Announcements

ShazzieB

(16,661 posts)

8. Thanks for this announcement.

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Mar 6, 2024, 04:38 PM

Mar 6

Last edited Wed Mar 6, 2024, 07:10 PM - Edit history (1)

It's good to have this clarity going forward. I do have one question, though. You said the following:

To be clear, it's not against the rules to provide constructive criticism of the Biden campaign going forward, it just can't be done from the perspective of "my candidate is/would have been a better choice."

What if someone posts to express general dissatisfaction with Biden being the candidate without arguing for another specific candidate?

The reason I ask is that I've seen a few posts (not many, but a few) along the lines of "Biden shouldn't be the candidate, it should be someone younger." In your view, would it be appropriate to alert on something like that?

I would be interested in your input. I don't want to ignore something problematic, but I also don't want to waste everyone's time sending unnecessary alerts. Thanks!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Super Tuesday results, and DU policy going forward [View all] EarlG Mar 6 OP

Thank you for the info.... multigraincracker Mar 6 #1

What?!? No paeans of love and regret for Jason whatsisname in American Samoa? TygrBright Mar 6 #2

Can I ask for another policy going forward? No (or minimal) shots of tfg mug, please. erronis Mar 6 #3

Oh, it will be so nice PatSeg Mar 6 #4

I am thrilled to fall in line MontanaMama Mar 6 #5

Thank you for the reminder. lark Mar 6 #6

No matter what you want from politics markodochartaigh Mar 6 #7

Thanks for this announcement. ShazzieB Mar 6 #8

My answer may not be very helpful I'm afraid :) EarlG Mar 6 #11

This gives me a lot more insught, thanks! ShazzieB Mar 6 #12

So it is written. So it shall be done. SergeStorms Mar 6 #9

Thanks, EarlG! calimary Mar 6 #10

Thank you. 100% on point. flying-skeleton Mar 6 #13