf Blunt.
For some reason, the big R's in Washington and elsewhere HATE her.
pstokely
(10,541 posts)Obama isn't real popular there (outside of KC and STL) but Mittens doesn't appear to popular there either. Maybe she can connect them to Mittens by disconnecting herself from Obama.
TeamPooka
(24,308 posts)why are you together?
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)Claire is a progressive but she recognizes she is from a swing to red state....
For her, she needs to balance the political equation. Does she attend a convention that might be vitriolic against RMoney when her state could be tracking solidly for him?
She needs to do what she believes is strategically appropriate for her re-election bid. I will not, nor will I allow other progressives, to chastise her for a calculated decision.
I would love to see her at the convention. But if her absence improves our chance for an additional seat in the Senate, I go for the Senate seat.
pstokely
(10,541 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:29 PM - Edit history (1)
But why does she even need to attend the convention?
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)I believe she was one of the first Senators to come out
(I could be wrong)
and endorse the President over Hillary ....
pstokely
(10,541 posts)Same people outside of WI who bitched about Obama not coming to WI during the recall
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This will backfire on her.
pstokely
(10,541 posts)?