General Discussion

EndlessWire

(6,580 posts)

37. Popok said

Sun Mar 10, 2024, 01:54 PM

Mar 10

that the bond date preceded his whiny appeal to the Judge, that he must have had the bond already when he was begging for a three day extension. Popok has lots of experience in law, and I think his eyeballs are trustworthy. He's trained to see these details.

So, what does this mean? If the Judge sees this, can't he conclude that Trump is playing fast and loose with the Court? Isn't this perjury, to tell a Judge you need an extension to do something, when you've already done it? And, does the bond company have any duty to inform the Court?

I dunno. I hate Trump so much.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Jen Pskaki has these two guys on - Neil Katyal and Andrew Weissman - and boy are they spewing some crazy shit [View all] FHRRK Mar 10 OP

Can't tell if this is cilla4progress Mar 10 #1

see post 2! FHRRK Mar 10 #4

Time and again these legal heavyweights are proven correct in their analysis of court events. rubbersole Mar 10 #14

Did they predict that the Colorado case would be decided 9-0 ? MichMan Mar 10 #67

yes nearly everyone did. jcgoldie Mar 10 #94

Some seem to feel the need to find a conspiracy behind every corner. brooklynite Mar 10 #20

Fail! FHRRK Mar 10 #24

Trump is known to do business with Russia TexasBushwhacker Mar 10 #40

We have every right to know who put up that money dsc Mar 10 #44

I believe you missed Illegal! FHRRK Mar 10 #53

perhaps you could try Google. Maybe I was a bit harsh so updated. Demsrule86 Mar 10 #95

OK let me try to explain FHRRK Mar 11 #98

Yes, indeed! colorado_ufo Mar 10 #56

No, I don't think we do, the $ providers do. elleng Mar 10 #61

You again with this crappola? What are you trying to prove? You posted this yesterday... brush Mar 12 #103

OKAY! FHRRK Mar 12 #105

Yup, sarcasm... nt mitch96 Mar 10 #16

Maybe it IS sarcasm, the "Pskaki" spelling might be a clue. Towlie Mar 10 #19

Or ignorance. Or an insult. Who can say? dchill Mar 10 #49

Is ii sarcasm or not? Katinfl Mar 10 #66

Me either YoshidaYui Mar 10 #35

it better be because it's bullshit... agingdem Mar 10 #45

I wouldn't loan Trump Mr.Bill Mar 10 #59

Yes, you are right. I have great respect for both. Blue Dawn Mar 10 #76

LOL! mobeau69 Mar 10 #54

Just a reminder... both of these guys are "Content Creators" WarGamer Mar 10 #2

Yeah yeah yeah. Go on triron Mar 10 #5

Yep. Tv shows are simply vehicles for advertisers. Marcus IM Mar 10 #6

This is "both of these guys" sarcasm, right? ancianita Mar 10 #47

Yeah obviously these guys are lightweights senseandsensibility Mar 10 #77

Doesn't that apply homegirl Mar 10 #58

every damn one of them. WarGamer Mar 10 #73

Both have solid, legal credentials and experience to back up what they say and question. brush Mar 10 #69

Are you okay? Think. Again. Mar 10 #3

It's sarcasm senseandsensibility Mar 10 #43

Did you possibly mean the 91.6 million bond? PatSeg Mar 10 #7

Agree totally Frances Mar 10 #8

President Biden needs to know who is financially helping TFG. Delmette2.0 Mar 10 #55

Okay, there's this PatSeg Mar 10 #9

For the love of all things Holy! FHRRK Mar 10 #12

A sarcasm thingie is needed. Why would you call out those 2 and not think you would get severe pushback? Srkdqltr Mar 10 #17

Yeah in this case, PatSeg Mar 10 #25

A sarcasm gif is definitely needed. Your post sounds like it's from a trolll. This "crazy shit" is no joking matter. brush Mar 10 #72

Duly noted FHRRK Mar 10 #81

Probably best to post an argument clearly without it seeming to be from a troll. brush Mar 10 #92

FWIW, I thought your op and its sarcasm were clear. But spooky3 Mar 12 #101

I trust these two experts implicitly Bayard Mar 10 #31

Me too, more than most PatSeg Mar 10 #34

My only concern with the two is they may have too much face in the legal system Bobstandard Mar 12 #117

The fact that someone like Trump Mr.Bill Mar 10 #64

Totally with you. triron Mar 10 #83

I know PatSeg Mar 10 #87

Lately I've been watching independent media more - cilla4progress Mar 10 #10

My question has always been whether it really matters how TFG is funding the bond. Ocelot II Mar 10 #11

They are not mutually exclusive concerns FHRRK Mar 10 #22

I thought the Judge was ordering a reply from Carroll EndlessWire Mar 10 #32

I have always thought that it was Musk who is putting up the collateral or cash for the bond. Bev54 Mar 12 #111

Here we are running against the most vile candidate in history, and we are worried about a bond that will make Silent Type Mar 10 #13

Yup. Maybe he got a sack of money to pay for it when Orban visited Mierda-Lardo. Ocelot II Mar 10 #27

Popok said EndlessWire Mar 10 #37

The judge has to approve the bond. If he thinks there was something untoward about it, Ocelot II Mar 10 #78

Thank you. EndlessWire Mar 10 #80

I am wondering whether TFG tried to submit inaccurate or incomplete financials Ocelot II Mar 10 #86

I think Trump is conniving EndlessWire Mar 10 #89

I doubt that the CEO of the Chubb Group, Evan Greenberg, has anything to do Ocelot II Mar 10 #90

You could be right. EndlessWire Mar 10 #93

Sounds like someone just fell off the turnip truck Prof. P.E. Name Mar 10 #15

+1 mitch96 Mar 10 #18

No, some people just don't warn they are using sarcasm Maeve Mar 10 #21

Well done Doc Sportello Mar 10 #23

There you go! FHRRK Mar 10 #29

When trump is involved Turbineguy Mar 10 #26

I guess we are all stupid, uneducated conspiracy nuts. Irish_Dem Mar 10 #28

WWG1WGA? Fiendish Thingy Mar 10 #30

Glenn Kirschner is also asking the same questions. Irish_Dem Mar 10 #33

I believe I used the "elitist" meme FHRRK Mar 10 #38

I agree completely. Why insult and demean people who are just asking questions? Irish_Dem Mar 10 #41

Let's see, Donald didn't have the money, met with dictators, now he has the money.He shouldn't get benefit of the doubt Walleye Mar 10 #36

They talked about the weather and high school friends dalton99a Mar 10 #82

I wonder what the intersection of those edhopper Mar 10 #39

lol, hadn't considered that! FHRRK Mar 10 #68

Well we'd better give TSF full immunity dweller Mar 10 #42

There is a point that both Neal and Andrew brought up that matters. bluesbassman Mar 10 #46

That would be a job for investigative journalism. Mr.Bill Mar 10 #79

A rare breed to be sure. bluesbassman Mar 10 #85

Orban Hikerchick57 Mar 11 #99

That's possible, sure. bluesbassman Mar 12 #100

As Nancy so eloquently said mountain grammy Mar 10 #48

Regardless of who put up the actual money, Trump HAS TO file it as "income" on his taxes. world wide wally Mar 10 #50

Elon Musk also visited Mar-el- Loco. gab13by13 Mar 10 #51

He is my guess of who guaranteed the bond, as I said in an earlier comment, that does not Bev54 Mar 12 #112

Lol...these two guys! Hope22 Mar 10 #52

musk is a putin et tu Mar 10 #57

Glad I missed the 2, I'd have thought it's Collateral, and wonder why they think there's more to it than that. elleng Mar 10 #60

Thanks, I needed a laugh! 58Sunliner Mar 10 #62

What the fu_k? Enjoy your stay. brush Mar 10 #63

They are being sarcastic to make a point about a perceived spooky3 Mar 12 #102

You're responding to a post I made yesterday. He/she just posted the same thing today. brush Mar 12 #104

I didn't post jack shit today FHRRK Mar 12 #106

Why is it up again? brush Mar 12 #107

Becuase you responded! ?????? FHRRK Mar 12 #109

Same thread from yesterday that has been bumped up because there are new responses. PufPuf23 Mar 12 #110

Sarcasm, ok, not particularly clever sarcasm though. brush Mar 12 #113

omg! ARE YOU IMPLYING THAT THEY WERE IMPLYING THAT WE SHOULDN'T TRUST TRUMP TO BE ABOVE BOARD? orleans Mar 10 #65

If Trump becomes President his bond is a national security risk and we should know who he's beholden to. LetMyPeopleVote Mar 10 #70

Thanks for the videos FHRRK Mar 10 #84

The fact that TFG is or may be beholden to third parties or foreign govts will be an issue LetMyPeopleVote Mar 10 #88

Sarcasm? Pachamama Mar 10 #71

Yes, please! ShazzieB Mar 10 #96

Seth Abramson sub Reddit documents it Pokeemahn Mar 10 #74

MSNBC pundit lawyers are concerning Sympthsical Mar 10 #75

+1000 nt WarGamer Mar 12 #114

Seriously! Hope22 Mar 10 #91

Why sarcasm emojis serve a useful purpose, and why no one should disdain their use. ShazzieB Mar 10 #97

Someone posted about "Chubb Russia" and the conspiracy folks went nuts. Carroll's team approved the bond Silent Type Mar 12 #108

Neil Katyal and Andrew Weissman chillfactor Mar 12 #115

I was listening to Lawrence for moniss Mar 12 #116