Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Supreme Court is not interpreting existing law [View all]bluestarone
(17,290 posts)19. This i like
Always thought no side should be able to pick. Maybe 27 names in a hat. then pick 9 names out of the hat each case.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The SCOTUS ruling in the 14th Amendment disqualification issue was also largely dicta
LetMyPeopleVote
May 1
#25
If TSF returns to the WH, expect to see "Brown v Board of Education" overturned.
no_hypocrisy
May 2
#45