Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am going to say something very controversial for some... [View all]Rebl2
(13,748 posts)166. They need to do
that at the federal level also.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
249 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think Sherrod Brown could help us in the rust belt and with maybe Rep. Joseph Kennedy III,
Demsrule86
May 2017
#204
I agree that we ought to get better, and fast, at linguistic framing.
Warren DeMontague
May 2017
#159
I like both of them very much. I was hoping Hillary would choose one or the other
Demsrule86
May 2017
#200
I thought she already did. Isn't that why people were going after her daughter?
bettyellen
May 2017
#131
She already did...and I hope Sen. Sanders understands the time has come and gone...
Demsrule86
May 2017
#203
No running against the establishment!!!!! I am sick of the anti-establishment bull shit ...
Demsrule86
May 2017
#83
And look what it got us. How anyone can think putting a non-politician in the WH was a good
BlueCaliDem
May 2017
#113
Generally, that's been the case up until Barack Obama, who proved Senators can get'r done, too. eom
BlueCaliDem
May 2017
#125
As long as they win, which is harder when certain folks work overtime to divide the
Eliot Rosewater
May 2017
#13
I am hoping for s Joseph Kennedy III and Sherod Brown ticket right now
world wide wally
May 2017
#34
"a Kennedy"? Dynasty much? No more dynasties, please. If you can't be specific, please don't bother.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2017
#149
I've only seen people who hate her float this idea- same people who were so
bettyellen
May 2017
#144
I'm saying I've really only seen people who dislike her floating the idea- trying to be divisive ...
bettyellen
May 2017
#151
she said that she didn't think she would....she has said that in previous years as well
virtualobserver
May 2017
#247
I think based on his actions, Sen. Sanders does plan to run...and I don't think he can do it as a
Demsrule86
May 2017
#89
They will run candidates for low profile offices like Director of Sanitation
Jake Stern
May 2017
#132
Hardly controversial, and not even new. Your opipnion is shared, and not just by anonymous bloggers
DFW
May 2017
#28
I don't think we have learned anything from the past election, or we learned the wrong things
Sen. Walter Sobchak
May 2017
#181
I don't think there is any way Clinton would put her hat in after losing to Trump.
demmiblue
May 2017
#29
I can't see Newsom turning around and running for president right after winning election
StevieM
May 2017
#184
I agree we need new blood and voices to speak for the Democratic Party in 2020
kimbutgar
May 2017
#38
Agree! Thinking of France and Canada... We need new and younger, too, but with intelligence.
manicraven
May 2017
#41
I respect all three of them, but you are absolutely correct--we need someone younger
Mrs. Overall
May 2017
#42
It needs to be someone likeable with personality. It goes without saying that they will be knowled-
kerry-is-my-prez
May 2017
#63
I always vote for the Dem...and reason we are in this mess has much to do with purity tests and a
Demsrule86
May 2017
#234
In a Primary they are usually all Democrats considering Republicans do not represent my
Dustlawyer
May 2017
#213
If a seat is democratically held...I do not vote for a primary challenger unless
Demsrule86
May 2017
#233
I wish...if that were the case we would have won in 2000, 2004, 2010 and 2012 and the
Demsrule86
May 2017
#243
I agree. I admire all of them for the service they have given this country, but
smirkymonkey
May 2017
#93
right, because we want to attract those superficial, emotion-based voters... not. nt
TheFrenchRazor
May 2017
#98
I'll vote for the most qualified, regardless of who wins the personality contest.
Lil Missy
May 2017
#99
I don't know how we take the nation's temperature in the age of alt facts.
SleeplessinSoCal
May 2017
#104
This title is click bait: not controversial at all. Not contra at all, simply sensible.
Dorn
May 2017
#105
Although I knew Hillary was going to be tha nominee I always thought O'Malley was an easier sell
underpants
May 2017
#110
Likewise. I was surprised he didn't do better. If I recall correctly, even
WestSeattle2
May 2017
#119
Hillary already said no to future runs. She has turned over her campaign voter lists to the DNC.
riversedge
May 2017
#115
There is evidence indicating Ronald Reagan was suffering from Alzheimer's
WestSeattle2
May 2017
#121
Ya well alot of people also thought we didnt need to worry about Trump becoming President either. nt
cstanleytech
May 2017
#195
I've seen this sentiment so often online that I'm tempted to remove my eyes with a melon baller...
CBHagman
May 2017
#179
Agreed! I'm in my mid-50s and am tired of the older generation running/ruining everything
electron_blue
May 2017
#221
I agree! It's time to move on and embrace a new group of Dems to lead the party!
TheDebbieDee
May 2017
#226