Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
When Thomas didn't recuse [View all] senseandsensibility Apr 25 OP
They know they don't have to work or appear fair. Irish_Dem Apr 25 #1
Time to pack it up, or IF they give immunity to the insurrectionist, Bluethroughu Apr 25 #2
From what I've read about today's hearing... Think. Again. Apr 25 #3
This is the exact sort of unconstitutional act TexasDem69 Apr 25 #5
What's shocking is that Trump and his attorneys would propose such a blatantly unconstitutional and illegal act n/t B.See Apr 25 #7
If trump gets immunity, we live in a lawless country. Bluethroughu Apr 25 #11
Plan B TexasDem69 Apr 25 #13
If the former insurrectionist President gets immunity Bluethroughu Apr 25 #15
No it doesn't TexasDem69 Apr 25 #17
For 200 years we did not need to make up the idea that a President has total immunity. Bluethroughu Apr 25 #20
You're conflating different concepts TexasDem69 Apr 25 #21
So how is it rouge state, if the Supreme Court says it is not by a President? Bluethroughu Apr 25 #24
The Constitution states that all federal judges TexasDem69 Apr 25 #26
I do, when a Constitution exists. If these Supreme Bluethroughu Apr 25 #28
Trump isn't president! TexasDem69 Apr 25 #29
The fact that this IS BEING ARGUED AT THE SCOTUS IS SOMETHING. Bluethroughu Apr 25 #30
"Smirk. - Clarence (R) BoRaGard Apr 25 #4
What arguments were in "bad faith" TexasDem69 Apr 25 #6
Bad faith is when you make an argument that is not serious and you know its not. flashman13 Apr 25 #10
So what arguments were in bad faith? TexasDem69 Apr 25 #22
Term Limits CitizenZero Apr 25 #8
This Supreme Court has ONE guiding principle....POWER world wide wally Apr 25 #9
Only so long as they vote with their benefactors. Bluethroughu Apr 25 #16
As the Court stands now, it is vestigial, impotent, corrupted. Magoo48 Apr 25 #12
That's so much nonsense TexasDem69 Apr 25 #14
DOBBS. Bluethroughu Apr 25 #18
How is Dobbs inconsistent with the Constitution? TexasDem69 Apr 25 #19
We had Rowe v wade for decades, because the Bluethroughu Apr 25 #23
Eh, that's not really what Roe said TexasDem69 Apr 25 #25
Who's gonna make him? (n/t) Retrograde Apr 25 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When Thomas didn't recuse»Reply #9