Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baltimike

(4,148 posts)

8. Really? I think it minimalizes it .

Reply to Silent3 (Reply #7)

Wed Apr 24, 2024, 07:28 PM

Apr 24

I don't watch the news though, so there's that...what little bit I do see (coffee shops, stores, restaurants, etc) make this seem like it was just a personal indiscretion he wanted to shield Melania from as opposed to the complicated 'catch and kill" to keep him off the headlines and LITERALLY fake news on any of his opponents.

That's a helluva lot more than "hush money"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Moving forward, PLEASE call this "election fraud" or "election interference" as opposed to "hush money" [View all] Baltimike Apr 24 OP

Imagine Johnny2X2X Apr 24 #1

Except he wasn't charged with either one of those things. Not in this case. CrispyQ Apr 24 #2

It's absolutely election fraud...he even tried to postpone payment until AFTER Baltimike Apr 24 #5

THIS. But as I have discovered, it is very hard to get even the knowledgable DU community to acknowledge Hekate Apr 24 #3

Maybe so but he wasn't charged that way. jimfields33 Apr 24 #4

I thought it was enhanced penalty business fraud Model35mech Apr 24 #6

I actually think "hush money case", especially with the Stormy Daniels connection... Silent3 Apr 24 #7

Really? I think it minimalizes it . Baltimike Apr 24 #8