Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ColinC

(8,355 posts)

5. You are probably right.

Reply to madville (Reply #4)

Tue Jan 18, 2022, 08:07 PM

Jan 2022

Of course Manchin has been sympathetic to bringing back the talking fillibuster. Requiring 3/5ths present vs duly elected would do just that. I imagine he might get behind that. And with the pressure from Emily's list now, maybe Sinema will too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should we require 3/5 of senators present v 3/5 duly elected senators to maintain the fillibuster? [View all] ColinC Jan 2022 OP

I think that's already the rule. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2022 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author SoCalDavidS Jan 2022 #2

No. ColinC Jan 2022 #3

Tweaking the rules isn't on the table madville Jan 2022 #4

You are probably right. ColinC Jan 2022 #5

Manchin isn't going to support changing the rules by a simple majority. tritsofme Jan 2022 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author ColinC Jan 2022 #7

Wait did his recent statement say exactly what you stated? ColinC Jan 2022 #8

Yes, that's what he's referring to. tritsofme Jan 2022 #10

bleh... ColinC Jan 2022 #11

Whatever it is manchin will oppose it Fullduplexxx Jan 2022 #9