Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(16,150 posts)

3. I said the same, but many said to pay up front

Thu Mar 28, 2024, 08:33 PM

Mar 28

and then go after insurance companies. I guess it makes sense so the building can begin immediately.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I suppose it is outrageous FBaggins Mar 28 #1

I said the same, but many said to pay up front jimfields33 Mar 28 #3

I think the insurance companies would probably fight it. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 28 #4

Yes. That would be MOMFUDSKI Mar 28 #6

I guess a depression for Maryland may be avoided. How applegrove Mar 28 #2

Fine, let's not rebuild it. maxsolomon Mar 28 #5

Federal highway money. There was an Interstate crossing it. sinkingfeeling Mar 28 #7

I'd argue that bridge has a national economic security value... WarGamer Mar 28 #8

He's always a moron to me struggle4progress Mar 28 #9

Of course. It's not in his district. lees1975 Mar 28 #11

a better idea moonshinegnomie Mar 28 #12

Well fuck 'em. What else are they going to use to pay for it? Initech Mar 28 #13

Route I-695, the Baltimore Beltway, ran across the Key Bridge. patphil Mar 28 #14

It's outrageous that puke's outrage is so outrageously fake. nt The Unmitigated Gall Mar 28 #15