Can someone explain how the MSM is any different than the National Enquirer? [View all]

Sure, the New York Times might be a little less glossy, but their "coverage" of Hillary Clinton's emails and President Biden's age are about as factual as Rat-Boy and Alien Abductions.

Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd provide as much "depth" to their reporting as the guy reporting on the toast that looks like Jesus, or is it Ian Gillan...I get the two confused.

The media has a lot of nerve to laugh at David Pecker.

They've all become Peckers.

It doesn't matter if the whore is paid in quarters, or by an American Express Black Card. The profession is still the same.