Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
119. I support reproductive rights.
Thu May 18, 2017, 08:17 PM
May 2017

Last edited Fri May 19, 2017, 12:00 AM - Edit history (1)

But we can't ever go back to the Nineties, when that was seen as enough to distinguish Democrats from Republcans.
I was not saying anyone's rights are LESS important.

I wish Dennis had never been anti-choice, but he WAS running as a pro-choice candidate and I truly believe that the dynamics of the party would have made it impossible for him to be an anti-choice president.

I always thought he was a clown. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #1
Ditto to that. He always struck me as being too FRINGE for anyone to take seriously. NurseJackie May 2017 #76
He sold out. GaYellowDawg May 2017 #2
He crawled up Trump's ass and got stuck dalton99a May 2017 #3
Perhaps that explains the slight falling out between Trump and Rootin' Tootin' Putin. TheBlackAdder May 2017 #118
He was always a clown who gave liberals a bad name. nycbos May 2017 #4
He gets paid to read the script just like everyone else. underpants May 2017 #5
He is who I thought he was. nt LexVegas May 2017 #6
Same as it ever was oberliner May 2017 #7
Not true. This is the opposite of where he was in 2004. Ken Burch May 2017 #29
No it's not oberliner May 2017 #31
In 2004, he was right to say the party was too timid and centrist. Ken Burch May 2017 #36
So what do you think has happened to him? oberliner May 2017 #47
Defeat, frustration, bitterness at some level, perhaps. Ken Burch May 2017 #50
I didn't say anything about him running for president oberliner May 2017 #52
I'm truly not sure how he got here(my impression was that he backed HRC in the primaries in '16). Ken Burch May 2017 #90
TinyURLed link, but... moriah May 2017 #127
To make it clear, I don't condone anything he's doing now. Ken Burch May 2017 #133
NO. Kucinich illustrates the narrow gap between far left and far right. Hortensis May 2017 #99
pay check from Fox grantcart May 2017 #67
He was actually inconsequential karynnj May 2017 #61
The convention should never just be about the candidate as a person. Ken Burch May 2017 #95
I think you missed many things Kerry actually said karynnj May 2017 #112
The problem in 1968 was the brutal suppression of protest, not the protests themselves. Ken Burch May 2017 #113
He did not treat the a the antiwar people as lepers karynnj May 2017 #115
There was no good reason to ban antiwar signs at the convention. Ken Burch May 2017 #120
The country was turning against having entered the war, however when presented with what to do karynnj May 2017 #121
I agree with you on Bush's 2003 popularity and the role of the economy and of the running mate Ken Burch May 2017 #123
oberliber is right -- he was always a wingnut obamanut2012 May 2017 #54
oberliner, not oberliber. Ken Burch May 2017 #94
Poor Dennis. Couldn't win any primaries. MineralMan May 2017 #8
He wasn't wrong to run in 2004. Ken Burch May 2017 #30
Anyone can run who meets the constitutional qualifications. MineralMan May 2017 #56
He's always been a bit loony Renew Deal May 2017 #9
There is still a Dennis Kucinich Group here on DU: MineralMan May 2017 #10
Hell, even I used to like him back in '04 Blue_Tires May 2017 #26
Of course it's not active. The man isn't part of active politics anymore. Ken Burch May 2017 #37
And yet, it is still here, isn't it? MineralMan May 2017 #55
It's only here because nobody thought to close it. Ken Burch May 2017 #96
Why did you even bring Hillary into this? It's amazing how she is pulled into threads lunamagica May 2017 #59
She wasn't "pulled in" as such. The reference was to the DU discussion group, not the person. Gore1FL May 2017 #80
I brought her group into it, not her. Ken Burch May 2017 #98
I did TexasTowelie May 2017 #86
I saw that post. Back in 2016, I believe. MineralMan May 2017 #87
He is very pro-privacy and hates the patriot act and believes in deep state. Demsrule86 May 2017 #11
And he's evidently on the Kremlin payroll... Blue_Tires May 2017 #25
I am sure of it...all the disgruntled pols end up on the Russian gravy train. Demsrule86 May 2017 #125
He's returned to his roots. DonViejo May 2017 #12
Damn you and your pesky facts. nycbos May 2017 #16
That's the primary reason I've never been a supporter; I well remember DonViejo May 2017 #20
I remember when if you said anything bad about him... nycbos May 2017 #23
I've only commented on him once, here on DU, saying what I've written in our DonViejo May 2017 #24
He stopped the munipal electric utility from being privatized Ken Burch May 2017 #39
That doesn't excuse his racism or the Trump-like confrontational politics he brought to DonViejo May 2017 #43
He had moved past all that by the time he entered Congress Ken Burch May 2017 #48
If he "moved past all that," why's he on Fox or, better still, defending Trump? DonViejo May 2017 #57
Guess he stopped trying to dupe Democrats... Bradical79 May 2017 #68
He wasn't duping anybody in 2004 or 2008 Ken Burch May 2017 #105
I don't know why he's on Fox, and I don't defend that. Ken Burch May 2017 #101
I never liked him...I never trusted him... DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #27
You mean his racist roots. nikibatts May 2017 #21
He cut his teeth playing racial politics. I always thought he was a phony. DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #35
Well, damnation Hekate May 2017 #65
He took the check blogslut May 2017 #13
he's always been a crazy looking for a cause to latch onto geek tragedy May 2017 #14
Frankly, I see no difference from when he was stabbing Democrats in the back while running for pres. Foamfollower May 2017 #15
It's called the Horseshoe Theory eissa May 2017 #17
I totally agree with this. I always said they were two sides of the same coin, lunamagica May 2017 #64
the problem with this shit is that it is non-specific. Who is far left? What criteria are you using JCanete May 2017 #92
Cleveland.com had an article in Feb 2017 about his running for Ohio gov in 2018. irisblue May 2017 #18
Like I have said for years he is part of the far left that joins the far-right snooper2 May 2017 #19
For Joiners without a real cause to rally for or win with what else can they do? nolabels May 2017 #128
He was always crazy. I never understood why Liberals liked him. Oneironaut May 2017 #22
Most people have a price... BigMin28 May 2017 #28
I'm saddened to see this. Something bad has happened to him. Ken Burch May 2017 #32
He said in Nov 2007 that Ron Paul was his choice of a running mate. pnwmom May 2017 #41
He didn't change, he has always been looney FLPanhandle May 2017 #33
Sometimes it seems C_U_L8R May 2017 #34
A tweet from Alex Jones? WellDarn May 2017 #38
There's a video of Kucinich you can watch. He's a Fox commentator now pnwmom May 2017 #42
It's not about Kucinich WellDarn May 2017 #45
I think Alex Jones is part of the point Bradical79 May 2017 #71
If you honestly belive I've broken DU policy Blue_Tires May 2017 #51
If you honestly believe you haven't WellDarn May 2017 #66
"self-discipline?" Blue_Tires May 2017 #73
Lol WellDarn May 2017 #78
I always thought he was goofy. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2017 #40
He once saw a UFO and felt a "connection in his heart and heard directions in his mind." VOX May 2017 #44
So he saw a freaking UFO...so what? Ken Burch May 2017 #49
It means he's a nut Bradical79 May 2017 #72
A whole stadium of folks saw a UFO Duppers May 2017 #89
We're in agreement Bradical79 May 2017 #97
Thank you for the clarification. Duppers May 2017 #108
No problem Bradical79 May 2017 #114
Oh boy. Scurrilous May 2017 #62
Well, now I wonder what the directions were. crosinski May 2017 #88
Dennis has now gone off the rails, but this doesn't invalidate the good in his past. Ken Burch May 2017 #46
You put it very well - thanks mvd May 2017 #63
well said, thank you. Raster May 2017 #81
Yep WellDarn May 2017 #109
Because he was only ever a DINO -- very RW always obamanut2012 May 2017 #53
He was the most progressive candidate in the race in 2004. Ken Burch May 2017 #85
Mr Anti Choice obamanut2012 May 2017 #100
and some of us remember that he was anti-choice until about the time he decided to run niyad May 2017 #58
this -- some in this thread forget how he treated women obamanut2012 May 2017 #102
Not me REP May 2017 #116
and some of us NEVER forget!! niyad May 2017 #132
Wow. Is He Still Around? Leith May 2017 #60
Who says Kucinich is wrong? Cicada May 2017 #69
That about where I am on this too. ucrdem May 2017 #122
I try to remember him like this. NCTraveler May 2017 #70
Or BumRushDaShow May 2017 #83
+1 NCTraveler May 2017 #130
Infowhores? Alex Jones? fleabiscuit May 2017 #74
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #75
lol I remember when so many here wanted him to win in 2004. hrmjustin May 2017 #77
He was the most progressive candidate that year. Ken Burch May 2017 #91
He was nuts then as he is nuts now. hrmjustin May 2017 #93
wrong, he was always an anti choice wingnut obamanut2012 May 2017 #103
He was pro-choice as a presidential candidate Ken Burch May 2017 #106
Without reproductive rights, economic and social change is not possible REP May 2017 #117
I support reproductive rights. Ken Burch May 2017 #119
Oh no, Denny, honey... back on the meds. Raster May 2017 #79
IMO Republicans are ready to get rid of Trump and move Pence in. Sunlei May 2017 #82
Probably so. Ken Burch May 2017 #107
Pence would pick someone rpannier May 2017 #131
I know it's intolerant, but I'm starting to see it as "Catholics Gone Bad." Pence is one too. hunter May 2017 #84
He was always a flake still_one May 2017 #104
Poor Dennis didn't fare too well on the "Sing along with Campaign 2008" online album DFW May 2017 #110
Wow, that's creepy. intheflow May 2017 #111
Nutzo!nt Tom67 May 2017 #124
.... Historic NY May 2017 #126
absolutely nothing krawhitham May 2017 #129
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What in fuck's name happe...»Reply #119