Elie Mystal: The Media's Coverage of Trump's Immunity Case Has Been Appalling [View all]
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/media-supreme-court-trump-immunity/
No paywall link
https://archive.li/GGenQ
In the few days since the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. United Statesthe case that will determine whether Donald Trump has lifetime immunity from crimes he committed while in officethe national media has failed. The reports about what happened during the hearing, and how the Republican justices are likely to rule, range from credulous simplicity to outright gaslighting. The court will almost certainly take the extreme, unprecedented, and previously unfathomable position that Trump cannot be held criminally accountable for all of his actionsand the reason it is likely to do so is that the court knows the media will carry its water and normalize its ruling to a public that lacks the time and acumen to fully appreciate what its doing.
Im not talking about Fox News or Newsmax, whose coverage I have not read or watched but assume its ranged from cultish to clownish, as it always does. Im talking about the mainstream press, the so-called liberal press, which is taking its cue from the Supreme Court and trying to normalize the proposition that presidents should be immune from at least some crimes.
The idea of presidential criminal immunity is wholly unprecedented in the American experience. Other than Donald Trump, only Richard Nixon has claimed it, and Nixons argument was roundly rejected, not just by the courts but by the media-industrial complex. This time, however, Trumps claimand the courts bankrupt willingness to back itis finding purchase in the national media.
At oral arguments, the conservatives on the court introduced the novel idea that a president may be immune to criminal prosecution for some actsspecifically, some official actsthat are performed in his (or her, theoretically) role as president. That idea runs counter to the very principle of the rule of law, but its one the Republican justices entertained in order to accomplish their central goal of preventing Trump from facing trial before the election. Its also a convenient way for conservative justices to foster the idea of an imperial presidencyone where conservative presidents are fully free to trample on civil rights and use maximal force to accomplish their official goals, unrestrained by the rest of society.
*snip*