Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you agree or disagree with this general statement about where U.S. foreign policy should go? [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)69. That's wrong again.
The term "Nasty" has no relation to gender in my use of it.
You should have thought of that before you said it.
I remember what Trump said, but I have nothing in common with him
Nobody said you have anything in common with him. But I can tell you that I'm not going to remain silent when anyone uses code words to disparage me.
and I campaigned hard for Hillary in the fall.
So? What does that have do with anything? Just out of the blue you throw that in there? We all did. It's irrelevant. It serves no good purpose to mention it and it raises eyebrows.
MARGE: Hi, Homer! Welcome home! How was work?
HOMER: Well, I didn't go to Moe's, if that's what you mean!
It was specifically about your person discourse...about you as an individual...and I'd have said the exact same thing about anyone else who posts in the way you do.
Well, you can try to make it about me, but that would be a mistake. Besides, I really can't be responsible for someone who "owns" an idea with such passion that they feel personally wounded whenever someone else shoots it down or points out it's flaws or reminds them that it's been rejected or that it's not forward-looking or that it's not realistic, etc.
I'll amend it to "pointlessly harsh on a personal level".
The opposite of that would be "absurdly sensitive on a personal level" and again, I'll reference something that was said earlier. That's a juvenile response to confrontation and a clashing of ideas. I can't be responsible for someone else's hypersensitivity, nor am I willing to concede an argument or debate or decline making a point so as not to upset their delicate feelings.
Just as an example (and I know it sounds unbelievable, so bear with me) there was one person who expressed consternation that I often use the format of "quote and reply"... supposedly he or she found that style to be unnecessarily "aggressive". Another person says that my use of the animated waving smilie is being "dismissive" or some such nonsense. I mean, seriously! Can you imagine? Honestly, something like THAT is the definition of someone being emotionally crippled by their own hypersensitivity.
PS: Our nation still doesn't make deals or "partnerships" with the peoples of a nation. It's always with the heads of governments or their duly authorized representatives (in case you forgot what this was all about). See? In spite of all the distractions and trying to make this about Nurse Jackie... I still remember.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you agree or disagree with this general statement about where U.S. foreign policy should go? [View all]
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
OP
It sounded like you were comparing the speech to Pacino's courtroom speech in that movie
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#19
Along those lines, if there are three people on an elevator and one farts.........
George II
Sep 2017
#16
This is a thread about the idea. It doesn't matter what you feel about the person who said it.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#6
Sounds like populism when you promise to reach out to the world's poor...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#22
I'm support "fair trade"-that is trade deals that guarantee workers in different countries
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#50
That's not a partnership. That's PR or goodwill, it's an apology-tour, but it's not a partnership.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#23
I gotta laugh at the idea of someone running campaigning on that. And won't oppose
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#30
It's bizarre that none of this has to do with doing things today. Why is their no policy for now?
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#55
I know an Iranian American woman who wants to do business with IRan and other countries
JI7
Sep 2017
#48
Obviously, after "drain the swamp" and "make America great again" we need to question
Warpy
Sep 2017
#49
Are you pretending Dems have no policy positions ? Because that's what this "solely on Trump"
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#56
No, I'm not pretending that(and I AM a Democrat, so please don't imply I'm an outsider)
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#57
The idea of actually listening to and working with the global majority terrifies you, I think.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#51
We use that language and sentiment anytime we want to screw over another government.
rogue emissary
Sep 2017
#15
OK. A cynic can co-opt any positive concept...we all KNOW that...what's your point here?
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#54
It *is* silly-fluff but it's fun to watch people try to make it MORE important than it actually is
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#60
Perhaps it is time for the United States to seek partnerships with the people of Venezuela...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#65