Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Poor Donald just doesn't understand. [View all]
No, you can't just endlessly strike potential jurors for no justifiable cause (i.e. undue bias or lack of impartiality).
Link to tweet
He's not in control of things any longer, and he is freaking out.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
43 replies, 3797 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (62)
ReplyReply to this post
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cheat !?!?!? TSF puts in 79 in the total line before it evens gets to the course
Traurigkeit
Apr 17
#36
Each side has four peremptory strikes left to use for five more potential jurors out of the pool.
ancianita
Apr 17
#14
Unlimited "For Cause" but only ever 10 Peremptories, [Redacted]. Always been so. n/t
TygrBright
Apr 17
#18
84 or less was classified as borderline mental retardation when I was studying for my M.Ed. in Voc Rehab
ArkansasDemocrat1
Apr 17
#38
It's not, it's what I'd call low average, and his learning disabilities don't help
ArkansasDemocrat1
Apr 17
#42