Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(18,980 posts)

11. When media outlets were advising to not say terrorist

Tue Apr 16, 2024, 01:37 PM

Apr 16

because that is a loaded term and judgmental, wasn't there support for avoiding inflammatory language?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sickeming malaise Apr 16 #1

And THAT's the nation's "paper of record." Kid Berwyn Apr 16 #2

NYT covertly pushing gaslighting Celerity Apr 17 #18

Hm. Maybe I'll restart my subscription. BannonsLiver Apr 16 #5

I approve of this post. Mossfern Apr 16 #6

Never stopped. maxsolomon Apr 16 #10

At least they have the journalistic honesty... appmanga Apr 16 #7

Good decsion by the NY Times. DavidDvorkin Apr 16 #8

Shame on the NYT edhopper Apr 16 #9

When media outlets were advising to not say terrorist sarisataka Apr 16 #11

Am I supposed to be mad they won't use propaganda? Sympthsical Apr 16 #12

So they won't be spreading Hamas propaganda? Good. nt LexVegas Apr 16 #13

Good. Report objectively and use words properly. betsuni Apr 16 #14

Are we back to calling dead civilians "Collateral Damage" yet? Ping Tung Apr 16 #16