Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Garland hater ping [View all]

brush

(53,844 posts)
88. Judge Chutkan is doing a good job, has to wait on SCOTUS to rule on whether trump is immune on criminal charges.
Fri Feb 23, 2024, 12:25 AM
Feb 23

But considering Garland, somehow his slowness always seems to favors republicans. It's going on 4 years and there is suspicion that some coup participants are still serving in congress, trump is still running around delaying, delaying, delaying, hoping his appointed judges/justices go along with the obvious plan to allow motion after motion after motion to run out the clock on bringing the 91 felony indictments to trial until after the election, or so close to the election that he can keep yelling that he's a victim of a witch hunt.

And so far Judge loose Cannon and the SCOTUS 6 are complying. SCOTUS for some reason is delaying ruling on the couldn't-be-more-goddam-obvious DC Circuit Court's decision that no one is above the law, even a president, is not immune from breaking the law.

Garland's first order of business on taking office should've been starting an investigation on not just the foot soldiers on J6, but also the planners of the attempt to overthrow the government of the United States...it's so obvious it should've been the very first job of the Attorney General to attend to.

But no, trump and others were running around non-indicted for a couple of years. If Garland had started investigating the attempt to overthrow the government of the United States immediately on taking office we would not be faced with whether trump can run-out-the-clock before the election.

Come on, if not for the House J6 Select Committee putting the DOJ, with way more investigative resources to shame, we wouldn't be here watching the clock tick down like in a football game.

trump should've already been tried, most likely convicted, a year ago. I mean it took how long, how many attempts in the slam-dunk MAL docs case to get him to return just the documents he stole...and he's still got some (DOJ's FBI agents missed finding a secret room with even more stolen, and still retained, hidden docs).

But no, Garland waited way too long to appoint Special Counsel Smith (doing a great job btw), when no special counsel was needed. He, the Attorney General should've taken direct charge of the investigation of the attempt to overthrow the government of the United States. He himself, the AG, that's his job.

But no, his hesitance, timidity, or whatever you call it, some may see it as guile even, him being a Federalist Society recommendation, he went the special counsel route for others to do his job. Hell he even appointed a republican-appointed special counsel, Hur, to go after Biden's docs case. It took years and produced a bang-up, near-400-page, hit job report on Biden which Garland read and released without editing out the blatant HIT JOB comments on "the old, slow, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory not fit to be president." The exoneration of Biden was some 200 pages deep into the report, where as the exoneration of former VP Pence for his similar docs case, took one page and much less time to exonerate Pence with no hit job commentary.

Did I mention Garland is a Federalist Society recommendation, the outfit that generates a list of all the extreme, right wing judges/justices that republican presidents appoint to courts from, including Judge Cannon and the SCOTUS 6 btw?

Is Garland a republican party mole whose, I'll be kind, DELIBERATE moves take much time and seem to always favor the republican party, and trump?

It's too late now but IMO after Biden wins the election, Garland should immediately be thanked for his services and shown the door before he can do more damage.

I still can't believe he released that Hur report without editing out the hit job stuff. Talk about a passive-aggressive stabbing of Biden in the back...

Garland hater ping [View all] Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 OP
we dont have endless time with this thing- there is the rub Blues Heron Feb 22 #1
It's largely out of their hands now Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #2
All I see are foot soldiers going to jail for 1/6 where are the higher ups? Blues Heron Feb 22 #17
What you see is not consistent with what has happened. Beastly Boy Feb 22 #41
There is no space between understanding the gravity of the event and. moving with urgency to protect the Republic TheKentuckian Feb 22 #72
DOJ is a tool of the government. They don't pass the laws, they follow them. Beastly Boy Feb 22 #78
I don't think I even implied that the DOJ was a legislative body. TheKentuckian Feb 22 #83
This is the persistent shortcoming that I see in critics of DOJ: Beastly Boy Feb 23 #89
Jerry Nadler asks DOJ to investigate former US Attorney Scott Brady for false testimony about Smirnov republianmushroom Feb 23 #90
It looks like you are trying to make a point. Beastly Boy Feb 23 #91
Judge Chutkan is doing a good job, has to wait on SCOTUS to rule on whether trump is immune on criminal charges. brush Feb 23 #88
Hasn't Smith gotten off the pot? live love laugh Feb 22 #13
Hard not to hate a guy trying to take down our democracy and rule of law. Irish_Dem Feb 22 #3
In the context of the OP, I find your conception of our democracy and rule of law puzzling. Beastly Boy Feb 22 #42
Former FBI spy hunter pleads guilty to working for Russian oligarch republianmushroom Feb 22 #77
I said "undermines, not "affirms". Beastly Boy Feb 22 #81
If he was not undermining our democracy or rules of law, then why was he arrested republianmushroom Feb 22 #82
Let's see if you can answer this riddle yourself, shall we? Beastly Boy Feb 22 #84
Non one here hates Garland. But from what most see he's doing as little as possible. Autumn Feb 22 #4
See Post #3. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #5
That says it's hard not to hate him doesn't say they hate him. The problem is he has gone after the low handing fruit Autumn Feb 22 #24
You are being too kind. comradebillyboy Feb 22 #6
I strongly dislike him Tribetime Feb 22 #16
There should be no pinning of roses on MOMFUDSKI Feb 22 #7
Nothing I see here praises Garland. It just confirms what most know. live love laugh Feb 22 #12
Sometimes deliberately. Think. Again. Feb 22 #62
I hate no one, gab13by13 Feb 22 #8
March 16, 2021, eh? Garland was sworn in March 11, 2021. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #9
And appointed Jack Smith edhopper Feb 22 #11
Appointing the Special Counsel was NOT the start of the investigation Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #14
Like Hur or Weiss? edhopper Feb 22 #18
Like Hur & Weiss were not the start of their investigations either. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #19
Like I said edhopper Feb 22 #21
So you want to censor me. Repeatedly. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #25
You simply don't know what you're talking about Fiendish Thingy Feb 22 #20
Garland is 0 fer 2 in appointing special counsels gab13by13 Feb 22 #26
Sounds like you don't understand how investigations work either Fiendish Thingy Feb 22 #38
True, but some people do. republianmushroom Feb 22 #74
Because i dislike cilantro, shouldnt i also dislike garlic? getagrip_already Feb 22 #10
President Biden's lawyers gab13by13 Feb 22 #27
Yes, but you forget that there is a dead horse that must be beaten. Ocelot II Feb 22 #15
Talk to us after the stall allows cases to linger MOMFUDSKI Feb 22 #22
My question is whether complaining about it ad nauseam will change anything. Ocelot II Feb 22 #23
Tim Heaphy, lead J6 investigator gab13by13 Feb 22 #32
Assuming all of this to be true, how does complaining about it constantly Ocelot II Feb 22 #35
its a message board - its why they exist, to bitch about shit and see if like minded souls are on the same page Blues Heron Feb 22 #48
If there is no complaining and ineptness isn't addressed, will get better ? republianmushroom Feb 22 #79
The answer is no, but more people will be aware of the ineptness of Garlands justus department. That's a good thing. Autumn Feb 22 #33
All I see is the perpetuation of the narrative which is favored by a certain faction on DU Beastly Boy Feb 22 #50
its a bitch sesh, we were asked by the OP specifically to come and bitch, here we are. Doesnt amount to a hill of beans Blues Heron Feb 22 #51
Sounds about right, but this bitch sesh has been going on for months without any invitations. Beastly Boy Feb 23 #86
How deep is that. Autumn Feb 22 #55
No words of wisdom intended. Beastly Boy Feb 23 #87
Intentional ignorance is helpful when one starts with conclusions rather than facts. TwilightZone Feb 22 #45
Haters? You're calling us haters? CrispyQ Feb 22 #28
If you don't self-identify as some level of Garland/Willis/Bragg hater then you are not being called out Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #31
I don't call people who disagree with me haters but have at it. -nt CrispyQ Feb 22 #37
Likewise, I don't call people who simply disagree with me haters. But further, I know Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #43
It is hard to debate with anyone gab13by13 Feb 22 #44
Funny you should say this. Beastly Boy Feb 22 #52
Yeah we don't hate. pwb Feb 22 #29
Oh, I see... Think. Again. Feb 22 #30
So you're an all-or-nothing black-or-white kind of person it seems Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #36
It is actually yes or no... Think. Again. Feb 22 #40
Partisanship is not black-or-white Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #47
Not similar at all... Think. Again. Feb 22 #49
Agree malaise Feb 22 #34
"Hur was appointed after there already was a Special Counsel for tRump documents, so it was an unusual situation." gab13by13 Feb 22 #39
I think its been explained to you that Special Counsels are appointed to investigate whether a crime has been committed onenote Feb 22 #46
And the FBI can't do that? gab13by13 Feb 22 #57
What is THAT supposed to mean? Beastly Boy Feb 22 #54
Nobody "hates" claudette Feb 22 #53
Comparing Garland and Willis seems utterly absurd to me BeyondGeography Feb 22 #56
Nice post, maybe you can answer this question I asked before, gab13by13 Feb 22 #60
You make some good points, starting with first one Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #63
This R House will impeach anything with a D next to it BeyondGeography Feb 22 #65
Yes, agree with those points and well stated. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #66
The fact that there are so many displeased with Garlands foot dragging is a sign that maybe you are flying_wahini Feb 22 #58
Your post starts with a false premise Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #59
I guess I read it wrong. You say that it takes time but Fani is running circles around them. flying_wahini Feb 22 #61
Agree, we don't have much time left, before the election. But that's not the final say-so on tRump Bernardo de La Paz Feb 22 #64
I don't hate Garland. I just hate his way of thinking about politics... ananda Feb 22 #67
This is the reality MorbidButterflyTat Feb 22 #68
*Snork!* What a crock. Scrivener7 Feb 22 #69
There is more republianmushroom Feb 22 #70
We are all Veruca Salt when it comes to justice Generic Brad Feb 22 #71
37 months and counting is not now, in my book. republianmushroom Feb 22 #73
Hate? No, I just don't grasp the adulation and find him dangerously worthless. TheKentuckian Feb 22 #75
I don't hate Garland, I just find his squeaking irritating. jalan48 Feb 22 #76
Garland wasn't slow about one thing: the Hassler Feb 22 #80
The problem is, Garland is still fucking up, unfortunately. We have to beg him to do his job ecstatic Feb 22 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Garland hater ping»Reply #88