General Discussion

Layzeebeaver

(1,631 posts)

46. Which also imply the law could have been written more clearly.

Reply to Walleye (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 17, 2024, 10:34 AM

Apr 17

Definitions are important

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the hell is going on with the US Supreme Court? [View all] kentuck Apr 16 OP

Don't conclude anything important from media's presentations, elleng Apr 16 #1

But what is complex about whether those that invaded our Capitol "obstructed" justice... kentuck Apr 16 #3

Several parts of the legislation at issue make an otherwise simple matter elleng Apr 16 #6

The law seems to work fine and be cut and dried when regular people commit crimes. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #27

It seems like Alito and Gorsuch didn't know the difference between obstructing and disrupting Walleye Apr 16 #2

Which also imply the law could have been written more clearly. Layzeebeaver Apr 17 #46

Most men learn from their dad's DENVERPOPS Apr 17 #50

Yes they legitimize civil rights for insurrectionists just after stripping them from women bucolic_frolic Apr 16 #4

Yes make draconian laws to control and punish women. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #28

They are about to give Joe Biden Presidential immunity. Good. pwb Apr 16 #5

Oh no, the immunity will be only for Trump. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #29

Nah, they will make another "narrow" ruling Bettie Apr 17 #34

The MAGAs are drunk with power and out of control. Initech Apr 16 #7

Simple answer: they are corrupt. Mike Niendorff Apr 16 #8

I really think this is 100 percent correct. BlueKota Apr 16 #10

Their Mantra is: DENVERPOPS Apr 16 #20

It's so sad this is what they've become BlueKota Apr 17 #37

this. barbtries Apr 16 #12

Yup,... what he said up above.... magicarpet Apr 16 #13

Need to get corruption out of the USSC before the needed expansion. PufPuf23 Apr 17 #24

Exactly, this is the correct answer: CORRUPT SUPREME COURT. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #31

I doubt the house would do that. jimfields33 Apr 17 #35

I agree completely. But to accomplish the necessary changes wnylib Apr 17 #49

You know what might wake them up? Baitball Blogger Apr 16 #9

They have no shame and no reason to feel uneasy. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #32

But, not too long ago they were trying to get more protection Baitball Blogger Apr 17 #43

Power is used to protect themselves. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #44

Without question, since Scalia's term, this has been what's behind the conservative Supreme's Baitball Blogger Apr 17 #45

They're not going to rule that Trump has immunity Fiendish Thingy Apr 16 #11

I suspect they will DENVERPOPS Apr 16 #21

They've already agreed to hear the case next week. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 17 #23

They've agreed to "hear it," next week but they don't have to rule on it anytime soon. BlueKota Apr 17 #38

correct FHRRK Apr 17 #41

They want to find a loophole for every law designed to protect democracy. Karadeniz Apr 16 #14

What was once a Supreme Court The Wizard Apr 16 #15

The SC is crossing over into pure evil. Irish_Dem Apr 17 #33

They are about to re-issue the 'Dred Scot decision'.... DemocraticPatriot Apr 16 #16

They don't care. Mr. Evil Apr 16 #17

My European history professor BlueKota Apr 17 #39

I Smell A Rat Old Enough 2 Apr 16 #18

The right wing nutjobs were hired to support the dictatorship of Republicans / Trump relayerbob Apr 16 #19

Yup. A couple of these black robed bums... Joinfortmill Apr 16 #22

Maybe the right wing radical elders... returnee Apr 17 #25

The wingnuts have been compromised. spanone Apr 17 #26

The founders thought most would be interested in the betterment of the US. RKP5637 Apr 17 #30

To be honest BlueKota Apr 17 #40

The founders seem to believe in the 'goodness' of lawmakers. Surprise Surprise!! riversedge Apr 17 #52

They are desparately scrambling to find something trumpy -poo can use to get off the hook. GreenWave Apr 17 #36

Another captive institution of the ultra-rich. Kid Berwyn Apr 17 #42

3 or 4 members answer to the Republican party, not the US Constiution Johnny2X2X Apr 17 #47

Exactly..they are just ruling on political beliefs now Demovictory9 Apr 17 #51

Six of them are traitors NanaCat Apr 17 #48

You clearly don't understand the definition of "traitors" TexasDem69 Apr 17 #53

PRECISELY. The fact that some still have to ask B.See Apr 17 #55

The start to a solution of a politically biased court is to win in November. NowsTheTime Apr 17 #54

As someone said above ... Xoan Apr 17 #56