Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forumI don't know what was said in a private conversation between Warren and Sanders
I understand that it was a private conversation between two friends with no one else present. I understand that it had to be a difficult conversation to have, with their personal ambitions in conflict, but with a common sense of purpose in the air. I expect under the circumstances that each felt free to be candid, or to be more accurate, needed to be candid in order to fully discuss what was on the table. I have no reason to doubt that Sanders said something disparaging about the chances for a female candidate to defeat Donald Trump in 2020. I don't know what words were used. It could have been "Liz, I honestly don't think that a woman candidate can defeat Trump against the type of campaign he will run in 2020." Or, conversely, it could have been "America simply isn't ready for a woman to be President in 2020." Those are very different sentiments
From what I can surmise, leaks from that conversation come to us now via someone or ones close to Warren who had previously talked with her about that private conversation. So the leak source was not present to personally witness nuances and full context. Or to hear the actual words spoken. This time there is no transcript. I do know however that a confidence was breached, but Warren may or may not have had any direct role in that.
Does it matter that a confidence was breached? I can't answer that with certainty. It depends. If Sanders or anyone else had said, in confidence, something to the effect that "Women lack the experience needed to be President and the voters know it" Sanders, or anyone else, would deserve to be publicly outed for having those beliefs. But what if, for example, a local civil rights leader in the South had told Barack Obama (in full confidence) before the 2008 Iowa caucus that s/he couldn't endorse Obama because "a Black man will not win the Presidency in 2008." Would that be racist, or simply inaccurate? Without the benefit of hindsight, how outlandish would such a viewpoint have seemed at the time? Would that civil right rights leader have been betraying the cause by privately expressing that view, or would they have just have been being honest about a real pragmatic concern?
Having Trump as President has accented a pragmatic streak in many voters, myself included. Even though two of the three candidates I personally expressed support for during this campaign are female (Harris, and Warren who until recently I listed as my preference) I have kept a closer eye on the general electorate this year than I normally do. I have been willing to consider not voting for my preferred candidate if I end up believing that a different candidate has a significantly better chance of defeating Trump. The main reason why I recently shifted my support from Warren to Sanders is because I came to believe that he is now more electable than she is. I was happy to back her as a woman, that was a plus in my book, but is it among the general electorate now when so many of us just want to back whoever it is who will defeat Trump? Is Biden benefiting from coming closest to the central casting profile of who traditionally gets elected President in America?
There are some hard questions that are difficult for us sometimes to face, but they should be asked none the less. Why did Castro get so little support for President as the only major Hispanic candidate in the race? Hispanics clearly showed more support for white candidates. Was that because of Castro's stance on issues, or did concerns about electability factor in? What about Black potential voters and Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, who both now have dropped out of the race? Do Biden and Sanders better represent African American interests than either of the two major Black candidates who entered the race, or did concerns about electability factor in?
We had a very strong field of female candidates this year which included four sitting U.S. Senators. Two of them failed to make it to the Iowa caucus. One of them is running approximately sixth in the polls, while Elizabeth Warren recently has usually been running third or fourth. Trump has so many people desperate to back whoever it is thought can reliably win in 2020. Maybe that perception has generally hurt the chances of our female candidates in the current political climate. I would love to see a broad based national surge for Warren. I backed her for as long as I did because I was seeing enough evidence of it.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Nanjeanne
(5,003 posts)It is ludicrous to believe that at the same meeting where Elizabeth Warren told me she was going to run for president, I would tell her that a woman couldnt win, Sanders said in a statement.
Two people with knowledge of the conversation at the 2018 dinner at Warrens home told The Washington Post that Warren brought up the issue by asking Sanders whether he believed a woman could win. One of the people with knowledge of the conversation said Sanders did not say a woman couldnt win but rather that Trump would use nefarious tactics against the Democratic nominee.
there is a history of Sanders going back to 1980s saying a woman should be President and this gossip ridden phony scandal crap is a distraction that is dangerous. Personally, Im so weary of this crap. We have serious issues to debate. This is what they are dredging up to harm Sanders?
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)impressed...who'd they call Sirorta? This is not a good look for Sanders.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Nanjeanne
(5,003 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and straight talk. She's earned our trust.
The other quite the contrary. As revealing of character as anyone could need, this candidate has also hired, for the second time, a pack of political attack dogs to spread disinformation and virulent smears, sometimes flat lies, about several Democratic candidates and the Democratic Party, that he apparently doesn't think should come directly from his mouth.
Now, if we must have an opinion on this, who SHOULD we choose to believe?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)happened...article presents not a bit of proof.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
BeyondGeography
(39,388 posts)I think he was trying to discourage her. I dont think he holds retrograde views on women candidates.
I also think Bernie feels deep down he is the one and only candidate who can defeat Trump. The One. This leads to extreme behavior at the supporter level that he does little to nothing to restrain. Its a big problem and it will be his undoing sooner or later. Go into most any twitter thread of Elizabeth Warrens right now and count the Bros. They are a disaster, Tom, and it would be nice if you showed some awareness of it.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
LeftTurn3623
(628 posts)and so what if he feels h is the one and only candidate who can defeat Trump?
nothing wrong with either of those views
the big issue is Warren is losing massive credibility. I was a big Warren fan and for her to leak a private conversation to get a politic advantage makes her untrustworthy - specially when it is with a friend
She tried to do with Pete with the Wine Cellar closed funding meetings when it was proven she took money from private meetings and moved it to her Presidential campaign. Sorry but that is a Trump tactic. Criticize your opponents for same thing you are doing.
All this stuff shows signs of desperation cause she is dropping in poll numbers
This is really sad. I supporter her as my #1 for a long time
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
BeyondGeography
(39,388 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
LeftTurn3623
(628 posts)and I really mean that and this bothers me
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to repeat what other candidates say to them, but in many cases it's the ethical thing to do. We're in the "discovery" phase of this primary where we learn who these people are, remember?
Sanders has a history of problems with women. He's hired a bunch to combat that image, but that long history is well known to include a preference for working with men for just one thing.
He's ideologically egalitarian (universal, collectivist solutions require that), thus not ideologically misogynist. And in real life he's probably not any more than typical for leftist men of his generation whose views were first formed in the 1940s and 1950s. (My husband's Sanders' age and still draws a "put it back in the box, Bub" glare from me by chortling over some ancient sexist joke one of his elderly friends has sent.)
What's obvious from observation and research is that his political passions and goals are extremely strong and very narrow, and his big picture goals are all encompassing. Women, minorities, etc., will be uplifted with everyone else once universalist systems are imposed.
As for this, we know Sander'd say far, far worse than this in attempts to eliminate competition because he does. All the time. In fact, he hires whole packs of attack dogs to do far more of it than he can by himself.
We also know Warren has a good history of honesty and integrity. And of being a woman.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)to dig their way back up at Bernie's expense. I don't for 1 second believe that after he asked her to run in 2016, that he would in 2018 tell her a woman will not get elected. It is a totally false narrative, and you know you have lost when you have Morning Joe saying it's ludicrous.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
BeyondGeography
(39,388 posts)When Bernie wanted Warren to run he was a national nobody compared with Warren. Two years later, he was the darling of the left. Shes in the way, so his view changed. Is that so hard to understand?
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)later.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
BeyondGeography
(39,388 posts)Hate to break it to you, but he is human.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Wawannabe
(5,686 posts)Democrat, Independent. Democrat, Independent! The hell you say? Whatever!
Make up your mind Bernie!
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Wawannabe
(5,686 posts)But I wont get that now will I?
Either way. When he doesnt get the nomination (again) he is gonna hose us all!
You included.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)would be Trump, which is why Bernie did not run as an independent.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)A betrayal of that magnitude which would perhaps give Trump four more years and would be unforgivable.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Wawannabe
(5,686 posts)Clinton (a woman) got millions more popular votes!
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)longer be on the Democratic Party's side if he ran against our nominee, and I don't think Sanders will run indie by the way...purely hypothetical.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)But not of course the bullshit embellishment shit...this person never said that. So this has been out there since the race started...but what I find unforgivable is the embellishment and quick to anger( we woman are emotional wrecks woman and all ) defense put out by the Sander's campaign...it is bullshit...it infuriates me.
How many times have women been put down in this manner...while some less talented and in some cases not even very smart man has been been tapped to reinforce a talented hardworking woman's opinions or facts...yes this is biographical. It happened to me more than once, and it makes me see red every time it happens to any woman. This is why I care about this matter even if I am a Biden supporter. I am not sure a woman can win in sexist America, but don't call an accomplished smart woman who is trying to break the glass ceiling and win the White House a person who 'embellishes' stories or facts...not when you are running as a Democrat. Don't go there! It is disrespectful offensive to me and I would wager to other women as well.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)I don't believe for one minute any Warren person said that to any Sanders supporter...either...and yeah as a woman I am offended...I think if this keeps up Sander is toast with women He should be quiet and let it blow over...instead of calling first a campaign person for Warren a liar, than calling Warren herself a liar and then sending out his campaign to say she is quick to anger, and embellishes her statements. These are all dog whistles for women and we won't be pleased if he continues...too many of us have experience with this sort of thing.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
samnsara
(17,651 posts)... but its something voters will have to conclude for themselves.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Wawannabe
(5,686 posts)Bernie not so much.
He is toast. And there will be sour grapes when he doesnt get the nomination.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)I don't think you understand how offensive this ill thought out Sanders defense is to women. He does himself further damage by using it.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)Then we'll all know the truth.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
TidalWave46
(2,061 posts)This has been posted here before.
Bernie Sanders' Sexism Problem
Harpers Bazaar
Then there is his rape fantasy that he had published when he was younger.
The fact that his campaign workers were forced to unionize because he brushed off the admitted problems of sexual harassment and worse from his 16 campaign.
His recent endorsement of known sexist Cenk Uygur.
I think this is a topic that we should be able to openly discuss here on DU. Unfortunatley, some of Sanders own statements about women are so degrading that they are not allowed to stand on DU. We can not have an honest debate about his history because of our own rules.
I compare Sanders and his views on women to that of Gabbart and her views on the LGBQT community. They hold highly offensive and oppressive views yet feel the government shouldn't put policies in place that would further oppression. That is a very personal thing that people have to work through.
I fully believe Sanders disparaged her based on gender. His history shows that is a part of who he is. Sometimes what makes sense is what happened. Sanders is a hostile individual who displays inherent sexist beliefs. He does not allow his personally held beliefs to make their way into his amendments.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Omen78
(81 posts)was divulged as she is losing momentum and falling behind Bernie... Just saying. Frankly, I dont believe her.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Omen78
(81 posts)primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,735 posts)comments. She is telling the truth...and I am not even a supporter. I don't agree with Warren on everything, but she is not a liar.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden