Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,367 posts)
48. They are all too often in the business of flattering the owner's ego - "power without responsibility"
Thu Apr 25, 2024, 02:42 PM
Apr 25
The two press lords were doing all possible to oust Baldwin, by supporting a new party, founded by Beaverbrook, to press for Empire Free Trade. In March 1931 there was a by-election in St George’s Westminster, in which Beaverbrook and Rothermere ran an Empire Free Trade candidate against Duff Cooper for the Conservatives.

Through their columns they accused Baldwin of running an ‘insolent plutocracy’ and of being clueless on how to improve the country’s faltering economy. Three days before the vote, on March 17, 1931, Baldwin counterattacked in a scathing speech.

The newspapers attacking me are not newspapers in the ordinary sense. They are engines of propaganda for the constantly changing policies, desires, personal vices, personal likes and dislikes of the two men. What are their methods? Their methods are direct false- hoods misrepresentation, half-truths, the alteration of the speaker’s meaning by publishing a sentence apart from the context…What the proprietorship of these papers is aiming at is power, and power without responsibility – the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages
.

‘Power without responsibility’ was a phrase Kipling had coined in 1916 in a conversation with Beaverbrook, whom he knew well and was coming to mistrust. In 1931 it turned the tide for Duff Cooper, and the candidate of the press lords was defeated.

https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/quotation/quotes_harlot.htm
Let's see how the shitBird NYT responds to the revelations being out in the open. NoMoreRepugs Apr 25 #1
This guy sounds like a real jerk. tavernier Apr 25 #2
Agreed. And I doubt that their source is what he says he is. ificandream Apr 25 #14
It comes from the inherited wealth it seems. LiberalArkie Apr 25 #33
And those of us pointing out the obvious bias Voltaire2 Apr 25 #3
I'm curious to see if any of the perennial NYT apologists will comment. yardwork Apr 25 #6
I'm wondering what horrible insult Clinton Voltaire2 Apr 25 #8
did bill take a shot at them during the impeachment? mopinko Apr 25 #13
I don't think the Clinton coverage was bias. It was inexperience. ificandream Apr 25 #21
The negative NYT coverage of the Clintons started NanaCat Apr 25 #42
The Times didn't start the negative coverage. The right-wing media did. ificandream Apr 25 #47
She was a female candidate for President PatSeg Apr 25 #22
marrying Bill Clinton whom they loathed with the power of a billion suns dsc Apr 25 #28
Bill Clinton was, is, an incredibly brilliant man from a poor background. shrike3 Apr 25 #40
Including 5 random NYT articles edhopper Apr 25 #9
Claude Rains would be shocked, as well. dchill Apr 25 #61
LOL! ShazzieB Apr 26 #66
Hmmmmmm malaise Apr 25 #4
he either slept through et tu Apr 25 #11
This does not surprise me. Lonestarblue Apr 25 #5
Also a key player in all of the hate on Democrats NanaCat Apr 25 #43
All the more reason... 2naSalit Apr 25 #7
Done some months back. I should have done so with, "...but her emails" NNadir Apr 25 #15
we cancelled last fall. I don't miss it. NT LittleGirl Apr 25 #25
How petty and selfish. SergeStorms Apr 25 #10
Actually A.G. believes he's above it all, like so many of his idols. Imagine that? Ford_Prefect Apr 25 #12
Even when the Nazis Farmer-Rick Apr 25 #34
Fritz Thyssen found this out when he was interred at Dachau DBoon Apr 25 #54
Wow, I looked him up Farmer-Rick Apr 26 #65
Anyone still have a subscription....if so why??!! PortTack Apr 25 #16
Because it's one of the two best newspapers (along with the WashPost) in the country. ificandream Apr 25 #24
No, it is not a good newspaper NanaCat Apr 25 #44
"Vast majority"? Sounds like you monitor it closely. maxsolomon Apr 25 #46
You might still be thinking of... Think. Again. Apr 25 #53
Nana Cat is right. soldierant Apr 25 #64
I still subscribe to the Times & Wash Post - TBF Apr 25 #27
Love to see Biden do a short interview with A.G. KS Toronado Apr 25 #17
So, "give us an interview ro we give you bad coverage?" Happy Hoosier Apr 25 #18
Thug Journalism. The Unmitigated Gall Apr 25 #30
Nothing in this story surprises me. shrike3 Apr 25 #41
"retribution". Sounds just like trump. So glad I cancelled my subscription to The NY Times, after they accused JohnSJ Apr 25 #19
Their new motto: "All the ethics we don't use when we print" Wonder Why Apr 25 #20
Sulzberger allegedly told employees to court conservative readers, so this should come as no surprise. JohnSJ Apr 25 #23
When and why have so many big shots in this country become so petty? SleeplessinSoCal Apr 25 #26
I doubt it's new - it's just that everything is so much more in the public eye now with social media, etc. TBF Apr 25 #31
This "either you do a sit-down interview with us, OR we'll harp on your age, and whatever else" is coercive. summer_in_TX Apr 25 #29
A smart candidate does not do interviews NanaCat Apr 25 #45
With the chairman's petulant attitude, it's not surprising President Biden hasn't elected to give an interview dlk Apr 25 #32
All the news orangecrush Apr 25 #35
Right. And how many interviews has Trump given? jalan48 Apr 25 #36
I like the NYT's word games and puzzles. Prof. Toru Tanaka Apr 25 #37
Peter Baker gave the game away during an interview post-Hur report. shrike3 Apr 25 #38
I thought newspapers were in the business of reporting the news, not retribution. surfered Apr 25 #39
They are all too often in the business of flattering the owner's ego - "power without responsibility" muriel_volestrangler Apr 25 #48
Lapdogs Peter Baker and Jonathan Swan have rushed to Sulzberger's defense FelineOverlord Apr 25 #49
This is just petty and stupid enough to be real. n/t malthaussen Apr 25 #50
It's a shame.. Think. Again. Apr 25 #51
Talk About Petty and Vindictive! The Roux Comes First Apr 25 #52
The New York Times is on the same election rigging level as the National Enquirer OnDoutside Apr 25 #55
I remember reading are article being interviewed by USA Today kimbutgar Apr 25 #56
The Petty Feud Between the NYT and the White House LetMyPeopleVote Apr 25 #57
Okay so that's it then. Iggo Apr 25 #58
Do they still emphasize the term 'Sleepy Joe'? keithbvadu2 Apr 25 #59
Republican OWNED media does this all the time. No surprise. live love laugh Apr 25 #60
The Judith Miller Times Strikes Again! D23MIURG23 Apr 25 #62
The NYT needs an enema. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 25 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT reporter says their n...»Reply #48