Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
69. That's wrong again.
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 07:52 PM
Sep 2017
The term "Nasty" has no relation to gender in my use of it.
You should have thought of that before you said it.

I remember what Trump said, but I have nothing in common with him
Nobody said you have anything in common with him. But I can tell you that I'm not going to remain silent when anyone uses code words to disparage me.

and I campaigned hard for Hillary in the fall.
So? What does that have do with anything? Just out of the blue you throw that in there? We all did. It's irrelevant. It serves no good purpose to mention it and it raises eyebrows.

MARGE: Hi, Homer! Welcome home! How was work?
HOMER: Well, I didn't go to Moe's, if that's what you mean!


It was specifically about your person discourse...about you as an individual...and I'd have said the exact same thing about anyone else who posts in the way you do.
Well, you can try to make it about me, but that would be a mistake. Besides, I really can't be responsible for someone who "owns" an idea with such passion that they feel personally wounded whenever someone else shoots it down or points out it's flaws or reminds them that it's been rejected or that it's not forward-looking or that it's not realistic, etc.

I'll amend it to "pointlessly harsh on a personal level".
The opposite of that would be "absurdly sensitive on a personal level" and again, I'll reference something that was said earlier. That's a juvenile response to confrontation and a clashing of ideas. I can't be responsible for someone else's hypersensitivity, nor am I willing to concede an argument or debate or decline making a point so as not to upset their delicate feelings.

Just as an example (and I know it sounds unbelievable, so bear with me) there was one person who expressed consternation that I often use the format of "quote and reply"... supposedly he or she found that style to be unnecessarily "aggressive". Another person says that my use of the animated waving smilie is being "dismissive" or some such nonsense. I mean, seriously! Can you imagine? Honestly, something like THAT is the definition of someone being emotionally crippled by their own hypersensitivity.



PS: Our nation still doesn't make deals or "partnerships" with the peoples of a nation. It's always with the heads of governments or their duly authorized representatives (in case you forgot what this was all about). See? In spite of all the distractions and trying to make this about Nurse Jackie... I still remember.

3 guys walk into a bar Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #1
Where do you get that from this quote? Ken Burch Sep 2017 #4
Sense of humor much? Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #5
You needn't ask. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #8
If the clip actually applied, guillaumeb Sep 2017 #10
It sounded like you were comparing the speech to Pacino's courtroom speech in that movie Ken Burch Sep 2017 #19
Along those lines, if there are three people on an elevator and one farts......... George II Sep 2017 #16
That's why I only fart in crowded elevators. Nt Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #25
He invented foreign policy years ago. nt LexVegas Sep 2017 #2
Only he can fix everything! FSogol Sep 2017 #3
This is a thread about the idea. It doesn't matter what you feel about the person who said it. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #6
can't get partnership with people who have no interest beachbum bob Sep 2017 #7
You mean Russia doesn't want to held hands and replace their oil w solar? bettyellen Sep 2017 #35
Instead of endless war, which profits the war industries, guillaumeb Sep 2017 #9
Sounds like populist demogogery taken to new global dimensions... Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #11
It's populist demagogery to say we should globally ally with the poor? Ken Burch Sep 2017 #20
Sounds like populism when you promise to reach out to the world's poor... Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #22
You're talking nonsense. PETRUS Sep 2017 #31
I'm support "fair trade"-that is trade deals that guarantee workers in different countries Ken Burch Sep 2017 #50
It's a naive and unrealistic approach. Or a very clumsy phrase... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #12
. George II Sep 2017 #17
### NurseJackie Sep 2017 #24
OK...here are some ways you can create such a partnership: Ken Burch Sep 2017 #21
That's not a partnership. That's PR or goodwill, it's an apology-tour, but it's not a partnership. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #23
The quote was a broadstrokes statement. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #42
I gotta laugh at the idea of someone running campaigning on that. And won't oppose bettyellen Sep 2017 #30
Not wish away other governments. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #43
It's bizarre that none of this has to do with doing things today. Why is their no policy for now? bettyellen Sep 2017 #55
Because the long-term also matters. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #58
I know an Iranian American woman who wants to do business with IRan and other countries JI7 Sep 2017 #48
It's a typical political slogan Warpy Sep 2017 #29
It was never meant to be an end in itself. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #44
Obviously, after "drain the swamp" and "make America great again" we need to question Warpy Sep 2017 #49
OK. But I don't know why you think I disagree with any of that. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #52
Are you pretending Dems have no policy positions ? Because that's what this "solely on Trump" bettyellen Sep 2017 #56
No, I'm not pretending that(and I AM a Democrat, so please don't imply I'm an outsider) Ken Burch Sep 2017 #57
Is this supposed to be something we should respond to? NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #13
:) sheshe2 Sep 2017 #14
. George II Sep 2017 #18
Ah, those were the days! NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #38
The whole thing is so unrealistic. It doesn't represent the real world. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #27
Exactly, actually it's sounding like a trade agreement. R B Garr Sep 2017 #39
The idea of actually listening to and working with the global majority terrifies you, I think. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #51
LOL! Cloudy with a chance of meatballs... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #61
This is the difference with us. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #62
Well... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #64
I don't need to scroll up. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #66
Sigh... very disappointing. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #67
The term "Nasty" has no relation to gender in my use of it. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #68
That's wrong again. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #69
It's simply a line in a speech. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #45
We use that language and sentiment anytime we want to screw over another government. rogue emissary Sep 2017 #15
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #26
trump is a foreign agent chaking53 Sep 2017 #28
It is not possible. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #32
The issue I have with it... PoorMonger Sep 2017 #33
I wasn't calling for trusting the current government. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #46
But it's still a part of reality PoorMonger Sep 2017 #53
OK. A cynic can co-opt any positive concept...we all KNOW that...what's your point here? Ken Burch Sep 2017 #54
I'm saying that PoorMonger Sep 2017 #59
I think it's actually meaningless fluff, so none of the above. bettyellen Sep 2017 #34
It *is* silly-fluff but it's fun to watch people try to make it MORE important than it actually is NurseJackie Sep 2017 #60
pap delisen Sep 2017 #36
Is This Rhetorical? Me. Sep 2017 #37
DIY trade deals/diplomacy? betsuni Sep 2017 #40
like the US arming Syrian Rebels fighting Assad and ISIS ? JI7 Sep 2017 #41
No. There aren't any rebels in Syria fighting for anything positive Ken Burch Sep 2017 #47
I can't argue with the statement. Can't understand it, either. JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2017 #63
Perhaps it is time for the United States to seek partnerships with the people of Venezuela... Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you agree or disagree ...»Reply #69