Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
9. No parents were jailed. in every case, she cut a deal, and waived the fine.
Sat Feb 2, 2019, 10:30 AM
Feb 2019

Last edited Sat Feb 2, 2019, 11:19 AM - Edit history (3)

They were told to show up at court. If they agreed to a plan for getting the kids to school, fines were waived.

Whatever her "giddiness" in front of that audience, her actions were to avoid jailing parents, because that would have meant that the policy had failed:










Further details on the mechanics and procedures involved in the truancy initiative can be found here, but the key point is that the purpose of the program was not to criminally prosecute or jail parents of truant children. In fact, such an outcome would mean the program had failed. Its purpose was to use the threat of prosecution to “bring parents to the table” and initiate a series of steps that (crucially) involved providing services and resources to parents and did indeed have the effect of lowering the rate of truancy in San Francisco.


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-homeless-mother/
Yes, I find it very troubling, but also the fact that she seemed actually giddy with joy about it. vsrazdem Jan 2019 #1
I'm willing to put the giddiness on the tape down to politics Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #4
Another misleading hit piece.. Callado119 Jan 2019 #2
The article is based on her own words and policy decisions Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #3
I'm sure only white wealthy San Franciscans were jailed and fined. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2019 #5
I'm sure you'll be relieved to hear that no SF parents were. ehrnst Feb 2019 #10
Nonsense Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2019 #23
Can you cite where she campaigned for the Truancy law? ehrnst Feb 2019 #11
Here you go Ms. Toad Feb 2019 #12
Thank you. I understand she jailed no parents, and waived any fines if they ehrnst Feb 2019 #13
Sam Seder's thoughts with the video. aidbo Jan 2019 #6
Thank you - Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #7
You're welcome, of course. Left is best! aidbo Jan 2019 #8
No parents were jailed. in every case, she cut a deal, and waived the fine. ehrnst Feb 2019 #9
Honestly I'm glad the truancy issues are being addressed nini Feb 2019 #14
Arresting and charging a homeless mom of 3 who is working 2 jobs to make ends meet Ms. Toad Feb 2019 #21
There's a difference between unexcused and excused absences nini Feb 2019 #22
Sometimes truancy happens because a parent doesn't give a damn dsc Feb 2019 #15
And because the accusations have been about her "building a career on jailing black parents" ehrnst Feb 2019 #16
And she also arrested a homeless mother of three, working two full-time jobs Ms. Toad Feb 2019 #17
she threatened the first with jail dsc Feb 2019 #18
These are the circumstances: ehrnst Feb 2019 #24
This is a great lesson in why we need to study Montesquieu and limited government Bucky Feb 2019 #19
Perfectly stated. n/t Ms. Toad Feb 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A place Harris will need ...»Reply #9