Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumNo matter how Bernie adjusts his message, it won't be enough. Not ever.
Because in actuality much of this outrage over his messaging is not about Bernie at all. It may have been about Bernie at first at Netroots Nation, but now it has turned into something else.
No other candidate is being scrutinized so closely, no other candidate's every utterance on racial issues is being analyzed word by word. I literally mean word by word.
Not ready to leave DU just yet, so I will not give my interpretation of what it is going on....but it is about far more than Bernie.
He could give a whole speech on how black lives matter, it would not be enough.
To his credit after the Netroots Nation event, he humbled himself as they wished.
He immediately went to work to adjust his message, even though his decades of work already spoke for him.
It doesn't matter what Bernie says, because it's not about Bernie.
He did a brilliant job today against Chuck Todd's idiotic verbal assault loaded with talking points. Yet I have seen posts already analyzing how he could have done it better.
That's how it will be from now on. Because it's not about Bernie. AND it's not about his supporters...so tired of hearing that.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)In another thread about adjusting his message!
-------
"Toad and other Bernie bashers (GDP)...
will never be satisfied.
Bernie can change his narrative, drilling down to microscopic pinpoints...and it's never going to be good enough for those that are only concerned with their agenda. The is no compromising with them to make them happy...ever. You will never hear Toad say, OK I get it...end of conversation.
Where was HRC today on the shows? Oh ya...no where to be found, as she's roped off from any media.
Bernie and Team Bernie are doing just fine right now."
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Just kidding.
Just got a pm telling me how awful Bernie supporters are. I did not respond, just blocked them from PMing me.
It's really getting bad.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)for all the "awful Bernie supporters" on DU, and I haven't found a single one. Not a single one.
Guess I'll keep looking...
(P. S. AND, I'll keep supporting Bernie!)
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)To some of the folks here on DU, we have to be "crazy" to support Bernie. Anyone who supports Bernie and brings up issues about a different candidate is attacking that candidate. Sheesh!
They tell us that Bernie is not a real Democrat, because he did not raise money for the party.
Apparently there are many people who are satisfied with the status quo, and the corporate takeover of the US, and will do nothing about it. They even support candidates who side with the corporate interests.
I guess that I am crazy for thinking that unless something is done about the money in politics, and support a politician who is also against this legal bribery, than so be it!
I still believe that Bernie SHALL win!
Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #45)
a2liberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
TrumanTown
(15 posts)DNC-DCCC and DSCC They Can Go To HELL!! You're Nothing But A Corrupt Corporate Shills!! I Give To The Blue America PAC - Run By Digby - John Amato and Howie Klein! Not A Penny Goes To Them! They Find Real Progressives To Run Not Corporate Shills!
senz
(11,945 posts)And it's just going to get worse. He's a treasure, let's protect him.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)I deleted because I accidentally left my real name in there. Reposting here
Subject: "he did not raise money for the party"
Is that seriously a meme making the rounds? I hadn't heard that one and we need to shut it down because it's just plain false. Bernie has many times signed fundraising e-mails for the DSCC. Here's some text from the last one I found in a quick e-mail search (I'm almost there's more recent ones too, just can't find them at the moment)
Dear ____,
7 days to go. Our work is paying off. 10 states are now within 3%. All gifts matched. Left to go: $610,593 Deadline: midnight Thursday. Contribute.
Just seven days until Election Day.
Yes. I know. As a proud Independent I am more than aware that a whole lot of folks are angry and disappointed that the Democrats have not been bolder in developing policy, and more aggressive in taking on Republican obstructionism. Trust me. I share that frustration.
But now is not the time to shoot ourselves in the foot and debate what the Democrats did or didnt do (thats for the day after the election). Now is the time to do everything we can to keep right-wing extremists out of the U.S. Senate, and I need your help right now.
Its time to fight! Click here to rush $5 or more to the DSCC so they can raise $610,593 by midnight Thursday. Give right now, and your contribution will be matched doubling your impact!
As you may have noticed, as a result of the excellent work being done by the DSCC, the election map is beginning to change. The DSCC has run ads in 10 states, and now Democrats are leading in 9 of those races. That progress is all because of you.
But we cant rest now, not when theres just one week left and things could change overnight. California, Connecticut, Nevada, Washington, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Colorado, West Virginia every one of these races is winnable, IF Democrats have the money to fight relentlessly until November 2.
Click here to rush $5 or more to the DSCC before midnight Thursday so they can reach their goal of raising $610,593. Give right now, and your contribution will be matched dollar for dollar.
Our country needs to move forward, not backwards. If these Tea Partiers make it to the Senate, my colleagues and I will be spending all of our time holding the line against their outlandish ideas from abolishing the minimum wage to cutting Medicare to privatizing Social Security. Theres too much real work to be done for struggling Americans, who are counting on the very programs these people want to scrap.
But we can stop them. All it takes is a contribution from you. The DSCC will take your donation and rush it to the races that need it most. Theyll make their final media buys, set up their get out the vote strategies, and plant more signs and hand out more fliers. These are the things that win races, and these are the things that must happen but theyll only happen with your help.
Your contributions are working. Now Democrats just need more to increase their advantage and pull ahead where the races are still neck and neck. But theres simply not a moment to lose. You have to act right now.
Click here to make your immediate donation of $5 or more to the DSCC and help them raise $610,593 by midnight Thursday. Your gift will be matched dollar for dollar and then rushed to campaign managers throughout the country so they can make their final media buys and fund their GOTV efforts.
This is a pivotal moment in American history. Together, lets stop right-wing extremism. Give today, and thats exactly what well do.
Sincerely,
Sen. Bernie Sanders
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)of obnoxious Hillary supporters who post the same 3 or 4 memes over and over for how many months now? They have nothing to add to the conversation. Nothing. I love the Ignore feature.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)In the 2008 election cycle, I had a lot of blocked "Hillary Supporters" (most of them had Hill in their screen name). Seems to be a lot of negativity this time around, too.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I think they want Clinton over Bush.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Those with bets on all the rides except Sanders are getting nervous. It's beautiful to watch the jockeying, kicking and back-biting for position before they're even IN the starting gates.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I've been saying this for awhile now.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)"Oh Hillary is on top of that", even though she didn't start talking about many of the major issues in her speeches today until Bernie was gaining in popularity...then she started copying his message and coming out with similar stances on things, and suddenly it's Hillary Hillary Hillary, even though she never mentioned any of that before. She's for it, but nothing Bernie says is enough to convince them that he's for it, even though he's always been fighting the good fight on all these topics.
It's enough to make you laugh or cry.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)The Bern must be stopped at all costs or there will be trouble in Oligarchy land.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Always about the money.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)In addition to the money, I suspect it's more about 'keeping the little people in line'.
"Please sir, may I have some more?" has worked for the 1% for so long, they've gotten used to throwing us crumbs and bones.
If Sanders gets the nom and/ or wins, their entire world view will be turned upside down - mighty scary concept for America's TRUE minority (the billionaires).
zeemike
(18,998 posts)But once it infects you I am afraid it is hopeless. And they can never have enough money and power to satisfy the craving.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)If he chases the issue there will always be one more thing he needs to do in order to meet new demands. I thought he did fine with the interview today but it was the first time I've seen him off message.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)?
pa28
(6,145 posts)Seemed to me it came at the expense hammering home his core message. The latest polls show about half don't even know who he is yet so he's still got some work to do introducing himself to the public.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Thanks.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Bernie is fantastic, however, and I feel his sincerity will have him rising above it.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I for one will be out trying to introduce him to as many undecided voters as I can. Many Hillary supporters outside of DU support her only because they are unfamiliar with either Bernie or O'Malley. We have a lot of work to do and as far as the Hillary supporters on DU, they just don't count as a deciding demographic.
TBF
(32,142 posts)and that is the one thing that threatens the status quo. That's what this is about & the billionaires will do whatever they can to shut him down.
This campaign is going to be run by his supporters - we will get no help from media or anyone in any position of power.
He needs to just move on & do his thing. We will continue to distribute that far and wide via social media and in person.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Now is the time for a real progressive populist movement, but the message needs to be clear and not overly complex and it needs to be repeated over and over to drive it home into the minds of the people.
Then Bernie will win
Divernan
(15,480 posts)and the HRC camp knows it, so one of their memes is to carp, "Oh, he always gives the same speech." Damn straight, Skippy. And an excellent and inspiring speech it is! And he never shrinks from the opportunity to deliver it. He was quite effective on Meet the Press today. And as the panel discussion highlighted, HRC's refusal to engage the press is seen as arrogance. Maybe it's that, or perhaps it's that she and her hundreds of handlers know she cannot handle unscripted appearances and she lacks the courage to try.
I could point out to them that their biggest problem is a candidate who is vague at best, and reluctant to come down on one side or the other of most issues.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's called their stump speech, and anyone who pays attention to politics knows that. Especially the HRC minions.
TBF
(32,142 posts)another filled stadium! Most people I know from there hate Jindal so much that they'll take anyone else. I bet Bernie is easily winning them over!
Nuff said.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)They edited out a part of that interview that directly contradicted the op. It was shameless, dishonest and should be disallowed.
I expect better of DUer's
This post was edited to add "in GDP" to the reply title.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)It makes for a much better DU experience.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)I just got too tired of getting upset with the troll bait. But that was a good response.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)It's the pot they are used to damn it, and they aren't going to change pots now no matter how much sense it makes.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Better to ignore those with an agenda and move forward. I think that is what Sanders is trying to do. Lay out your principles and the hell with those who say they "aren't enough"
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)And it can get rough - but before getting too upset think about where we are.
The internet. Try not to get virtual tunnel vision. Chill and relax. Don't despair. The important part is the OP. And the # of reccs.
DU is one of my homepages. And every single day I notice that there are at least 4 or 5 POSITIVE fact based Bernie OP's on the Greatest Threads or Trending Now sections. Hillary OP's not so much - maybe 1 or 2 over the coarse of a day. And I stay away from the negative ones without any real facts about any Democratic candidate.
IMHO the comments are largely interesting to policy wonks and hard core bloggers - not so much Jose and Janet Sixpack, who probably have never heard of DU. As a long time lurker - 11 years and counting - who only posts occasionally but lurks almost every single day, I in general stay out of the deep end of the comment section but when I do stick my toes in I can usually identify those commenters who have an ax to grind or are there to disrupt, with ease, as I imagine most here can. And I give their posts due consideration (or in extreme cases the ignore button for those with obnoxious ADHD who are there only to derail topics).
Mostly I post occasionally to support those posters I agree with to reinforce support for them, but usually I sit back, ingest facts and enjoy the popcorn.
Cheers! Fight the good fight assertively yet respectfully - whatever you believe it is - remember all liberals and progressives need to be on the same side in the end (despite what the oligarchs think) and post accordingly, and Have a wonderful day!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)But I will say this. I believe there was a true desire by many to hear him talk more directly about civil rights and social justice issues, and I as a supporter I am loving hearing him address them more directly. And I think overall this will end up being a positive for him. There are unpersuadables, but there are also people who he can reach out to by talking more about this. As a supporter, I'm happy to see it.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I agree.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)His problem was never getting the opportunity to.
bvf
(6,604 posts)like Todd frame the debate.
That's another thing to like, IMO.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)some prefer not to hear it. and i agree with him: economic and social justice are parallel, and you cannot have one without the other.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)economic factors (read the rich peoples greed) and the need for their political hacks to divide the people institutionalized the racial hatred. While they may appear to be separate parallel, the cause of both is the same economic greed and we must speak their names, ( Big Banks, Big Corporations, Billionaires and millionaires) and work to subvert their manipulation of our government through their purchases of our candidates. Racism was bred to feed upon a powerful need of the egos of poor whites and thereby deflecting their anger from the rich classes that abused them before and after the civil war. This need to feel better about yourself when you at the bottom of the barrel, drives the hatred spewed by republicans even as we democrats continue to support puppets of the rich. If you want to attack racism, you have to address its economic causes and that is the desire of the rich for more and more domination over our government in order to further increase economic inequities.
Democrats are fond of saying that a rising tide raises all boats, the rich only measure their success in terms of how high their boat is in terms of everyone else's. They understand that increases in comparative wealth rather than just increased wealth is needed to satisfy greed for wealth and they covet the power that wealth is to provide them. As a result they are constantly striving to get more and more wealth and political power. Bernie Sanders would work to remove both from them-comparative wealth and political power. Is it any wonder they fund Hillary and try to deflect our attention with main stream attacks on right wing clowns. The rich just want to own a government- what ever party it calls itself. To deny this is ignorance of our history and a lack of understanding of human nature. Go Bernie!
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)especially considering so many black people are still living in poverty, and over 50% of black youth are unemployed. there are no industries or services in many black communities, except the "poverty industries," like check cashing outfits that are guilty of usury, and i am sure pay low wages. it is all entwined, and cannot be separated. and many of these companies are owned by big corporations, like banks, that have abandoned those communities. i support Bernie Sanders!
icarusxat
(403 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)You've been fighting the good fight, but you are up against regular weak assed human beings ...
There is NOTHING you can do that will convince 100% of any population to agree to an idea ...
Know that you are doing your best and accept that some will refuse your message ... Don't beat yourself up over that ... You do far more good than you realize ...
You have our utter respect ...
July 29 is next ... Love YOU, mad ...
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,835 posts). . .that too many media and people have.
You can only say sorry so many times in so many different ways.
Fuck this shit. Let's move on and forward.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,036 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Been having a hard time getting good ones around here.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,036 posts)and bogarting my maters!
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Love good tomatoes.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)OK, so they're not the fancy schmancy ones like you grow/breed/write about. But I like my little Sweet 100's and my Romas nonetheless
Seriously, I'm dieting and the diet said I can have as much veggies as I want so when I get the munchies I just go out to the garden and chow down on some cherry tomatoes.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)The billionaires can't have the people united on common ground. Otherwise the billionaires might lose control.
mountain grammy
(26,668 posts)Bring it on.. not a flip flop ever.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)Madfloridian, don't even THINK about leaving DU! We'll come find you and drag you back here...kickin' & screamin', if need be!!!
chervilant
(8,267 posts)I will help with that, if need be.
(Really, don't you dare go, Mad! Your advocacy and activism is essential!!!)
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)I'd be at a lost. Always click on MadFlo posts and learn a lot.
Response to loudsue (Reply #35)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)It's hard to tell here who is of the "privileged class", don't you think?
Response to madfloridian (Reply #52)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I no longer post in GDP. So I could swear...why yes, I am.
Response to madfloridian (Reply #61)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)We are not anyone's enemy. Never have been.
Response to madfloridian (Reply #71)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)I take full responsibility for my own statements.
They represent only my opinions, and no one else's.
Here's one right now ...
I think corporatists SUCK, no matter which party they are affiliated with.
Oligarchy sucks.
Plutarchy sucks.
Neocons suck.
Militarists and war-profiteers suck.
These things will suck as long as there is a universe with living things somewhere in it.
And the supporters of such policies are also misguided and morally compromised (unless they are rich,
or directly profit from the MIC, in which case they are simply serving their own selfish interests).
This is unequivocal and empirical.
I still think many "Democrats" who support Hillary and corporatism can be retrieved----Saved from themselves.
Perhaps 4 years of Prez Hillary pushing more corporatist/Pro-wall st/war-mongering policies on a beleagered America will help persuade them?
It is our job as Bernie-supporters to prevent that from happening, if we can.
And if we fail, all will suffer.
Response to madfloridian (Reply #71)
MerryBlooms This message was self-deleted by its author.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)This group is a safe haven and your attacks on a member are not welcome.
MerryBlooms
(11,776 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)so if she's willing I'm going to make her a host, she can block them.
MerryBlooms
(11,776 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Apropos of nothing I'd just like to state that part of the reason I like supporting Sanders is that his campaign gets it. It doesn't ignore the fundamental unfairness and corruption of the system, and how that amplifies all the pain and suffering of those not in the upper tiers.
Sanders supporters identify with these people. We're not about just tossing a kiss and a promise their way. God help us all if people don't wise up to the fundamental changes needed to our system. We're very close to becoming substantially shut out of it. Our courts and legislatures have decreed that money is speech, and that those with the gold get to make the rules.
People need for the scales to fall from their eyes, and to see what's at stake in this election cycle.
I think people know, in their heart of hearts, that Sanders is our best, and maybe last, hope to keep the curtain from coming down on our American Experiment, and seeing control slip from our hands, into the tightfisted ones of a wealth based aristocracy. He's not going to be the answer to all our problems, but way too much negativity is getting projected onto him.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Say what you will about it but the bottom line is that even many our own have sold out to big money ...to win. This is the last stand for the people. Vote for Bernie or our democracy will die.
I agree that if Bernie does not win the primary there will be no point in giving a shit about the Dem party. I myself will re-register as an Ind and I won't be on DU any more which should make the pro oligarchy to win gang very happy. Enjoy it ...cause you're never going to be part of the oligarchy and they will never really give a shit about you.
Nay
(12,051 posts)little for me to do other than stop paying much attention to politics. I've tried for 20 years to get people to see what's happening to them and their country and I've had very little success. I don't even LIKE politics but felt it was my duty as a citizen to keep up on things and try to help progressives do better. I'm at the point where I think things are going to have to get a whole lot worse before anyone wakes up, and since I don't have much time left and would rather play with my grandchild, I'm going to be spending a lot less time on something I can't change. I can't convince stupid people of anything and I'm going to stop trying.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)playing with my cats and birds.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)finally figuring out - you do what you can and let go. (which nobody has to be old to do anyway. )
zeemike
(18,998 posts)We will have a Republican president and DU will return to being undergrond...and some will blame Bernie supporters for it.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)in fact the lefties are the biggest nose-holders out there--and get blamed every time said nose-holding isn't enough; and once there's a response after the 40th stimulus the rhetoric only redoubles
of course anyone to the left of Franco is both so minority they don't need to be listened to AND such a mighty campaign force that every loss is ALL! THEIR! FAULT!
OTOH sometimes they acknowledge discontented voters--as a sign that the party's moved too far left
zeemike
(18,998 posts)The GOP has them too...and they are the cause of the Trump factor. They are so tired of it they are willing to press the destruct button.
And it is not just about racism...for many of them their life has gotten worse no matter what party wins.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)we just have to get them to the primaries!
the Dem Establishment tries to keep the old "votes for nothing more than party label" thing going because that's literally all they have to offer by now (and all the corpo pursestring-holders will allow)
plus, y'know, scads and scads of Rockefeller and Weicker Republicans, many of whom hate the fundaloons and ex-Dixiecrats more than many DUers might--imagine the party loathing if Gerry Boykin was named OUR running mate!
2016-20 may or may not see a shuffling back to more midcentury voting patterns: OTOH that might be bad since any new New England or Midwestern or West Coast Pubs are still voting Pub!
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Vote for the party label our of fear, and they play to those fears.
Sanders threatens to break up that game by getting people to vote for something instead of against something...so both parties have common interest in a way. They both count on fear of the other to stay in power.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)from the waves of tax cuts the thrice-divorced and lecherous pass once they ride waves of Jayzus and "urban-type thugs" into office
Reagan forged a new GOP from four big sectors--MIC, right-libertarians, Big Business, and the fundies: these sectors are all powerful enough to be parties on their own under a parliamentary system, and already act as kingmakers and even have their own publishing houses
hence the constant race-baiting--YOU don't get welfare, you get government assistance, or the constant Holocaust references (I think they already used that card for a construction scandal somewhere but can't Google it on DU): a heated rhetorical atmosphere doesn't just demonize opponents by association or decouple emotion from any real referent (extraordinarily dangerous already), it *empties politics of meaning altogether* (like how the fundies have little to do with the New Testament, or 80% of the Old, or any legitimate rabbinical readings of the remaining ~20%--or in fact have any of their flock change a damn thing about their lives that doesn't match the existing prejudices of the moment)
it's like the Dem loyalists panicking because if you don't vote for a candidate who promotes X, Y, and Z, a Pub will get in and pass X, Y, and Z! OMG YOU'D BE TOTALLY TO BLAME! it's a Baudrillardian nightmare
zeemike
(18,998 posts)thus lots of power. And a lot of it comes from the tax payer in direct or indirect ways.
It clearly looks like a game is being played to me...and the suckers are the people.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and hired Rummy and Cheneybeast for the foreign policy
apparently Barry, Dick, and Ronnie were both Californians who hated the GOP's WASP establishment, and rewired the party to run on resentment pretty soon after Ike stepped down; the neocons took over the Baptists, the NRA, even pharmacists' orgs late 70s
Reagan actually made people swing left and ended up with a Dem Congress most of the time; then Iran-Contra made him a lame duck and the Pubs started whispering that he might be a Commie himself: he only became elevated to godhood with the newest revival/purge of the party in 1994, with Gingrich and the Dixiecrat defections--until then they were sick of being associated with him (he was a bigger dweeb than the guy who made Family Circus if my readings in Simi Valley are anything to go by)
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)If you show you are ruthless and will do anything it takes to further the goal of the job creators you will advance...they have to test your level of sociopath to see if you qualify.
Or if you suck a good dick that could lead to something too.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)But thanks for the warning.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)line when it all collapses.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... when they feel their status threatened.
Thanks for fighting the good fight, MF!
Response to madfloridian (Original post)
Post removed
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)That's pretty blatant, don't you think?
Response to madfloridian (Reply #54)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I agree Bernie is fixing his message to please those who were not happy with it.
I don't agree there are racists in our group.
Response to madfloridian (Reply #74)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I just wish you could believe that because someone disagrees with the way things were done, that does not mean a racial component.
I may be forced to leave DU because of the racist tag on me. There are others who fear the same.
bvf
(6,604 posts)"Illegitimi non carborundum."
Before all the former altar boys and Classics majors crawl out of the woodwork, yes, it's pidgin Latin.
Stick around, Mad, please!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Anyone with an 8th grade reading comprehension level knows you weren't talking about every Bernie supporter. I guess some people like to be a pain in the butt. About the people who are objecting to what you said, an old saying comes to mind- the guilty dog barks first.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Hmmmm
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Please, don't ever leave DU. You are one of my favorites, and your posts on education are always enlightening
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)is guilty of something or other.
It a catch 22 type of phrase.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)It is a bit of an over generalization
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)I have been reading your posts since we were Dean supporters more than ten years ago. You are a sane voice FOR teachers and education. Several of those have left us. Please stick around!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)on members here.
MerryBlooms
(11,776 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I am saying that not all Bernie supporters are what some Clinton supporters claim, and vice versa
Autumn
(45,120 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)If you wish, I will edit that out.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)GOOD, so when can we expect an AA mass exodus from the silent HRC campaign to Bernie?
Will it take 1 more thing or maybe just another or possibly that thing added, WHEN?
delrem
(9,688 posts)Is there no way to escape these despicable haters?
Not even here?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Bernie? He has spoken out in clear terms far more than any of the others and yet you continue to insist that he speak mainly about the social justice message ignoring the economic issues.
And by rejecting him unless he talks only about social justice you are hurting his campaign - while promoting the other candidates. That is why many of us think that this is about damaging Bernie instead of about social justice. Many of us are interested in both because both effect our lives. We want someone who is going to help with both issued. BlackLivesMatter said they are going after the others - have they?
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)We've all encountered them, and the bottom line is that NOTHING Sen. Sanders says or does will ever be good enough for them! For example, Sen. Sanders' comments about the fake Planned Parenthood video were almost word for word the same as PP's director's own words, yet he was mercilessly criticized because he 'should have said more', or some such screwball rationale.
I don't hate ANY of the other candidates, and will support our eventual nominee, yet certain candidates' supporters' hatred of Sen. Sanders is palpable.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I don't think the numbers are how, but they are very vocal and get on one's nerves
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)I just don't get the anger and the spite that motivates them.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Among other things, it's about winners and losers. It sometimes helps to look through that prism. It's similar to "follow the money" but it's different in that a lot of it has to do with a person's identity.
A lot of identity gets hung upon candidates, they become festooned with banners whether they like it or not. They don't just get supporters, they get followers, and self appointed promoters. Their opponents get seen as obstacles not just to them, but to the actualization of the lives of their supporters. A lot of it is just arbitrary. If politician A has irked you, politician B automatically starts looking better.
Any Presidency will involve some people winning influence, jobs, power, money, grants, etc., and the Presidency of Clinton or Sanders would be no different. Though, imo, a Sanders Presidency would involve more losers than winners as he doesn't have to satisfy his donors list. Afaik he doesn't owe any ambassadorial appointments.
But other candidates, if elected, might be obligated to make much greater use of the spoils system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoils_system
But I urge people to look deep into the current campaign before rushing to any easy conclusions.
The losers of a Sanders win have a lot to lose and they won't be showing their hand by choice. It's much easier, and politic, to stir the pot and let others do their work. The more sympathetic those are, the better. The less they need a push, the better.
A Sanders Presidency will be a disaster for those whose resume is built largely on the ability to spew BS on demand. We're talking about the careers of a lot of people. Access to a White House that has a need to spin is a treasured commodity. If the White House starts seeking alternative methods to connect to the voters and people of influence then a lot of careers will have hit a major bump in the road.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)because we need Bernistas to kick this thread,
and there will be more like this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=475844
Please stick around, OK? It's just getting interesting. This is FAR from over.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)I could think of, and am putting the ones I forgot about on ignore as I encounter their posts.
I periodically check the board without logging in to see if there is anything I need to temporarily take them off ignore for.
Orrex
(63,270 posts)If not for Black Lives Matter than for some other issue as the catalyst, and the net effect would be the same. Candidates are under the microscope during primary season, and if he wins the nomination it will only become more intense, and if he wins the election it will become 100x moreso.
It's even worse for Sanders because it's so concentrated; the press has punished Clinton for decades, whereas Sanders has only received this level of attention for a few months, so it's packed in that much more densely.
He had to know that this would happen.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)they want to be heard. I think Bernie Sanders will listen with all seriousness. BLM can't just rely on national politics to get there agenda implemented, they have to work on the state and local government sector as well.
ellennelle
(614 posts)bernie made this point to chuck todd, and i've made it here myself more than once; toward the end of his life, MLK recognized that the fundamental issue is really an economic one, and he was right. capitalists need at least one bottom rung race or whatever (think about it; it was the italians and the irish, etc.) to take care of two important features of their power-hoarding program. one, they need cheap labor; that's the obvious one. two, they also need to keep the pecking order alive so they can manipulate the general population more effectively to keep the cheap labor bottom rung in line (see one, above).
race itself is not what matters, and i mean that with all the double entendre and implication that is loaded into that word, 'matter.' capitalists do not care one bit which race or color or creed or gender fills these 2 roles for their purposes; they just need the purposes to be filled. never forget: to them, NO lives matter, at all; even the ones that produce their work and products are expendable and replaceable. but, here and now, black lives matter least because this currently fills their demands for their system to get them what they want.
this is very important to remember here: to the extend that the corporate world can get and keep the various factions of their machinery at odds with each other, the more control they can maintain over all of us. therefore, it is vital and incumbent upon us each and all to make and keep a united front as our TOP priority right now.
every revolution that ever failed has failed because of infighting. we canNOT let this happen.
so, may i humbly suggest first, that we all agree that it is painfully clear that there is a powerful movement afoot to drive home the very sick opinion that black lives matter least. we cannot deny this, and to say that all lives matter in response to that sentiment is to not just miss the point, but to dismiss it. we owe this much to all our brothers and sisters of color. period.
but second, that said, those brothers and sisters must also recognize that the problems they suffer will NOT go away if police just stop killing black people. i sure wish it were that simple, but it simply is not. this is where it is vitally important to acknowledge that we can only overcome these problems by getting at the root of them, which is economic. we have to stop getting played by the machinery of our rich overlords and level the playing field; only then will the racial issues fade away as irrelevant, because only then can we hope to be rid of this dog-eat-dog mentality capitalism promotes.
dr. king got this. bernie gets this better than anyone running, that is just unequivocally clear. only when we all get this will anything really start to change for the good, and for good.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)john978
(29 posts)or even want to see. The name of the game is getting Bernie nominated+elected. I fear preaching mainly an economics message will resonate with many but not enough votes to win. I hope Bernie's strategists have the numbers to prove me wrong.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... and meet together to lead the campaign towards working together. If the most vocal (and those who are leading) in both campaigns tend towards divisiveness, we lose. This is why leaders like MLK were critical in his day and are today as well, and why we celebrate him so much today and deservedly so. They recognize that effective leadership of these movements means to make sure that those following them aren't feeling the need to push away others that can work together for their goals.
Bernie has never spoken against the BLM movement and has always throughout his career been a fierce advocate for civil rights. Though he emphasizes economic issues, because too many in both parties avoid doing so, and they need to be talked about, we all need to remember that he's doing it to lead us on those issues in a way that no one else has, and that leaders of the BLM movement need to HELP augment what he says (and what he can humanly do without more than one mouth to speak, etc.) to ensure that these messages work together, and each works to emphasize how both sets of issues need to be worked on together, and just because one side mentions the other's emphasized issues less than the other, doesn't mean that either movement feels they are less important.
If the average voter sees these messages working together and the leaders shaping them working together, they'll come to feel that all of these issues need to be worked on and solved for us to make the necessary changes, and those that just advocate one and dismiss the other set of issues aren't being constructive for change in this country.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Some of the wealthiest people in the world have wealth stretching back generations. Wealth from the most nefarious of practices. Some of which, they quite disdain the passing of. And while publicly they will appear as decent folks, now and then the curtain will inadvertently drop and one can clearly see the visage of hate concealed beneath.
TheKentuckian
(25,035 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)You are right mad. I've decided to take a page from the HRC supporters handbook. I will not vote for Hillary because her supporters are just so pushy and mean and need to shut up and listen. They are just so tone deaf.
I don't even care to hear about any of her past work. I just want to know what she intends to do about the poverty that so many in this country face everyday right now.
So there.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)but should he lose the primaries I will not let a group of Internet supporters affect my vote in Nov16. Not voting for the winner of the primary is just as bad as voting republican. There are thing I do not like about Hillary, but she will get my vote on if she wins the nomination
FloriTexan
(838 posts)Vinca
(50,328 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Sorry to indulge this a step further: Bernie Sanders candidacy is like clean, cold water in a field of toxic factory colas and flat bad beer. He's the only one that might possibly clean hands as it slakes thirst.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)Bernie's 50 state economic strategy, now socio-economic is starting to get a foothold in the South. Both the Repubs and Third Wayers are cringing because awakening the huge Repub and Dem economic white vote + the traditional D black vote would be devastating.
So split up social vs economic justice and offer Bernie up as the wedge scapegoat from lily white Vermont. The plan was set in motion with the "optics" memo and now has evolved.
This evolving "optics" strategy is meant to be continual so the status quo remains.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Right on, madfloridian!
still_one
(92,510 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 26, 2015, 08:07 PM - Edit history (1)
That actually is a good thing because it provides an opportunity for those candidates to speak out
I don't think Bernie "humbled" himself before net roots, he stood there, listened, and tried to address their concerns, in spite of the net roots town hall losing control of the event. Anyone who saw the complete videos showed Bernie not only handled himself well, but also addressed the issues.
The candidate who is not getting scrutinized, through no fault of his is OMalley. I have no doubt he wishes he was being scrutinized.
Being scrutinized means people are paying attention to a specific candidate. That is good
KoKo
(84,711 posts)"Chuckie T"...couldn't wait to show Bernie being confronted by "BLM" at the Netroots Nation Campaign Forum.
Bernie talked on and on expressing why he was running and "Chuckie's" Producer never got a chance to show that clip. It was obvious "Chuckie T" didn't know how to deal with a Politician who Speaks the Truth and is not Distracted by the idiocy of any of the MSM's "Hosts" who want to ensnare and trap any Dem Guests.
Bernie did GREAT. I'm sure that didn't go unnoticed by the "Meet the Press Audience" and their Repub Followers.
DON'T MESS WITH BERNIE! He knows "THE GAME" better than the rest of the MSM...TOADIES for CORPORATE INTERESTS.
It was a Fantastic Watch!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Funny thing is that the alerter has transparency showing.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I'm fixing to warn and block someone up thread
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)That's why my post was alerted on? I have no idea what that is.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will "get SJ points" and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle.
Eww...
Autumn
(45,120 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)they're the ones on Tumblr with the weirdly Victorian views on sex and race
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)But, SJW is a term believed to have originated in a camp that believes fighting for social justice is a BAD thing, hence the pejorative nature.
Under no circumstance do I consider fighting for social justice is a bad thing and wouldn't find the term amusing. I would wear it with pride if someone called me a fighter for social justice.
So call me a Social Justice Warrior. I will laugh, put on my SJW badge and wear it with pride.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Wasn't sure what it meant.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Beck says, if your church supports social justice, you should run, not walk, out of that church and never return.
Of course examples of successful efforts to achieve social justice would be the end of the Jim Crow laws, women's suffrage, organized labor rights and even ending slavery itself.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)First, it was about Bernie, and how he "blew it" at NN--although he was shouted down before he could say anything of substance. Now, apparently, Bernie is okay, albeit a slow learner, but his supporters are the problem, and hey, why isn't Bernie standing up for PP?
The common denominator to all of this is that these memes are being tirelessly flogged by Hillary supporters, and all of them benefit Hillary. Color me unsurprised.
V0ltairesGh0st
(306 posts)trying to talk to anyone who thinks in one dimension only...as if their particular hot point issue is the only one that matters. whether or not you feel the same way they do. NOOOOOOOOOOO..... you must be ONLY about that... and nothing else. Well so sorry... no matter how much you want it to be JUST about you.... it's not. Sanders doens't have to live up to his deniers, because some of them are too damn stubborn to understand he is on their side too.
valerief
(53,235 posts)PBass
(1,537 posts)To his credit after the Netroots Nation event, he humbled himself as they wished.
He immediately went to work to adjust his message, even though his decades of work already spoke for him."
Oh my gosh, giving a "WHOLE SPEECH" devoted to talking about how black lives matter? You seem to think the idea of doing that would be a stretch. Well, you are completely wrong.
He "HUMBLED" himself... a white guy HUMBLED himself in front of black activists? (Oh my gosh, isn't that remarkable? Is that even legal?) Do you even think about what you are typing? Do you think Bernie is above the black people whose votes he desperately needs? HUMBLED is a really horrible choice of words.
His "DECADES OF WORK" are in the past. He is almost completely unknown to black voters. He needs their votes to win. Instead of looking at this as "unfair to Bernie" you should see this as a chance for Bernie Sanders to introduce himself to black voters for the very first time.
Hillary Clinton is steamrolling Bernie with her popular support among black voters. This is a chance for Bernie's campaign to turn that around. To win, he's going to have to work harder to reach out to black voters, even if it makes some white people uncomfortable. Deal with it.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)He will still need to do more and more.
The "humble" part was not my word...it was from a co-founder of the group.
This is far more than "unfair". It's a lot more harmful than unfair.
I have been here 13 years, and my posts through those years don't count. That's my point in many ways...Bernie's actions don't matter.
You said: "His "DECADES OF WORK" are in the past."
Why would that be?
PBass
(1,537 posts)If Bernie thinks he is above criticism, or past being questioned, or tired of explaining his record to fresh sets of ears, he's not going to last through the campaign. Because he's going to be taking a LOT of flak, from all sides, from here on out. If that's a problem, then Bernie might not be presidential material.
His "decades of work are in the past" because this is a brand new election, with contemporary issues and problems. At this point the vast majority of Americans have no idea who Bernie Sanders is, or what he believes. Bernie's great record is largely unknown to national voters, and it doesn't give him a pass from challenges on ANYTHING. He is starting from scratch now. Bernie's going to have to explain his point of view and defend his positions, right up until election day. It's not going to be a "coronation for Bernie" either, no matter how much his supporters think he deserves it. Bernie's going to have to fight for every inch, just like everybody else. If he can do that while appearing calm and "presidential" then maybe he can win. He'll have to work extra hard to win over black voters, since many black voters already planned on voting for Hillary, before Bernie even decided to enter the race.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)You don't get what I'm saying, and I am not worrying about that.
Decades of work do matter, or else why bother. Right?
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)Your post is inappropriate in this group.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)"He is almost completely unknown to black voters" Well uhm Google seems to work for me.
wilsonbooks
(972 posts)It is about building a movement. There has not been a solid movement on the left in 40 years. Obama could have led a movement but instead allowed himself to be co-opted. Whether Bernie wins or loses is not as important as whether we are able to build a movement and to keep it focused on specific goals. We have consensus in this country around most of the issues that Bernie is campaigning on. Whether we win or lose this election we must focus on these issues and make change happen. The people united can never be defeated.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)him. In fact, I am still convinced that he is running to protect Clinton from a serious assault from the left, and that he and Clinton will be BFFs at the convention. Because everyone knows exactly how he would be characterized in the general, Sanders most of all. He has lived it.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)Her campaigning "weaknesses" and scandals "are obvious to everyone, including" HRC. I'm "convinced" she's running to "protect" the status quo with the criminal banksters and will fight to the last delegate "at the convention" like she did before.
"Everyone knows exactly how the" Repubs will characterize her in the GE, HRC "most of all". The Clintons have "lived" all the scandals.
udbcrzy2
(891 posts)smokey nj
(43,853 posts)in this group.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)I still believe that those who caused the uproar at Netrrots were puppets, whether they were knowingly or not. Bernie's record is so much better than Hillary's or anyone else who is running on social and economic justice for African Americans. I think he was the only one among the candidates in either party who attended MLK's speech in DC. Bernie has dedicated his life to eradicating the injustices that African Americans face. The irony is that if any other candidate wins, Black Lives Won't Matter to them. The laws passed under Bill Clinton's presidency devastated the AA community and is the direct result of so many AA men being incarcerated. Yet, many would have us believe that Clinton was such a great boon to the lives of African Americans. Hillary is another pawn of the privileged, of the .001%, of Wall Street and the psychopathic financial institutions. If president, she will not further the cause of BLM.
I am sickened by our police. My heart breaks for the men, women, and children senselessly killed and maimed by the police. I want the carnage and injustice and inequality to STOP. But crushing Bernie is playing into the hands of the very people and organizations who have destroyed not only African American lives, but our whole country.
The BLM movement seems more like a astroturf movement than a genuine one since they appear too lazy to check the voting records of those whom they would destroy simply for not adopting their language.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)First, the people who protested at Netroots Nation. Either they didn't do their homework about Sanders, or they wanted the visibility and damn the consequences.
Second, the Black Lives Matter movement, which is larger than its leaders.
Third, people who believe that minority lives matter, but don't necessarily affiliate themselves with #BlackLivesMatter.
In any large movement, there will be people working different agendas, sometimes at cross purposes to each other and the movement's stated goals. That doesn't make BLM an astroturf organization. It's true, though, that Hillary supporters have gone all out to exploit this as if she's somehow the One True Ally of BLM, which is amazing considering the sort of campaign she ran against Obama.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Their tactic was to ambush two of the candidates at Netroots Nation, to "humble them," to bring the issue of police violence against black people to the fore.
In that respect, they succeeded - and BLM should be commended for that. The candidates have all responded with outreach to BLM and have spoken directly to the issue.
At this point, the candidates should get credit for responding positively to BLM's message - firstly, because it would be fair to do so, and secondly, because it's positive reinforcement and will make the candidates more likely to respond positively in the future.
Yet we see no such credit given, just more criticism. From a purely pragmatic point of view, why should anyone try to comply with an interest group's wishes if doing so only earns them more condemnation? It lends credence to the notion that the objective was not to change the candidate's stance or rhetoric, but to simply punish the candidate.
I don't think this was BLM's intention, but it appears that their protest has been co-opted by others with a different agenda.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Not go anywhere, there are times seeing your name at the top of a post are the only cause for celebration I get when I sign in.
You're right. It'll never be enough for the people who's minds are made up.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)should leave the OP. It is within the SOP for our group.
You have received this Alert message because you are currently a Host of the group: Bernie Sanders.
ALERTED DISCUSSION THREAD
-- Author: madfloridian
-- Title: No matter how Bernie adjusts his message, it won't be enough. Not ever.
-- Location: Bernie Sanders
-- Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015, 01:50 PM
-- Link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/128029959
ALERT INFORMATION
-- Sent by: stonecutter357
-- Reason: This discussion thread violates the Statement of Purpose for this forum.
-- Alerter's comments: #BlackLivesMatter.We don't need SJW on DU.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: Bernie Sanders
A group for supporters of Bernie Sanders.
ABOUT THIS ALERT
As a forum Host it is your duty to ensure that threads meet the forum's Statement of Purpose. You are empowered to lock threads which you believe do not meet the Statement of Purpose.
You should only review the thread's originating post (otherwise known as the OP). You are not required to review the replies.
If you believe the OP is off-topic for the forum and/or does not meet the forum's Statement of Purpose, you should lock the thread by clicking the "Super powers" link at the bottom left corner of the OP and selecting the option "Lock thread (Reason: Violates this forum's Statement of Purpose)."
If you choose to lock the thread, a basic explanation -- including your username -- will be pasted automatically into the OP. If you wish to provide a more detailed explanation, you should post your explanation as a reply to the OP before you lock the thread.
The person who posted the OP is permitted to appeal your decision directly via DU Mail. If an appeal is sent, it is your responsibility to consider the merits of the appeal, and decide whether the thread should remain locked. If you decide to unlock it, you can do so by clicking the "Super powers" link on the post.
Only you (or a DU Administrator) will be able to unlock the thread once you have locked it.
Thank you for serving as a Host of the Bernie Sanders forum.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)continues to try to cause problems. IMO that member should be TS'd.
My message to the alerter:
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)At least admins should be aware of the behavior.
zentrum
(9,866 posts)..your analysis. There have been long simmering schisms within the Democratic party, started in part by the Clintons themselves, via the DLC, Rahm Emmanuel etc. and their shift of "the center" to the right.
DFW
(54,506 posts)Win or lose, his campaign has already made a huge difference in the focus on issues. If the country isn't ready as a whole to accept his whole message, so be it. But who is the most memorable loser of the last 50 years? Certainly the name George McGovern comes to mind. A passionate pacifist against a popular (at the time) Republican who continued a war he had promised to end.
They dissed and laughed at McGovern in 1972, but by the end of 1974, Nixon had resigned in disgrace, and by the end of 1975, we were out of Vietnam. McGovern's message may have been before its time, but that doesn't mean it wasn't heard, or, in the long run, accepted as valid. If Bernie does half as well (and I'd say he's already done better than that) as McGovern did in his time, then I would say his campaign has already been a success.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That is a ridiculous statement.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)or are you here to troll the group?
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)They just can't seem to help themselves...
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Bernie is not a true Democrat, because he didn't raise money for the DNC and such, and he can't win, because he doesn't have the money.
I guess that these people are resigned to the fact that WE THE PEOPLE cannot change the crap that is going on with money in politics in this country. If this is true, we are doomed, and I'd better move overseas, and renounce my citizenship NOW. But, as long as Bernie is running for President, I shall stay and help!
The more people hear Bernie, the more support he gets. He just doesn't get support from the Third Way Gang.
katmille
(213 posts)Why isn't he running as an Independent? I'm a progressive and I've followed Bernie and I've been reading the DU comments and I find it a little sad. It is DEMOCRATIC Underground, not INDEPENDENT Underground. I think the important thing is to be sure that the Republicans DO NOT WIN the White House. However we get to that end is the important thing.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)He caucuses with the Democrats, he donates time, effort, and money into the Democratic Party. He might as well be a Democrat. He just feels that there are certain issues that would exclude him from their Party.
Whatever this is, if someone is running for the Party nomination, I don't care if s/he's from the Free Beer Party, and wants a Democratic nomination. If the candidate is a good candidate, I will vote for her/him. We need better people running, not people who are dedicated to the status quo. The status quo sucks!
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)psychmommy
(1,739 posts)I hope he realizes that black people fear for their lives and those of their kids. It is hard to look at the big picture with a gun and badge looming overhead. If Bernie wants black votes, he will have to address black issues. So far he is the only one doing so. After that whole thing went down, a twitter hashtag started as a snarky thing, Bernie so black he........ Well that ended up being an awesome way to introduce him, his record and his actual civil rights history to some of the very people who felt they weren't being addressed. He also went out publicly and addressed those issues. I am definitely a supporter. Bernie gets it but, I see a lot of you don't. This is where I back off and will lend my support but will not exchange with this group.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)I'm not sure that we're the ones who "don't get it".
psychmommy
(1,739 posts)But he is now. Black lives matters is getting our issues out there.Bernie thought it important enough to address them.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)reflects badly on Sanders, don't'cha know" type! DUzy!
psychmommy
(1,739 posts)Bernie gets it, I am positive you don't. Sad, other people have issues outside of yours but you don't deem them worthy. I am very glad Bernie does.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)"So far he is the only one doing so" and "Bernie gets it": so where is the mass exodus of AA voters from Hillary to Bernie.
Why hasn't BLM endorsed Bernie?
psychmommy
(1,739 posts)I don't speak for all black people. I speak for this black woman and he has my vote and some footwork from me.
lark
(23,193 posts)There are lots of die hards here for both HRC and Bernie, so yes, we will see some vitriol. I thought Bernie did a spectacular job on MTP yesterday. He absolutely didn't let Toad get awat with the negative framing he attempted re BLM & the Netroots convention. Bernie was large and in charge and is a great candidate and would be an even better president.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Every presidential campaign, we have people demanding candidates address their issue. Then they demand the candidates address only their issue. Then they demand the media cover only their issue. And so on. This one happens to be a very important issues, and it deserves to receive significant attention, so it's more than "just another issue." But it's not the only issue.
staggerleem
(469 posts)Can someone please explain what it IS about?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)zomgitsjesus
(40 posts)I usually hang at the GOS and it's the same thing there. Clinton supporters are 'concerned' with how Sanders doesn't relate to people of color. They are 180 degrees out and don't let it bother you. It's all they got.
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)GO BERNIE you are more of Democrat than HRC.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)don't like it that Bernie had the gall to run and with a message they do not WANT delivered in this campaign.
It messes things up because now other candidates HAVE to try to 'get with the program' the people WANT because they can't avoid it.
Of course nothing he does will be enough, but they are not the ones who are going to elect him, so their opinions are irrelevant, based on 'politics' not on 'people'.
Bernie IS doing great with the people, THAT is whose opinion we have to pay attention to.