Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LT Barclay

(2,609 posts)

31. I'd love to see the someone present this discussion to them in exactly those terms.

Reply to perfessor (Reply #12)

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:10 PM

Apr 25

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why, on Democratic Underground, [View all] sarisataka Apr 25 OP

Never Rebl2 Apr 25 #1

I haven't seen that senseandsensibility Apr 25 #2

That is certainly the best way MuseRider Apr 25 #3

Look on page 1 of GD sarisataka Apr 25 #6

Which OP's ? Let's get them taken down ! KS Toronado Apr 25 #30

Venting (very inappropriately). But that is not allowed here hlthe2b Apr 25 #4

Guess I missed those posts, but if that's happening, wnylib Apr 25 #5

Look in GD... sarisataka Apr 25 #7

Haven't they been alerted and removed yet? wnylib Apr 25 #10

. sarisataka Apr 25 #11

I alerted on the one I saw MustLoveBeagles Apr 25 #27

Not allowed. Please report if and when you see any post suggesting physical harm to anyone. Fla Dem Apr 25 #8

Alert on it. Kingofalldems Apr 25 #9

Nobody is suggesting that. perfessor Apr 25 #12

It would probably be helpful for the Justices to understand that they would make themselves.... kentuck Apr 25 #26

I'd love to see the someone present this discussion to them in exactly those terms. LT Barclay Apr 25 #31

Heck, even Joyce Vance pointed out soldierant Apr 25 #36

I haven't seen people doing that. Elessar Zappa Apr 25 #13

No, not seeing that at all. sheshe2 Apr 25 #14

The most explicit one said sarisataka Apr 25 #17

I think one hypothetical post about the scenario is enough, but that's just my opinion. LeftInTX Apr 25 #15

The SCOTUS will come up with a pseudo legal argument why only Lucky Luciano Apr 25 #20

That's a reasonable observation and question Hekate Apr 25 #16

There is one responce to a post in GD revmclaren Apr 25 #18

My question about the President assassinating a Supreme Court Justice was to show how silly Trump's argument is. surfered Apr 25 #19

It's meant to provoke thought. Not to be taken seriously. mzmolly Apr 25 #21

I get the sense they are more sdfernando Apr 25 #22

That is one point of view... DemocraticPatriot Apr 25 #33

Or...can a hypothetical thought exercise be used like Trump using a quote to get around violating the gag order? elocs Apr 26 #41

It's a propaganda tsunami. kentuck Apr 25 #23

go ahead and post some links Skittles Apr 25 #24

Satirists. We are becoming satirists. dchill Apr 25 #25

And trolls never sleep. nt Brenda Apr 26 #42

People need to be careful about what they post. Even when trying to be funny. mucifer Apr 25 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocraticPatriot Apr 25 #29

Steam release. chouchou Apr 25 #32

I have not seen such things, but if so will surely alert. That is not OK. Just because PatrickforB Apr 25 #34

I have not seen that once. Never mind multiple times. mahina Apr 25 #35

If you can't link to examples mountain grammy Apr 25 #37

A direct link could be considered a call out sarisataka Apr 25 #38

I suggested raising the hypothetical in court... JT45242 Apr 25 #39

I think "asking about" and discussing... Think. Again. Apr 26 #40

Gee it just might be rhetorical hyperbole Voltaire2 Apr 26 #43

My rule of thumb is simple sarisataka Apr 26 #45

Scratch a liberal... WhiskeyGrinder Apr 26 #44

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why, on Democratic Underg...»Reply #31